The World War is Already Here
By Cliff Kincaid
“Tanks To Ukraine” is a headline on the Breitbart news site that is portrayed as possibly provoking World War III. A Drudge Report headline about “a fierce new step by the West” took me to CNN. “War in Ukraine pushes Doomsday Clock forward” is how Axios described it. This is scare-mongering propaganda designed to frighten the West into backing down, when a united front against Russian imperialism is now taking shape.
The first communist nation on the face of the earth, Russia is today run by the morally bankrupt remnants of the old Soviet KGB in alliance with billionaire oligarchs that currently uses the Russian Orthodox Church as a spiritual front for justifying Russian imperialism. The regime is so corrupt that it got caught doping its athletes.
Today, Russia uses its left-over nuclear weapons from the Soviet days to scare the West into backing down in support of a former Soviet republic fighting for its national independence. In terms of conventional weapons, the United States and its allies have the capability to make sure Ukraine prevails, if only the U.S. has the win to win. That is an open question with Biden, long committed to a New World Order, in charge.
Meanwhile, Mexican cartels working with Communist China pour drugs in, killing about 100,000 Americans a year. The China virus continues to kill and maim Americans, with hundreds dying every day.
Worldwide, more than 6.7 million people have died, with 1.1 million deaths in the U.S.
The China-Russia alliance against America and the West is on full display.
Yet, Biden Secretary of State Antony Blinken is expected to travel to China in early February, not to demand reparations but to ensure that “ties between our countries can resume the healthy and stable course of development,” according to a communist official.
We are already engaged in a World War whether authorities want to admit it or not.
The scope of the intelligence failure regarding Russia in particular was addressed by then-Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), who said on CNN’s Jake Tapper show on April 12, 2016, that the U.S. government had badly “misjudged” the intentions of former KGB colonel Vladimir Putin “for many, many years.” He declared, “The biggest intelligence failure that we have had since 9/11 has been the inability to predict the leadership plans and intentions of the Putin regime in Russia.”
After the Russian invasion of Georgia in 2008, Nunes noted, the U.S. continued to engage diplomatically with the Russians, and “we continued to talk to the Russians, and then they invaded Eastern Ukraine.”
“We missed that,” he said. “And then we completely missed entirely when they put a new base, a new base with aircraft into the Mediterranean, into Syria. We just missed it. We were blind.”
After that, Russian invaded Ukraine under Obama in 2014, taking Crimea.
America’s current problem is having a weak Democratic president who seemed to dismiss an invasion of Ukraine as a minor “incursion,” then declared he was opposed to Russian aggression, but has failed to deliver the right kind of weapons Ukraine needs on a timely basis.
The Abrams main battle tanks for Ukraine announced by Biden should have been delivered months ago. Fighter jets should have been delivered months ago as well.
“This is about helping Ukraine defend and protect Ukrainian land. It is not an offensive threat to Russia,” said the weak-kneed and weak-willed Joe Biden. He’s afraid to “provoke” Putin.
Ukraine is waging a defensive war when it should have the offensive capability to take the fight to Russia itself.
Republican Senator Tom Cotton notes, “The Biden administration has finally relented and will send 31 American-made Abrams tanks to Ukraine. This decision is welcome, but it comes too late to help the Ukrainians as they prepare for a renewed Russian onslaught this spring. It illustrates, once again, how President Joe Biden’s half measures have made the war in Ukraine longer and bloodier than it should have been.”
Bur rather than take to heart the wisdom of Devin Nunes about the intelligence community misjudging Putin, failed Republican congressional candidate Joe Kent says support for Ukraine is “a huge payday for the military industrial complex” and now wants to run again, on a peace with Russia platform. He represents the Stephen K. Bannon and Tucker Carlson wing of the conservative movement.
As a military veteran, Joe Kent has to know that the “military-industrial complex” serves a valid purpose -- national defense -- and that China, Russia, and radical Islam, especially Iran, are among the major threats.
Joe Kent lost his bid to represent Southwest Washington in Congress, a seat previously held by a Republican.
Joe Kent’s wife became the first woman killed in combat against ISIS on January 16, 2019, and he accepted an award in her honor. The award is named for a woman who help the French resistance against Nazi Germany.
Kent should know that Islamic terrorism is directly linked to the old KGB, and that the old KGB runs Russia today. What is needed in the face of this threat is resistance as well.
Joe Kent, Stephen K. Bannon, and Tucker Carlson mock Ukraine’s fight for survival and complain about $100 billion spent on weapons for Ukraine.
If arms shipments to Ukraine are in fact resulting in a serious shortage of arms and ammunition in NATO member states, the answer is to rebuild our so-called “military-industrial complex.” National defense is a constitutional requirement.
I am old enough to remember that, faced with the aggressive designs of the Soviet empire, President Ronald Reagan spent billions of dollars on anti-communist guerrilla groups in Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East. It was called the Reagan Doctrine. Not all of these efforts were ultimately successful because the communists regrouped in many of those places, such as Nicaragua. But the key point is that what we are spending today in Ukraine is a piddling amount.
Aid to Ukraine should continue and be increased. But why is Biden sending foreign aid to communist South Africa, a Russian ally? China-Russia-South Africa joint military drills, named Operation Mosi, are scheduled to take place from February 17 to 26. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was just welcomed by his South African counterpart in Pretoria, South African Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor, where they declared the advent of a new “global order.”
An AFP story quoted Pandor as thanking Lavrov for the “most wonderful meeting” after the talks, which will “strengthen the already good relations” between the two countries. She described Russia as a “valued partner.”
Yet, Biden had declared, when he hosted President Ramaphosa of South Africa, “The United States and South Africa and your government have the same value set.” He added, “South Africa is a vital voice on the global stage and a leader in the international order.”
Incredibly, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen was just in South Africa, declaring the U.S. is seeking to deepen its “economic integration” with South Africa.
What America needs is a new version of the Reagan Doctrine, singling out communist governments for confrontation, even regime change. That means cutting off foreign aid to countries like South Africa. That means letting Israel take care of the Iranian nuclear bomb problem.
These are all serious threats. After devoting his entire political career to creating a New World Order, Biden was forced by the invasion of Ukraine to confront just one of them, in a half-hearted manner.
With the arrest of a former top FBI counterintelligence official who was involved in the Trump-Russia collusion investigation, Congress now has to actively pursue the issue of the U.S. intelligence community being infiltrated by Russian agents.
In regard to Ukraine, however, there is some good news -- the U.S., Germany, Britain, Poland, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, Spain and Portugal have now agreed to send tanks to destroy Russia’s forces in eastern Ukraine. But is it too little too late?
In the face of all these foreign threats, the solution is to confront them all. Major impediments to a solution are China Joe and the pro-Russia wing of the "conservative" movement.
Joe Biden’s Great Replacement
By Cliff Kincaid
When anti-communist analysts and security experts examined Barack Hussein Obama’s history of associations with unsavory characters and communist figures, they had to wonder if Obama is a Marxist mole or a communist collaborator. In one sense, it didn’t matter. As a candidate, Obama didn’t have to undergo a background security check. As president, however, he had instant access to our most closely guarded and classified state secrets. His fingerprints are all over the “Obama-Biden” documents discovered in various places under the control of Joe.
Obama’s 30-year history of associating with unsavory characters, beginning with communist Frank Marshall Davis and continuing with Jeremiah Wright and communist terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, should have disqualified him from getting a security clearance in the government that he wanted to run. But no official vetting of Obama was ever done and he didn’t require or even need a security clearance.
This is truly a major loophole in our constitutional system. It resulted in the election of our first Marxist president.
As we have noted on numerous occasions, candidates for federal office, in contrast to federal employment, do not undergo any background checks at all.
So while more secret documents are being discovered in the possession of Joe Biden, they originate with the Obama Administration. That fact tells us all that we need to know.
As my group America’s Survival, Inc. has argued for years, it is mandatory and necessary to begin addressing what an old congressional committee used to call “un-American activities” at the highest levels of the U.S. Government.
Until the Congress re-launches such a committee and examines what led to the rise of Barack Hussein Obama, the issue of Joe Biden’s classified documents could result in Biden’s demise while empowering the man behind the curtain, Obama himself.
It looks like Obama wants Joe to step aside so that his wife Michelle can run for president in 2024. A Joel Gilbert film explores this possibility. Or else he is prepared to back Maryland’s first black Governor, Wes Moore, a vocal proponent of the marijuana industry, as a candidate. Like Obama in 2008, Moore was backed by Oprah.
The documents scandal isn’t just a problem for Joe, as the media suggest. These were from Obama’s period of time as president. So what role, if any, are Obama’s people playing in this documents scandal?
Podcaster Joe Rogan says, “I don’t know jack ---- about politics, but if I had to guess -- they’re trying to get rid of him [Biden]. My guess would be they’re trying to get rid of him.” Who’s they?
Here’s where the story gets interesting.
The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) issued a statement on August 12 declaring it had “assumed exclusive legal and physical custody of Obama Presidential records when President Barack Obama left office in 2017, in accordance with the Presidential Records Act (PRA).” NARA said it “moved approximately 30 million pages of unclassified records to a NARA facility in the Chicago” and that NARA “maintains the classified Obama Presidential records in a NARA facility in the Washington, DC, area.”
So how did the Obama classified records find their way into Joe Biden’s office and garage? The answer has to be that Obama and/or his people held onto some of them. What this shows is that NARA was either misled by Obama-Biden or misled the public and the press in order for Attorney General Merrick Garland to single out Trump for scrutiny.
Anders Hagstrom of Fox News wrote a fascinating story noting that the National Archives responded to questions about presidential documents on October 11, less than a month before classified documents would be found at the Biden think tank in Washington. NARA claimed at this point that all documents from Obama administration had been "securely moved" to locations that met “strict archival and security standards.”
The question bears repeating: So how did the Obama classified records find their way into Joe Biden’s office and garage?
My hunch is that Obama holdovers acquired and planted them.
Jeff Poor of Breitbart noticed an interview given by Rep. Jerry Carl (R-AL) about Biden being “set up” by his own people. Carl said. “It’s almost like he’s being set up by his own people. They waited until after the election. They waited until after the Democrats lost a majority for this stuff to start leaking out. They knew it was there back in early November. Why didn’t they do it then when they had full control? All three houses could say it’s no big deal, whitewash and let’s move on. They didn’t.”
Carl added, “So, it’s almost like his own people are trying to destroy him at this point.”
I like the way Rep. Carl thinks. Except that it’s not “his own people.” These are mostly Obama’s people.
As we watch the Biden documents scandal unfold, look for another Obama waiting in the wings. It could be Michelle or Wes Moore.
“There is No Shortage of Cruelty”
By Cliff Kincaid
“There is no shortage of cruelty out there” is one of the comments in a public service announcement asking for donations to save animals. Pictures of dogs cowering for survival in a snow-filled landscape tug at your heart strings. How can people abuse and mistreat animals? But how can people do this to one another?
I saw the ad after the anti-abortion March for Life occurred in Washington, D.C. and news is breaking that the world is bracing for another massive Russian military assault on the people of Ukraine. Both events have one thing in common – the philosophy of atheistic communism.
Yet, the world seems indifferent to the fate of the unborn and the fate of Ukraine
Ex-Communist Whittaker Chambers explained how the abortion mentality was the communist mentality. “Abortion was a commonplace of party life,” he wrote in his classic 1952 work Witness. “There were Communist doctors who rendered that service for a small fee. Communists who were more choosy knew liberal doctors who would render the same service for a larger fee. Abortion, which now fills me with physical horror, I then regarded, like all Communists, as a mere physical manipulation.”
It was all physical because, in the communist view, there was nothing spiritual.
If we believe that humans deserve the right to live in peace and freedom, how can we defend abortion? And how can we remain indifferent to the fate of the people of Ukraine? These are two major issues that are front and center right now, far more important than a few classified documents left in Joe Biden’s garage.
In my view, those documents are relevant only in terms of what we already know about the Biden Administration – it is thoroughly compromised by our enemies, most prominently Russia and China.
Russian dictator Vladimir Putin hides behind the spiritual. Divorced and said to have a mistress, he has presented himself as a defender of the Christian faith and Christian values. He counts on conservatives in the United States to ignore the fact that he was a Soviet KGB officer and ran its successor, the FSB.
His apologists insist that Russian leaders have not only turned away from their communist past and involvement with the KGB, but are Bible-believing Christians today. But the Russian Orthodox Church, which backs the invasion of Ukraine, has been dominated by Putin’s old KGB and continues to serve the interests of the Kremlin. Former KGB officer Konstantin Preobrazhensky has called the Russian Orthodox Church “Putin’s Espionage Church,” and devotes a major portion of his book, KGB/FSB’s New Trojan Horse, to its use by the Russian intelligence service.
What’s worse, even as the pain and suffering continue, the West is divided over the issue of coming to the aid of Ukraine. Biden’s response has been too little too late, while Germany endlessly debates what weapons to provide. It seems that Germany is determined to preserve its relationship with Russia. This gives Russia another opportunity to inflict more devastation on Ukraine.
It is a well-known fact that Germany has consistently over the years failed to meet the NATO commitment of spending 2 percent of GDP on defense, causing former President Trump to conclude that “enough is enough,” in terms of Germany not doing enough to defend itself. Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, considered by some to be a Russian agent, made Germany more dependent on Russian oil and gas by terminating Germany’s nuclear energy program.
At a rally, Trump had declared, “We’re supposed to protect Germany from Russia, but Germany is paying Russia billions of dollars for energy coming from a pipeline, brand-new pipeline…How does that work?”
Remember that one of Biden’s first actions in office was to reverse the Trump approach and approve that Russian pipeline to Germany. It backfired. Was Russian influence over Joe and/or Hunter a factor? That’s reasonable to investigate. But the urgent matter before us is whether the United States will help this anti-communist nation resist what Putin has done to these people and what he has planned.
At the time, I had applauded the Trump approach to Germany. An American President had decided to move 10,000 American troops out of a deadbeat U.S. “ally,” already under Russian domination, from 34,500 to 25,000, moving them elsewhere.
Only a fool could argue for Americans troops on the soil of a European nation that had been falling into Putin’s hands anyway.
But everything changed under Biden, when he virtually encouraged a Russian invasion of its former Soviet republic, saying it might be only an "incursion," and has then failed to deliver the weapons Ukraine needs for victory.
Anti-communist conservatives in America have no alternative but to pressure the Biden Administration to deliver more and better weapons to Ukraine. To do otherwise is to deliver a nation back into the Russian empire and encourage a Chinese invasion of Taiwan.
Dismissing the war in Ukraine as a “regional conflict” only serves the interests of the Kremlin. This is a World War that involves not only Russia but its allies Communist China and Iran.
As the ad says, “There is no shortage of cruelty out there.” Spending less than a dollar a day helps save abandoned animals. Spending a few dollars every day will help save the people of Ukraine.
Whether the World War expands further depends on whether we can see beyond the issue of classified documents in a garage and understand how the cruelty of the communists, their allies and collaborators must be exposed and stopped now.
Who Planted the Biden Documents?
By Cliff Kincaid
Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) is suspicious, and so am I.
“Alleged classified documents showing up allegedly in the possession of Joseph Biden… I’m suspicious of the timing of it," Rep. Johnson told Fox News' Hillary Vaughn after a second batch of documents was found in the president's garage in Wilmington, Delaware, next to his Corvette. “I'm also aware of the fact that things can be planted on people…things can be planted in places and then discovered conveniently. That may be what has occurred here. I'm not ruling that out. But I’m open in terms of the investigation needs to be investigated.”
Planted by whom? More importantly, discovered by whom?
The question of discovery, or timing, is more important than who planted them, since they were discovered as Biden was about to launch a 2024 election bid and was already the subject of a “progressive” push to step down from the race. This is just too coincidental.
In early December, the "progressive" group Roots Action had unveiled a “Don’t Run Joe” campaign and proclaimed “…his prospects for winning re-election appear to be bleak. With so much at stake, making him the Democratic Party’s standard-bearer in 2024 would be a tragic mistake.”
Obama already passed a socialized medicine scheme, known as Obamacare, and Biden has passed much of his Green New Deal. But the inflation that resulted, as well as a recession, make Biden a liability. Plus, Biden's no-win war in Ukraine is a major liability.
Since Kamala Harris is a laughing stock, but the need is still great to have a black woman on the top of the ticket, the door is open for Michelle Obama. Joel Gilbert’s film examines this likelihood.
To return to the latest Biden scandal, keep in mind that these were Obama-Biden documents. It’s doubtful the Republicans had anything to do with planting them. That can be attributed to the Bidens. But it looks like Obama’s fingerprints are all over this.
When you hear or read about “Obama-Biden documents” or “Obama-era documents,” you know who’s likely pulling the strings behind this latest scandal. Biden doesn’t know what he’s doing. But Obama does.
And don’t you find it suspicious that this story emerged from major elements of the liberal media? CBS Evening News announced the “breaking news” on its January 9 program.
Piling on top of Biden, former Clinton Adviser David Gergen told CNN the classified documents scandal is a “gigantic story” and questioned why the president’s team did not make more of an attempt to get ahead of it.” Well, maybe it’s because Biden’s “team” includes many Obama holdovers who want to see Biden pull out of the 2024 presidential race.
Don’t forget that when Biden took office, the Associated Press noted the “swelling ranks of Obama officials in Biden’s orbit.” One estimate was that 60 Percent of Biden’s Cabinet appointments were Obama officials.
Yes, there are unanswered questions. But we know enough at this stage to understand what’s happening – Joe is out.
Going back to the AP story, “the reliance on Obama veterans carries risks.”
Sen. Mike Braun, R-Ind. released a 63-page report, “Joe Biden’s Groundhog Day: How the Swamp Keeps Coming Back, Again and Again,” about how Biden “recycled personnel from the Obama administration.” Some of the more high-profile officials in the Biden administration who used to work in the Obama administration include Susan Rice, John Kerry, and Ron Klain.
Susan Rice, director of the Domestic Policy Council, has been called the “power broker” and Politico noted, “She was too hot to touch even for some in her own party by the end of the Obama years, having become the chief protagonist in Republicans’ investigations into the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.” She ran Obama’s National Security Council and was implicated in the Benghazi terror attack cover-up.
Hence, the Braun report noted that Rice’s handling of Benghazi “disqualified her from consideration of additional posts requiring Senate confirmation.” For this reason, she was appointed to lead Biden’s Domestic Policy Council, “placing her in a quiet, but crucial role developing and driving the President’s domestic agenda.”
Rice was also implicated in illegally unmasking Trump campaign and post-election Trump transition officials in monitored conversations.
Clearly, Joe doesn't know what hit him. Even a Special Counsel investigation that finds him guilty of incompetence won't be good enough to save him. In fact, it will add fuel to the fire, as days, weeks, and months of investigations go by.
The Democratic Party knows that Joe will not survive politically. He cannot survive.
But depending on his mental state, Joe knows a lot about Democratic Party operations. He can’t be completely ruled out as a political survivor. Will he turn the tables on his former boss? And what would happen then?
Among the Obama holdovers, perhaps the most important is Merrick Garland, nominated by Obama to the Supreme Court but ending up as Biden’s Attorney General. He is Obama’s fixer.
Before YouTube terminated my channel, eliminating 500 videos from public view, I had analyzed the issue of then-judge Merrick Garland’s involvement in a court case brought by the Obama Administration to drop terrorism charges against a communist by the name of Elizabeth Anna Duke. She was a member of a Weather Underground spin-off that specialized in terrorism, including bombing the U.S. Capitol in 1983, and fake IDs. Then-Judge Merrick Garland found no problem with a magistrate who arbitrarily dropped the charges against her, at the request of Obama’s Justice Department.
In terms of who, what, when, where, why, and how, let's look at the lawyers involved in the classified documents case.
CBS reported that "longtime Democratic lawyer Bob Bauer is serving as the personal attorney for President Biden" in this matter. But here's the rest of the story, as told by CBS: “He served as White House counsel for President Barack Obama and as a top attorney in the 2020 Biden campaign… Bauer is also listed as Obama's representative to the National Archives, the designee for document requests and matters that may arise with the former president's papers."
Bauer served as White House Counsel to President Obama from 2009 to 2011. He also served as general counsel to Obama for America, the president’s campaign organization, in 2008 and 2012.
Former Biden adviser Anita Dunn worked for Obama, too. According to CBS, she was “widely considered inside and outside the West Wing as poised to become the first woman to be White House chief of staff.”
She previously served as acting White House Communications Director in the Obama White House and was a managing director at SKDK, the “leading” Democratic media and political consulting firm.
If Michelle ultimately decides not to run, the beneficiary of the latest Biden scandal will likely be Maryland’s first black governor Wes Moore, a favorite of Oprah Winfrey (just like Barack Obama) whose campaign was engineered by SKDK. Moore ran on a marijuana legalization platform and served as an officer of a marijuana business.
In addition to the illegal aliens, more than 22 million marijuana users, or stoners, constitute a major voting bloc for Obama’s “permanent revolution.”
The Lies of Obama-Biden
By Cliff Kincaid
The lies of Obama-Biden are far more significant than those of one member of Congress, Rep. George Santos, who claimed to be gay and fudged the facts about his background. Obama campaigned under false pretenses as a Christian when he was a Marxist mole in the American political system. Now, Obama-Biden secret documents are being found in a closet and a garage. I suspect Obama’s hand behind Biden’s latest scandal.
For his part, when he ran in 2008, Obama must have figured that since the major media were failing to seriously examine his background, they would be prepared to overlook or at least minimize Joe Biden’s history of plagiarism. It was a good bet. Charges of plagiarism drove Biden from the presidential race in 1988. But they didn’t become a factor in 2008, when Obama picked Biden as his vice-president, or 2020, when Biden ran as president.
Everybody knows that Biden, like Santos, had a tendency to exaggerate or embellish but Biden’s career flourished since those incidents. It’s because he served the interests of the elites devoted to what Biden in a Wall Street Journal called the “New World Order.”
Now, apparently, Biden can be discarded. I suspect Obama is pulling the strings behind the scene. After all, to repeat, “Obama-Biden documents” are being discovered.
In terms of Obama, at the real center of this scandal, we don’t need a special counsel to learn that Barack Hussein Obama campaigned in 2008 as a Christian but was never baptized a Christian in the traditional sense. On the other hand, Biden campaigned as a Catholic who didn’t take Catholic teachings seriously.
Since Republicans seem overwrought at the lies that were told by George Santos, let them use their new-found power in the House to open a full-scale investigation into how Barack Hussein Obama came to power and why he chose Biden has his vice-president. It is never too late to put the facts on the record, especially since Obama is widely perceived to be calling the shots in the JoeBama Administration and may be orchestrating the removal of Biden.
Remember that Attorney General Merrick Garland was originally Obama’s pick for the Supreme Court. He is Obama’s fixer.
In regard to Santos, Democrat House Representatives Dan Goldman and Ritchie Torres filed a complaint with the House Ethics Committee against him. They claim “Santos must be held accountable for defrauding both Congress and the public.”
That’s fascinating. When questions came up during the 2008 campaign about Barack Obama’s religious affiliation, among other matters, his aides flatly asserted that he was a “practicing Christian” and was “baptized” in the Trinity United Church of Christ, led by Jeremiah Wright.
But calling yourself something is not the same thing as proving it is the case.
Unfortunately for Obama and his backers, the same Obama apparatus which claimed that he is a Christian asserted that the mysterious “Frank” in Obama’s book, Dreams from My Father, was just a black civil rights activist. It turned out that “Frank” was Frank Marshall Davis, a Communist Party member under surveillance by the FBI who served as a mentor for a young Obama in Hawaii. The 600-page FBI file on Davis even suggests he was an espionage agent on behalf of the Soviet Union.
As I discovered at the time, it is important to take a look at what Obama’s own books, Dreams from My Father and The Audacity of Hope, say about the President’s religion, or lack thereof.
He acknowledges in Dreams that his grandfather was a Muslim (page 104) and that he spent two years in a Muslim school in Indonesia studying the Koran (page 154). In The Audacity of Hope, he says (page 204) that “my father had been raised a Muslim” but that by the time he met his mother, his father was a “confirmed atheist.”
His stepfather was not particularly religious and his mother professed “secularism,” Obama wrote (pages 204-205), but as a child he went to a “predominantly Muslim school,” after being first sent to a Catholic school. Obama’s reference to being baptized is found in his second book, The Audacity of Hope, published in 2006, not in Dreams, published in 1995. Obama wrote on page 208, “I was finally able to walk down the aisle of Trinity United Church of Christ one day and be baptized.”
Traditionally, Christianity teaches that baptism is a sacrament involving the use of water to signify acceptance of Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. Since Obama was not baptized at the time of his birth, in order to become a Christian he had to enter into the sacrament of baptism at some point later in life.
But Obama does not indicate anywhere in his books that he came into contact with what Christians regard as the “living water.” Instead, he says that, in his baptism, he made “a choice,” knelt beneath a cross, and “felt God’s spirit beckoning.” He said, “I submitted myself to His will, and dedicated myself to discovering His truth.”
This sounds like a powerful experience but it is not what Christians regard as baptism. In fact, there’s no evidence it was a baptism in the traditional sense that it was performed by Wright or anybody else. It looks like Obama walked down the aisle and made a profession of faith. That is not a Christian baptism.
We can clearly see that Obama was leading a secret life as a committed Marxist and was deceiving voters into believing he was a dedicated Christian. These lies make Santos look like a piker.
Frank Chapman, a CPUSA supporter, wrote in the party newspaper that “Obama’s victory was more than a progressive move; it was a dialectical leap ushering in a qualitatively new era of struggle.” He explained, “Marx once compared revolutionary struggle with the work of the mole, who sometimes burrows so far beneath the ground that he leaves no trace of his movement on the surface. This is the old revolutionary ‘mole,’ not only showing his traces on the surface but also breaking through.”
After digesting our book, Permanent Revolution: The Secret Life and Legacy of Barack Hussein Obama, KGB defector Konstantin Preobrazensky said, “I agree with everything and support every single word of it.” He understands that America is suffering through its own communist revolution and that Russia and China intend to come out on top, as America is left in ashes.
That book was the third in our series on Obama and explored the increasing importance of the New Age movement, drugs, and homosexual and transgender ideology. Obama knows what he’s doing. Biden does not. That’s why Biden is expendable.
As House Republicans threaten to investigate this or that, no issue is more important than how Obama seized power under false pretenses and how his operatives continue to run the Democratic Party. This is especially true as billionaires finance a temple to his honor (the “Obama presidential center”) in Chicago.
Come to think of it, perhaps a subpoena should be issued to the Barack Obama Foundation, which oversees construction of the Obama presidential center, demanding any classified documents removed by Joe Biden (or Barack Hussein Obama) during the time Obama-Biden occupied the White House.
Joe Biden and Hunter are just bit players in Obama’s “Permanent revolution.” Republicans should keep their eyes on the prize.
A Republican Church Committee?
By Cliff Kincaid
You are hearing a lot about a “Republican Church Committee” that will uncover “the weaponization of government” against conservatives. We are being promised the “unveiling” of FBI, CIA, and other federal agency abuses. But some of the new popular conservative commentators do not understand the damage done by the Church Committee, and who its chairman, Frank Church, really was.
Equally important, we must understand how the FBI, CIA and other agencies were stripped of their ability to target our enemies and instead were directed to monitor and imprison President Trump and his supporters. That is the key issue.
In my view, these agencies were hollowed out from within by people like Frank Church and turned over to left-wing activists and foreign infiltrators, reaching the zenith of their power under Barack Hussein Obama.
A Senate website offers this analysis of how the original Church Committee came about: “In 1974 Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist Seymour Hersh published a front-page New York Times article claiming that the CIA had been spying on anti-war activists for more than a decade, violating the agency’s charter. Former CIA officials and some lawmakers, including Senators William Proxmire and Stuart Symington, called for a congressional inquiry.”
However, a conservative analysis shows that the purpose of the Church committee was to sabotage the ability of the intelligence agencies to conduct warfare against communist entities at home and abroad. Frank Church, an ultra-liberal Democratic Senator from Idaho, was defeated in 1980 when Republicans came to power under Ronald Reagan.
