Pope Blasts Baby-Killing Policies of Harris
By Cliff Kincaid Since President Trump has survived an assassination attempt, the fact that the liberal “commie” Pope has called abortion the “assassination” of an innocent unborn child is significant. The use of this term implies a calculated plan to kill someone. It means the mother is not absolved of responsibility for the deliberate crime of murder. It means the abortionist is only part of the plot. Perhaps I was wrong about Pope Francis. I always thought he was a Marxist. If you didn’t hear about the pope’s remarks, take a look. As noted by CBS News and other media, Francis “reiterated the Catholic Church's position that abortion is murder.” The pope said, “Whether you like the word or not, it is a killing. It is an assassination, and on this we should be clear.” It’s not “reproductive health care” or “freedom,” as Harris calls it. Frankly, I had never heard the word “assassination” used in the context of abortion. But it fits. It goes without saying that it’s murder. But an assassination? That implies something like what happened to Lincoln and JFK – a cold-blooded murder, designed and devised for the specific purpose of killing someone. It is almost what happened to President Trump. Since assassinations of a political nature are subject to investigations about the nature of the plots, looking at possible conspiracies, perhaps the same should be done with the matter of the massacre of the unborn, whose body count has surpassed one billion dead babies since Communist Russia legalized the practice. Who is behind this campaign of assassination? It’s the communists, the same people we thought had captured the thinking of the pope. Has the pope changed? Perhaps. But he is also reaffirming Catholic teaching about the value of human life. It’s true he placed his comments about assassinating the unborn in the context of criticizing both U.S. presidential candidates, saying Harris is “the one who kills children” and Trump is “the one who throws away migrants.” But his remarks about Trump make no sense, since there is a Border Wall around the Vatican and the pope doesn’t welcome “migrants” into his city-state. Trespassers into the Vatican are deported. All that Trump is doing is protecting the sovereignty of the United States, in the same way the Pope protects his own people. It’s blatant hypocrisy for the pope to criticize Trump for something he does. Francis is trying to straddle the political fence, leaving the choice to the American people to decide between the baby-killer and Trump. He claims both are against life. Trump’s position on abortion is not ideal, since he has moved left, but it is clearly superior to the baby-killing policies of Kamala Harris. Hence, the official Catholic recommendation on November 5 must be to vote for Trump over Harris. Such a position will leave liberal Catholics confused and demoralized. The liberal media are already perplexed. How could the pope NOT endorse Kamala Harris and the Democrats? Perhaps the pope, in addition to gaining a deeper understanding of the Catholic teaching he is supposed to safeguard, read the great book Witness, by the former communist Whittaker Chambers. It also had a big impact on Ronald Reagan. In that classic, Chambers described how he became pro-life and left communism when he came to the realization that his pregnant wife was having a baby with an independent life and soul and that the child was not just property, to be disposed of when inconvenient. “Philosophically speaking, I am in favor of the right to life,” declared Argentinian President Javier Milei, incorporating Catholic teaching in his comments. “Beyond that, there is a scientific justification to be had. It’s the fact that life begins at conception, it’s at that very instant that a new being begins to evolve with its own unique DNA,” Milei said. “Beyond that, there is a matter of mathematics,” he explained. “Life is a continuum with two quantum leaps: birth and death. Any interruption in the interim is murder.” This seems to be the pope’s position. Even more significant than the use of the term “murder,” however, the pope uses the term “assassination.” That means the pope is prepared, presumably, to use the resources of the Vatican to pursue what the anti-communist Pope John Paul II called the “Culture of Life.” He made an alliance with Ronald Reagan to fight communism. Has Pope Francis had a Damascus Road conversion, away from Marxism? That is the hope. What we should do, as Catholics and non-Catholics, is demand exposure of the conspiracy against life, as reflected in the assassination campaign against the unborn, and demand prosecution of the abortionists and the mothers who seek to kill innocent human life. This may sound harsh to some, but when one billion human lives have been snuffed out, what is the alternative? Do the innocent unborn deserve anything less than a defense of their human rights under God to live?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |