She said she didn’t want to stay home and bake cookies. And
she didn’t. A radical feminist with a
background in Marxist dogma and Communist connections, Senator Hillary Rodham
Clinton is today wielding national power
and may be on her way back to the White House -- this time as President. This
is so despite the fact that her name is associated with many
Clinton is also associated with the fiasco dubbed “Hillarycare,”
In the Senate, Mrs. Clinton can
be expected to push several radical U.N. treaties and move
Cliff Kincaid Biography
A veteran journalist and commentator, Cliff Kincaid, 46, is the President of America’s Survival, Inc., and has been based in the Washington, D.C.-area for more than twenty years. His books include Michael New: Mercenary or American Soldier, which examines the case of the U.S. soldier courtmartialed for refusing to wear a U.N. uniform; and The New United Nations’ Global Welfare Giveaway, on the push for Third World “debt relief.” A controversial and frequent guest on radio and television, he was a guest co-host on CNN’s Crossfire and has hosted several national radio programs.
Mrs. Clinton To Run For White House
Hillary Biographer, the late Barbara Olson, says Mrs. Clinton’s roots are Marxist
author of Hell to Pay. The Unfolding
Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton (Regnery
Publishing, Inc. 1999), is a prominent
Q: Do you believe that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Marxist?
A: I believe she has a political ideology that has its roots in Marxism. In her formative years, Marxism was a very important part of her ideology...But when you look at her ideas on health and education, you see more government and less individual control. You see very little regard for families...
Q: Do you see Hillary as in favor of Socialist-style thinking at the global level?
We saw that with her activities as First Lady. She traveled more than any other
First Lady. She had a global view. She spoke at the
Q: So you do believe that she will run for president?
I do. She believes her ideology to the core. She’s worked for it behind Bill
Clinton for years. I have thought that Hillary was going to run for the White House since 1993 when I started
Q: She portrays her causes such as children’s rights and women’s rights in such an attractive manner. She has put conservatives on the defensive once again.
A: She has. That’s the central focus of her public relations campaign...But her ideas about health care and education have very little to do with women and children. They are the lever she uses to bring the government into the family.
Q: She’s been pushing treaties such as the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. Isn’t she promoting global government?
A: Yes.We all know about her book, It Takes a Village. She says the future is not family but the larger village of teachers, pediatricians and social workers. She talks about raising children as less of a parental task than a social one...You have the destruction of the family unit. That’s very basic when you study Socialism and Marxism. (30)
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) believes in a world government under the auspices of the United Nations that will destroy American sovereignty and traditional families.
A media black-out has kept most Americans in the dark about the support that Mrs. Clinton and her husband gave to the World Federalist Association (WFA), a controversial organization which openly advocates world government. The WFA says that by adding more power, authority and functions to the United Nations, “national sovereignty would be gradually eroded until it is no longer an issue.”  The group promotes “global citizenship” and such international agencies as the International Criminal Court (ICC), a “World Disarmament Authority” to control the weapons of the world, nuclear and even small arms; and an independent “peacekeeping” army for the U.N.
In its final days, the Clinton Administration signed the U.N. treaty to create an ICC, which could prosecute and imprison Americans for alleged war crimes. President Clinton had initially opposed the treaty, because of Pentagon fears the court would go after American military personnel, but he approved it anyway. 
Another key objective of those devoted to world government is to defeat or derail President George W. Bush’s plan to deploy a national missile defense system. National missile defense makes a U.N.-sponsored “World Disarmament Authority” unnecessary and unwise. If we can protect and defend ourselves, we don’t need the U.N. to do it for us through global bureaucracies and treaties. Missile defense reaffirms national security and survival.
Both the Russians and the Chinese have advocated a U.N. ban on a missile defense system, and U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan has argued that missile defense “poses a serious threat to the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty” and threatens “strategic stability.” 
Annan, however, has not been critical of the Russian anti-missile system and Russian violations of that treaty. Former CIA/DIA official William T. Lee’s book  proves that the Russians have already violated the ABM treaty by integrating thousands of dual purpose anti-aircraft weapons with large radars that provide warnings of a missile attack. Lee says the Russians are set to obtain a big strategic advantage if they continue to improve their nuclear arsenal and if we continue to adhere to the discredited ABM treaty.
Such an imbalance puts
While the Clinton
Administration postponed deployment of a
missile defense system and ultimately embraced the ICC, it also rushed ahead
with the U.N. military agenda, issuing a
secret Presidential Decision Directive (PDD-25) deploying our troops to the
world organization and prosecuting Army
soldier Michael New for bad conduct for refusing to wear a U.N. uniform and
report to a foreign U.N. commander.
Mrs. Clinton is best known for her support of the radical U.N. agenda that affects families, women and children.
One of Mrs. Clinton’s favorite U.N. agencies, the U.N. Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), has a slogan, “Women Hold Up Half the Sky,” which was used during the age of Chinese Communist mass murderer Mao Tse Tung  to highlight the role of women in the Communist revolution. Mrs. Clinton adopted the slogan as her own in a speech to the U.N. 
Over the years, she has given several speeches at U.N. events, including an address at a 1995 “women’s conference” in Communist China, where human rights are severely curtailed and Christians are persecuted. 
Although a woman’s reproductive
rights are controlled by the state in
U.N. Boss Kofi Annan’s wife, Nane, the “First Lady of the United Nations” and an ally of Hillary Clinton.
The U.N.’s radical agenda in
both social and military affairs is embraced by the World Federalist
Association, which hosted the then-First Lady on
During the historic stand-off
At the time, the Soviets were trying to defeat the Reagan conventional and nuclear arms build-up and policy of supporting anti-Communist freedom fighters.
In particular, the WFA and its officials strongly opposed the policy of assisting Nicaraguan freedom fighters who were opposing the Soviet- and
Nicaraguan Sandinista dictatorship. A suit filed by the WFA with the U.N.’s
International Court of Justice had declared
From the start, the U.N. was viewed as an instrument of Communist policy. The U.N.’s first Secretary-General, who assumed the post in a temporary or acting capacity, was Soviet spy Alger Hiss, an official in President Franklin Roosevelt’s Administration. The new book, The Venona Secrets, documents how the founding conference of the U.N. in 1945, which Hiss attended, was “an important opportunity” for other members of a Soviet spy ring, including Roosevelt’s Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, Harry Dexter White, a Harvard economist whose policies produced the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. 
White, who also attended the U.N’s founding conference, gave the Soviets information on
the American delegation’s internal discussions  which enabled the Soviets
Oleg Kalugin, former chief of counterintelligence and major general in the Soviet KGB, says the Soviet mission to the U.N. became “little more than a nest of KGB spies and intelligence officers” and notes that he, Kalugin, was elected as vice-president of the U.N. Correspondents Association. 
There is no reason to believe
that the U.N. has ceased to be a massive base of espionage and intelligence
operations against the
Yet this is the organization that the WFA wants to transform into a global state with independent military, police and judicial powers.
Another prominent figure in the WFA was the late Alan Cranston, the far-left former California Senator who became chairman of the Gorbachev Foundation, named for the former Soviet President, Mikhail Gorbachev, who leads it. Cranston, himself accused of having a pro-Communist bent,  spoke on the subject of a “nuclear-free world” at the twentieth anniversary conference of the Council for Secular Humanism, which envisions “a future without religion.” 
Nevertheless, the WFA was a recipient of $15,000 in American taxpayer money from the $11 million-a-year Congressionally-funded U.S. Institute of Peace to analyze the prospect of “standing peace forces and peacekeeping reserves” for the U.N.; international tribunals; and a “world court on human rights.” 
When the organization was founded in
This event produced the United World Federalists (UWF), whose first president, Cord Meyer, Jr. (1947-1949), had served as chief of the International Organizations Division of the CIA. The UWF board included such figures as Albert Einstein, the renowned physicist who “never wavered from his basic conviction that only a world government could secure peace,”  but who has subsequently been linked to Soviet intelligence. 
Today, the World Federalist Movement, as it’s called, features strong
backing from U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who says, “Your movement has helped keep alive for fifty years the values which inspire the creation of the United Nations...”
sister organization, the Campaign for U.N. Reform (CUNR), endorsed or
financially supported dozens of
Congressional candidates. Don Kraus, executive director of the group,
says that over 60 percent of those candidates in the 2000 election won their
races. CUNR drafted legislation for Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) authorizing
Some of CUNR’s more prominent victories in the House were Rep. David Bonior (D-Mich.), a leader of House Democrats, and Rep. Jim Leach (R-Iowa), a member of the International Relations Committee. In the Senate, victories include Dianne Feinstein (D-Ca.), Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), Paul Sarbanes (D-Md.), Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), and James Jeffords (R-Vt.).
With the loss of several prominent conservatives, such as Senator John Ashcroft, a strong opponent of the International Criminal Court, the evidence suggests that the U.N. lobby is stronger than ever on Capitol Hill and that Senator Clinton could emerge as its champion.
U.N. treaties which have remained dormant in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee could be forced to the Senate floor for a quick vote. Mrs. Clinton might be able to persuade just enough liberal or “moderate” Republicans to ratify these documents.
Clinton’s appearance before the WFA marked the third time that a prominent
Talbott, a former columnist for Time magazine, wrote a column entitled “The Birth of the Global Nation,” arguing that in the next century “nationhood as we know it will be obsolete,” that we would all some day become world citizens, and that wars and human rights violations in the 20th century had clinched “the case for world government.” 
Hillary Clinton and Strobe Talbott had been friends at
In his message to the group, dated
Mrs. Clinton’s address was
delivered in the context of commending Walter Cronkite, the former anchorman of
the CBS Evening News, and the WFA. Cronkite, who received the WFA’s 1999 global governance award, declared that “we must
strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government” and
Cronkite also called for passage of several U.N. treaties, including:
• The treaty to ban land mines ;
• The Law of the Sea Treaty;
• The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty; 
• The Convention to Eliminate All Forms of Discrimination Against Women;
• The Convention on the Rights of the Child; and
• The treaty for a permanent International Criminal Court.
As Senator from
The Clinton Administration
resisted the land mine treaty under Pentagon pressure because it would outlaw mines on the border
between North and
As a Senator, Mrs. Clinton can
ignore that kind of pressure. As First Lady, she had been a vigorous supporter
of so-called ad hoc U.N. criminal courts, such as the International Criminal
In addition to Mrs. Clinton’s glowing remarks about him, Cronkite was presented at the WFA affair with an award “honoring his support of world government” by WFA President and CEO John Anderson, a former Republican Congressman and independent candidate for president.
The event was held at the U.N. and videotaped by the U.N. Department of Public Information.
In his book, A Reporter’s Life, Cronkite says that if we are to avoid a global nuclear war, “a system of world order -- preferably a system of world government -- is mandatory.” 
Though described as “the most
trusted man in
Another WFA fellow traveler is Richard J. Barnet, a member of the WFA board of advisers, who is a founder of the controversial Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), a Marxist-oriented think tank. 
Journalist and author Brian Crozier wrote in National Review that IPS “is the perfect intellectual front for Soviet activities which would be resisted if they were to originate openly from the KGB.” 
S. Steven Powell’s book on IPS includes actual photographs of identified
Soviet agents who attended IPS functions or associated with IPS personalities. He names two as KGB officers. 
Samuel Rubin, a member of the
Communist Party and a Russian emigre, founded the Rubin Foundation, which provided the
bulk of IPS’s funding.  His daughter, Cora Weiss,
worked with the IPS and organized anti-Vietnam War activities at the request of
the Communist Hanoi government.  Weiss was the President of
the Hague Appeal for Peace Conference,
Robert Borosage, who served as director of IPS, was “a colleague and close acquaintance” of Hillary Clinton, according to Barbara Olson’s book, Hell to Pay. 
Olson writes that Mrs. Clinton
operated in the “reaches of the left including Robert Treuhaft
and Jessica Mitford,” who had been “committed
Communists” and “Stalinists.”  Olson says that Hillary worked for Treuhaft and paved the way for Mitford
to lobby then-Governor Bill
Olson described Hillary as a “budding Leninist” who understood the Leninist concept of acquiring, accumulating and maintaining political power at any cost. 
However, Olson also writes that:
“Hillary has never repudiated
her connection with the Communist movement in
In college, Hillary Clinton expressed admiration for an article written by a 1960s SDS student protest leader, described as a Marxist or Maoist, who “defended Ho Chi Minh and Castro, and Maoist tactics of violence.” 
Over the last several years, as
First Lady of the
In one of several speeches over the years to U.N. agencies and events, Hillary hailed Abzug’s work and career. 
When Mrs. Clinton was urged not to attend the women’s conference in Communist China, because of human rights problems there, Abzug was among those saying she should go.  Mrs. Clinton went.
was a member of several Communist Party front groups. When Abzug
ran for congress, the Socialist Party opposed her for having shown “a general
unwillingness to be outspokenly critical of Communist actions threatening the
peace and freedom of the world.” Abzug opposed allowing Vietnamese refugees to come to the
Abzug, a long-time feminist, also favored federal financing of 24-hour-a-day child care centers. 
At a U.N. public tribute, described as an “unprecedented use” of the U.N. General Assembly, personalities such as Jane Fonda, Shirley MacLaine, Phil Donahue, and
Timothy Wirth, former senator and a former assistant secretary of state who became head of Ted Turner’s U.N. Foundation, paid homage to Abzug.
U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan described Abzug as “a fixture at the United Nations during this past decade...” and said that “All of us here today” were influenced by Abzug’s organization. Her legacy “shall endure,” he said.
Senator Mary Landrieu (D-La.) called Abzug “a unique and effective spokesperson for women,” and that she, Landrieu, had been “influenced” by her and was a friend. 
was reported to be an “active Zionist” during her collegiate days, she went on
Mrs. Clinton flip-flopped in the
opposite direction. Olson noted that she has “a lifetime record of support for
the Palestine Liberation Organization,”  which had once been labeled
a terrorist organization. But during her run for the Senate, in an effort to
attract Jewish votes, Mrs. Clinton denounced “Chairman Arafat,” the head of the
PLO, and called on him to “end the violence” engulfing the region. She called
for a peace agreement “that guarantees
a “guarantee” may consist of
• Defended the Clinton-NATO war on
• Supported normal trade relations
• Urged payment of “our dues” to the U.N.; 
• Called on “international organizations” to ensure “fair labor standards” and “environmental protection” around the world;
• Urged the G-8 group of countries and the World Bank to tackle the issues of illiteracy, foreign debt, and AIDS;
• Recommended passage of a U.N. treaty on international organized crime and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.
Despite Mrs. Clinton’s attempt
to portray herself as a friend of
Mrs. Clinton chaired the group during a time, 1982-1988, when it also gave grants to the Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador (CISPES), a front group for the Communist terrorists; the National Lawyers Guild, identified as a Communist front; and the Christic Institute,  an extreme left-wing group of lawyers which practiced “legal terrorism” against citizens, retired military and intelligence officials, and others who were perceived to be supporting the cause of freedom from Communism in Central America. 
But as Abzug’s support for federal day-care centers illustrates, the extreme left has always supported causes which have the same potential as the growth of Communism to alter American society. The target has usually been the traditional family.
In the same way that Mrs. Clinton promoted a federal takeover of the health care system, her promotion of feminism and “children’s rights” serves to promote government control of family life and the raising of children. Mrs. Clinton, whose book, It Takes a Village, promotes less parental involvement with children, shares Abzug’s belief in a national network of federally-financed day-care centers where professional bureaucrats and “educators” take control of the lives of the young.
It is significant that Mrs. Clinton, in a speech to a U.N. conference on population issues, also spoke favorably of Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, for her “family planning” work.  Although Sanger has been portrayed as a fighter for women’s rights, she abandoned her family while her marriage was collapsing in order to push the birth control cause. Sanger was a Socialist and a racist, having made brazen pronouncements in favor of population control programs targeting blacks and other minorities as “human weeds.” A central focus of her work was getting the U.S. Government to endorse and promote her work.
The clear intention of the birth control movement from the start was not to give individuals the right to make decisions, in the privacy of their own bedrooms, but rather to empower government to regulate and control human beings.
The radical feminists do not support family planning but family control. The real purpose of so-called “reproductive rights” is to control the size of families. When the feminists talk about “educating” young women about their rights, the aim is to made sure that they choose contraception, abortion or sterilization, and avoid motherhood. Another popular U.N. phrase, “improving women’s status,” is another way of saying that women will be less likely to have children if they are forced into the career world.
Under the Clinton
Feminism to Communism
The scheduling of the 1995 U.N. Fourth World Conference on Women in Communist China was controversial but no accident. It is relevant to what the U.N. planners and the feminists have in mind for the world.
Not too far from the five-star hotel where the feminists were meeting, baby girls and boys were being starved to death at Communist Chinese orphanages. Pictures of this brutality were smuggled out of the country by Human Rights Watch. One showed an emaciated 11 year-old girl tied down to a bed withering away to nothing. A British film about the problem, The Dying Rooms, showed children tied to wooden toilets, sleeping in their own excrement. One British reporter was shocked to find a baby hidden away in a towel and being allowed to die.
These children were fortunate; they were allowed to live -- for a while.
undergo abortions and sterilization to comply with the state-mandated one-child per-family policy. If a mother has more than one child, government benefits can be taken away or her children killed outright.
If the U.N. program is completely implemented on a world-wide basis, population control could be a more efficient way of running peoples’ lives than Communism. Indeed, population control may be more of a danger than Communism because it is packaged so attractively as something that will benefit women and even save the planet’s resources.
Mrs. Clinton has already left her mark on the federal government and its policies, which also affect the private sector. As First Lady, Hillary was involved in creating the President’s Interagency Council for Women, described by her as an effort “to ensure that every single government agency works to fulfill the promises that we made in Beijing” at the U.N.’s Fourth World Conference on Women.
The council was “charged with
coordinating the implementation of the Platform of Action adopted at
Rather than submit the “Platform of Action” to the Senate in the form of a treaty for ratification, the White House moved to implement it unilaterally. The Council was comprised of representatives of 30 different federal agencies and offices, as well as the World Bank. Like Hillary’s Socialized medicine task force, they worked largely in secret to radicalize the government and its policies, even as they affected private business.
Hillary Clinton served as
honorary chair of the council, and Secretary of Health and Human Services Donna Shalala, who served
as co-chair of the official
While it is impossible to determine with certainty how many rules and regulations were imposed as part of this effort, a General Accounting Office (GAO) study found that 13 different federal agencies, without congressional approval, had spent about $5.9 million on the 1995 conference itself and an associated forum for non-governmental organizations, most of them feminist groups.
One of the seven “commitments”
made by the
One provision of the document calls for “equal remuneration” for “work of equal value,” which is a “comparable worth” scheme amounting to what Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) calls “government wage control.” Hence, CEDAW is a rationale for the Socialization of the economy in the name of “women’s rights.”
One might think there would be no chance of getting the U.S. Senate to ratify such a radical measure. But this view ignores the political power of the “gender gap” - the perception that conservatives are on the wrong side of so-called women’s issues.
Conservatives can reformulate the political debate and expose the U.N. as a global instrument of discrimination against women, especially mothers who want to have and raise children. The Achilles heel of CEDAW is Article 16, Section 1 (e), which requires governments to allow women “to decide freely and responsibly on the number and spacing of their children.” (emphasis added).
This rather innocuous-sounding provision can be interpreted to mean not only abortion on demand but forced abortion if a government requires it.
It is significant that Communist China has interpreted CEDAW to allow its practice of compulsory abortion.
the Convention on the Rights of the Child, which is strongly backed by
Conservative activist and lawyer Phyllis Schlafly notes that the treaty asserts no rights for parents,  while Focus on the Family says the treaty would elevate children’s rights over parental authority
The treaty also asserts that children should be “brought up in the spirit of the ideals proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations...” 
Back in 1973, notes Clinton biographer Barbara Olson, Mrs. Clinton had herself written on the topic, expressing a “contemptuous tone toward the family” in a 1973 Harvard Educational Review article comparing marriage to slavery and living on an Indian reservation. Olson says it is apparent that Hillary’s early writings were shaped by academic Marxism and
feminism  and that she opposes “patriarchy.”