For an analysis of what was truly happening in the United States at the time, in terms of so-called “anti-war activists,” I recommend the so-called Huston Report, compiled by former Nixon aide Tom Huston. I have posted this hard-to-find declassified report in two sections (part one and part two) at the America’s Survival, Inc. web site. I have also posted a declassified summary of intelligence information concerning the foreign connections of the Weather Underground, whose leaders escaped justice and went on to support Barack Hussein Obama for the presidency in 2008.
One of the great minds working for the American people at the time of the Church Committee was James Angleton, the former chief of counterintelligence at the CIA from 1954-1974 who believed that the CIA itself had been deeply penetrated by Soviet agents.
He reportedly said, “The Church Committee has opened up the CIA to a frontal assault by the KGB. This is the KGB's chance to go for the jugular. The whole plan is being masterminded by Kim Philby in Moscow. The KGB's only object in the world is to destroy me and the agency. The committee is serving as the unwitting instrument of the KGB.”
Kim Philby was a high-ranking member of British intelligence who worked as a double agent before defecting to Soviet Union in 1963. He was recruited by Soviet intelligence on the basis of his devotion to Communism.
James Angleton and Charles J. V. Murphy wrote an article, “On the Separation of Church and State,” which is essential reading. I have posted a copy at the America’s Survival, Inc. web site. They explain the damage done by the Church Committee and quote from the additional views of committee member Senator Barry Goldwater, a staunch anti-communist who puts into context such “abuses” as the CIA role in helping the opposition to the Cuban-backed Marxist Salvador Allende in Chile.
Angleton reportedly asked, “Whose payroll is [Church] on: KGB? GRU [Soviet military intelligence]? Or perhaps the Cubans have recruited him?”
It is also worth noting that Benjamin S. Civiletti, attorney general in the Carter Administration, facilitated the release of four unrepentant Puerto Rican terrorists, the dropping of charges against Weather Underground terrorists, had FBI officials indicted for violating the civil rights of friends and relatives of Weather Underground terrorists, and provided CIA defector Philip Agee with immunity from prosecution.
A Republican Church Committee won’t do its job unless it identifies the communist-Muslim network that spawned the Obama presidency.
Over the years, Soviet/Russian moles in the CIA and FBI have included Aldrich Ames, Harold Nicholson, and Robert Hanssen. We have a right to know if others exist, and if Obama was among them.
In the real Russia-gate scandal, when Democrats utilized Russian disinformation against Trump, the FBI knew not only that Hillary Clinton had used a private unsecured email server but that she had communicated with Obama over that server. What’s more, Obama had used a pseudonym in these communications, to protect his own identity. Who else was he communicating with and why?
The evidence also shows that America’s first Marxist president was briefed on Hillary’s Russia-gate plan by his CIA chief, John Brennan, who voted for the Communist Party in his youth.
To put it bluntly, Russia-gate was an Obama operation, designed to sabotage Trump’s presidency and prevent the purge of the Obama holdovers.
Remember Obama had been caught secretly promising then-Russian President Dmitri Medvedev that he would have more “flexibility” regarding his policies toward Russia after his re-election in 2012. “I will transmit this information to Vladimir,” Medvedev said. Two years later Russia staged its first invasion of Ukraine.
A Marxist student of Russian agent Frank Marshall Davis, Obama met with Chinese Communist President Xi after his two presidential terms to plot the final phase of what the communists call the world revolution. That meeting led to the release of the China virus, the “election” of Joe Biden, and the second Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Unless and until the Republican Church Committee comes to grips with Obama’s service to the Russians and the Chinese, it will stop short of analyzing and understanding America’s current predicament.
Always keep in mind that it was Obama, as president, who had to approve Russia-gate. He also happened to be the president who tried to get Merrick Garland on the Supreme Court. When that failed, Biden made him Attorney General.
We disclosed that Garland, then a federal judge, had approved a cover-up involving the dropping of terrorism charges against communist terrorist Elizabeth Anna Duke, linked to the same Weather Underground terrorists who backed Obama for president in 2008. Obama’s DOJ had requested that those charges be dropped.
Understand what is happening: Obama and his terrorist comrades are being protected while Trump and his supporters are being targeted. Who benefits? The Russians and the Chinese.
Even without a Republican Church Committee, we have the basic outlines -- and many details -- of the plot.
We don’t need a new Church Committee; we need an old-fashioned House Committee on Un-American Activities, whose work including the questioning of Obama’s communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis.
I attempted to put the pieces of the puzzle together in two books, Comrade Obama Unmasked, and Red Star Rising. They tell the story of how Obama came to power and was protected in office by Deep State or communist operatives in the U.S. intelligence community who were then enlisted in a campaign against President Donald J. Trump.
It’s time to issue a subpoena to Barack Hussein Obama and unravel this aspect of what James Angleton had indicated was a communist “monster plot” that goes back decades.
If the House Republicans don’t use their power wisely, we will continue on the road to Obama’s “Permanent Revolution,” the title of our third and final book on the legacy of the Obama presidency.