However, Hillary completely
flip-flopped on the “children’s rights” issue when her Administration supported
the return of Cuban refugee boy Elian Gonzalez to his father and Communist
Cuba. He had been rescued at sea after his mother had fled Communism to seek a
life of freedom in the
Mrs. Clinton also favors more federal and even global control over the educational system. However, federal control has already proceeded at a rapid rate, and both major presidential candidates in the 2000 election, Al Gore and George W. Bush, favored even more federal spending on education, a traditional local responsibility. Bush spoke of local control but “accountability” to the federal government.
There is major concern that a new education package coming out of Congress could reflect Mrs. Clinton’s influence and be hijacked by the radical left.
One reported candidate for
Secretary of Education, even in a Republican Bush Administration, was said to
be Democratic Governor James Hunt of
In a November 11, 1992, letter to Mrs. Clinton, the group’s president, Marc S. Tucker, had hailed the election of the Clintons in 1992, and said that he had just left David Rockefeller’s office in jubilation over what could be accomplished. Tucker then laid out a plan to impose control over the educational system for the purpose of making students into workers in the global economy. 
In 1990-1991, the NCEE paid Mrs. Clinton $101,630 -- payments that came under the scrutiny of New York State Attorney General Dennis Vacco.  It was unclear if Hillary got the money personally or if the funds went to Mrs. Clinton’s Rose law firm.
Dr. Dennis Cuddy, a former senior associate in the Department of Education under President Reagan, says the plan is modeled on how former Soviet-bloc countries managed “human resource development” in their educational
Another NCEE board member was Ira Magaziner, who helped Hillary create her Socialized medicine plan. Hillary and Magaziner in 1992 wrote an article in Education Leadership about channeling students into selected jobs by granting them each a “certificate of initial mastery” for certain skills.
The Education Reporter newsletter says the goal is to achieve “interlocking control over both the public school system and the nation’s economy.”  Under this workforce development scheme, students are guided or even coerced into a career path, from which it is difficult to change, as early as the eighth grade. These decisions are made by educators and bureaucrats in collaboration with corporate and governmental needs.
In common parlance, the approach has come to be known as “Outcome-Based education” and “School-to-work” educational schemes.
This is in direct contrast to the traditional view of education, which holds that students should be given a well-rounded education and become independent and intelligent so they can pursue their own career choices. Traditional education holds that students should be given academic skills and an essential body of knowledge, presented in a context of moral absolutes.
A key aspect of the new approach
to education is to downplay such areas as
• A federal survey discovered that
only 41 percent of 4th graders could correctly answer a multiple choice
question on why the Pilgrims came to
• A survey of teenagers found that
while 75 percent knew the city with the 90210 zip code, only 26 percent knew
the U.S. Constitution was written in
• A survey of seniors from
An example of this new approach to education
can be found in the Exploris middle school in
Consultants to Exploris included “global education experts” such as Charlotte Anderson of Education for Global Involvement (EGI) and Andrew Smith of The American Forum for Global Education (TAF).
EGI works with the U.N. Association to promote “Model U.N.” programs in public schools, in which students learn about the organization by acting like ambassadors. TAF distributes a publication, The United Nations, Come Along with Me!, conceived and written by Nane Annan, the wife of the U.N. Secretary-General, and designed to introduce second and third grade children to the U.N.
Dennis Cuddy says the
But it is a nationwide problem.
certificate-like form that has the U.N. logo at the top.
At the World Economic Forum, Mrs. Clinton described how her husband had spoken of their educational scheme “providing better educational opportunities, so that we have more of our people trained so they can take the jobs that are available in the global economy.” 
But Mrs. Clinton was never content to operate in her husband’s shadow. In a question-and-answer session after the speech, she was asked if she thought it was time for “a strong, brilliant woman” to be U.S. President. “Yes,” she said, “and I look forward to voting for her.” 
Is Mrs. Clinton that candidate?
Her critics have frequently been wrong about her plans and abilities. Radio
entertainer Rush Limbaugh, for instance, never thought she would run for the
Senate, and many conservatives believed Mrs. Clinton, a carpetbagger, would
lose the race to Rep. Rick Lazio, a native New Yorker with a “moderate” reputation. However,
One mark on her record is her
Socialized medicine scheme, unveiled in the first Clinton-Gore term, which went down to a disastrous defeat. That was primarily because
some elements of the insurance and medical industries had strongly opposed it.
Domestically, Mrs. Clinton has discovered that Socialism in health care must be implemented on an incremental basis. She has also learned that she must enlist Big Business in her radical crusades.
Hillary addressed the U.S.
Chamber of Commerce on
It may seem curious that the
Chamber, a pro-business group, should be so cozy with Hillary Clinton, who had
tried to foist that Socialize medicine scheme on its members. But the Chamber
received millions of taxpayer dollars through the National Endowment for
Democracy (NED) and has advocated trading
Hillary gave special thanks to Chamber President Tom Donohue and Clinton Ambassador Craig Johnstone, who became senior vice-president for the Chamber.
Curiously, Mrs. Clinton has also enlisted important elements of the U.S. Catholic Church in her pro-U.N. crusade.
Although she is in favor of
abortion on demand, including partial birth abortion, she celebrated the 50th anniversary of the
U.N.’s Declaration of Human Rights, also dubbed “Human Rights Day,” with a speech at
As First Lady, Mrs. Clinton made a regular practice of celebrating “Human Rights Day.” She didn’t devote as much
attention to the “Bill of Rights Day,” December 15. This is the anniversary of the
ratification of the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
Eleanor Roosevelt, wife of
President Franklin D. Roosevelt, chaired the U.N. commission that drafted the
U. N. Declaration of Human Rights and she served as the
Mrs. Roosevelt, like Mrs. Clinton, was betrayed and embarrassed by her husband, who carried on extramarital affairs. And although Eleanor Roosevelt has been viewed as an activist for women’s rights, she conducted a lesbian relationship with Lorena Hickok, a reporter who covered FDR’s presidential campaign. 
Mrs. Clinton tried to “communicate” with Mrs. Roosevelt through a “channeling” session or voodoo-like seance arranged by Jean Houston of the Foundation for Mind Research Though she favors the use of LSD
some settings to facilitate spirituality, there is no evidence
Although Senator Trent Lott
(R-La.) has said that Senator Clinton will “have to get used” to being but one
of 100 members of the U.S. Senate, some members were still said to be
suspicious that “she’s using the Senate as a steppingstone for the presidency.”
 The Genius of Federation: Why World Federation is The Answer To Global Problems, World Federalist Association, undated.
 Pressure came from the World Federalist Association, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.
 Secretary-General Stresses
Immediate Need for New and Effective Measures for Nuclear Disarmament and
 William T. Lee, The ABM Treaty Charade: A Study in Elite Illusion and Delusion, (Washington, D.C.: Council for Economic and Social Studies, 1997)).
 See Michael New: Mercenary or American Soldier, Daniel New and Cliff Kincaid, 1998.
 The Black Book of Communism (Harvard University Press, 1999) estimates that Mao’s policies killed up to 63 million people.
 UNIFEM Luncheon. Remarks by
First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton. United Nations,
 In November-December 2000,
more than 200 “illegal” Christian churches and other places of worship were
reportedly demolished in
 Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-Tung, (New York: Bantam Books, 1967), page 170.
 WFA. World Federalist
Association. 1947-1997. Fiftieth Anniversary Historical Survey. World
 Herbert Romerstein
and Eric Breindel, The Venona
Secrets. Exposing Soviet Espionage and
 Ibid., page 49.
 Oleg Kalugin, with Fen Montaigne. The First Directorate. My 32 Years in Intelligence and Espionage Against the West, (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994), pages 35, 41.
 In the book, The KGB Against the ‘Main Enemy,’ Herbert Romerstein and Stanislav Levchenko, report that Cranston, as an official of the U.S. Office of War Information in 1943, tried to downplay a Soviet human rights atrocity and admitted hiring a Communist writer.
 See Free Inquiry, published by the Council for Secular Humanism.
 See list of grants at www.usip.org
 WFA. World Federalist
Association. 1947-1997. Fiftieth Anniversary Historical Survey. World
 Uniting the Peoples and
 Ibid., Romerstein and Breindel, The Venona Secrets, pages 278-279.
 Strobe Talbott,
“The Birth of the Global Nation,” Time,
 Barbara Olson, Hell to Pay. The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton, (Regnery Publishing, Inc., Washington, D.C., 1999), page 57.
 News and Announcements. November 1999, http://www.wfa.org/announce2.html
 Known formally as the “Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and On Their Destruction.”
 Signed by President
Clinton, it was voted down, 51-48, by
the Senate on
 Hillary praised Princess Diana, patron of the campaign to ban land mines, for her “courage” and “persistence.”
 First Lady Hillary Rodham
Clinton. Statement at The International Criminal Tribunal for
 See Justice for the World Or Global Terror: The U.N.’s International Criminal Court, www.usasurvival.org
 Walter Cronkite, A Reporter’s Life, (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1996), page 128.
 CBS Continues Anti-Defense Record, AIM Report, April-A 1983.
 Over the years, the IPS has been exposed by various writers and authors, including this one. John and Sheila Rees have led the way in focusing critical attention on the organization, but authors Real Jean Isaac (The Coercive Utopians) and S. Steven Powell (Covert Cadre) did so as well.
 Brian Crozier, “Power and National Sovereignty,” National Review, February 2, 1979, page 166.
 S. Steven Powell, Covert Cadre. Inside the Institute for Policy Studies, (Ottawa, Illinois: Green Hill Publishers, Inc., 1987).
 Ibid., page 15.
 Ibid., pages 38-39.
 World Peace Through World Law. World Federalist Association Annual Report, 2000 Report on 1999 Activities, page 7.
 Ibid. , Olson, page 56.
 Ibid. page 62.
 Ibid. page 57.
 Bella Abzug, who died in March 1998, was a co-founder and co-chair of the Women's Environment & Development Organization (WEDO); an advisor for
the U.N. Development Program’s Human Development Report 1995; convenor of the Women's Caucus at the U.N.’s Social Summit; official delegate to the
International Conference on Population and Development and the UN General Assembly Special Session to the Earth
and recipient of numerous honors and awards, including the U.N. Environmental Program’s “Eyes on the Environment” award.
 The New Yorker,
 “Burying the Truth About Bella,” Accuracy in Media (AIM) Report, April-A 1998.
 Francis X. Gannon, Biographical Dictionary Of The Left, (Belmont, Massachusetts: Western Islands, 1972), pages 211-213.
 Ibid., Gannon, page 212.
 Ibid., Olson, page 17.
 Hillary Clinton, Council on
 There was never any
 Ibid., Olson, page 17.
 Ibid., page 132.
 “Legal Terrorism” is the title of Dr. Susan Huck’s book on the case, published in 1989 by New World Publishing Ltd.
 Hillary Clinton, The ICPD
 Phyllis Schlafly,
“Havoc lurking in children’s treaty,” The
 Convention on the Rights of the Child, Preamble.
 Ibid., Olson, page 107.
 See the letter at: www.eagleforum.org/educate/marc_tucker/marc_tucker_letter.html
 Frederic U. Dicker and
Gregg Birnbaum, N.Y. Att’y
General Probes First Lady,” The
 Interview, American Freedom
Network, Cliff Kincaid Show,
 “Hillary Letter Lays Out School-Workforce Plan,” Education Reporter, September 1995, Number 115.
 Testimony of Richard R. Beeman before the United States Senate Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, September 2, 1998.
 Inside Academe, American Council of Trustees and Alumni,Winter 2000, Vol. V.No. 2
 Hillary Rodham Clinton at
the Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum,
 see Twila Brase, “WHO’s Hidden Agenda,” Ideas on Liberty, The Foundation for Economic Education, Inc., December 2000, pages 8-11.
 Hillary Clinton, “Campaign
 The NED also funds the AFL-CIO and foreign policy institutes connected to the Democratic and Republican Parties.
 The two woman exchanged love letters that were published in Empty Without You: The Intimate Letters of Eleanor Roosevelt and Lorena Hickok.
 Audrey Hudson, “Hillary
will try to get along with past Senate foes,” The Washington Times,