The Sad State of Conservative Journalism
By Cliff Kincaid
I received an email ad from a “conservative” website promising “Walter Cronkite-style” reporting. The terrible truth is that Walter Cronkite symbolized liberal media bias and used that bias with disastrous consequences for our nation and the world. That media bias today, some of which is on the right side of the political spectrum, aims to depict the Jewish President of Ukraine as a Nazi running a fascist regime. It is a variation of Russian KGB President Vladimir Putin’s communist propaganda.
The spurious reference to Cronkite’s “objectivity” demonstrates that a conservative audience is a special target for those peddling disinformation and propaganda about world events. It is evident in some of the “conservative” media coverage of Ukraine.
But the fact is that new House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, despite his flaws, has voted with the majority of Republicans in favor of aid to Ukraine.
Some “conservatives” are not prepared to recognize the role of former KGB colonel Putin and his comrades in the world today. They think Putin is just a misunderstood Russian nationalist defending Russia against an evil defensive alliance called NATO.
Putin was raised a communist and became a spy for the communist regime in Moscow. He never disavowed communism and in fact lamented the demise of the old USSR. His modern mission is to reassemble it, making him a junior partner of Red Chinese dictator Xi.
In light of this, consider a “conservative” column entitled, “How to Make Republicans and Others Ditch Ukraine.” And if Ukraine is to be ditched, why not Taiwan? Or South Korea?
It made me wonder if the author had wanted the French to ditch the American revolutionaries.
The columnist, Kurt Schlichter, was one of those pundits who had predicted a “Red Wave” and series of Republican victories on November 8. Now he is advocating a “debate” over the destruction of Ukraine and insists he is not a Putin puppet.
Or consider Breitbart writer Kurt Zindulka’s article about French President Emmanuel Macron’s “potentially escalatory move” in supplying old tanks to Ukraine for defense against Putin’s invasion.
Responsible conservatives -- those devoted to Ronald Reagan’s anti-communist philosophy -- should ask these outlets why it is escalation to engage in self-defense. Is it “escalation” to pull a gun on someone burglarizing your own home and murdering your wife and kids?
Almost every day brings more news of Putin’s brutality against the people of Ukraine. And Schlichter, Stephen K. Bannon, and Tucker Carlson want a “debate” over whether they should survive.
The Pentagon release, “Ukraine Troops to Get Bradley Fighting Vehicles,” is long overdue and should change the terms of the debate. JoeBama has been too slow in delivering the weapons Ukraine needs.
Townhall columnist Schlichtaer proclaims, “Sorry, Ukraine and Ukrainians, but America and Americans are more important to me than you.” He apparently doesn’t realize that Ukrainians are fighting their own war, and simply asking for our moral and military support.
As former U.S. Colonel Oliver North has noted, the Red Chinese are watching to see if America supports Ukraine, and what that means for the survival of the Republic of China on Taiwan.
Supporting Ukraine doesn’t mean we have to lose sight of domestic problems. On the contrary, Ukraine’s fight for freedom gives us hope.
Schlichter says he is concerned about other things, such as “Inflation. Crime. Perversions and communist CRT crap.” But the communist crap emanating from the mind of Vladimir Putin has to be addressed as well. He is a hard-core communist whose brutality is apparent for all to see. We addressed his effort to reconstitute the Soviet empire in our 2014 book, Back from the Dead: The Return of the Evil Empire.
Schlichter goes on to say, “Americans change their mind when Washington lies to them. Remember Vietnam? That Democrat war ended when the American people decided to stop it.”
During the 10-year period of the Vietnam War, 1965-1975, more than 58,000 Americans sacrificed and died to save that country from communism.
The truth is that Vietnam would be free today except for a Democratic-controlled Congress. Lewis Fanning’s excellent book, Betrayal in Vietnam, notes that “…it was not the Hanoi communists who won the war, but rather the American Congress that lost it.”
I have written extensively about the Vietnam betrayal and will repeat the lessons, as noted by Fanning. He wrote, “It was not until after the United States elections in the fall of 1974 that North Vietnamese field commanders received the go-ahead in their plans to conquer South Vietnam. As a result of the Watergate scandals, the Democrats had gained forty-three seats in the House. This liberal victory meant that in the 94th Congress there would be 291 Democrats and only 144 Republicans. In the Senate, the Democrats had gained three seats and the lineup was now 61 Democrats to 39 Republicans. This leftward shift of both congressional chambers played a significant role in the North Vietnamese decision to unleash its army.”
Going through the provisions of various bills offered by Democrats in Congress, he presents the case that “A Democratic caucus of the Congress of the United States, aided and abetted by a few liberal Republicans, cast the South Vietnamese people into Communist slavery.”
That left-wing caucus, Members of Congress for Peace through Law, decided that American military involvement would end, and dramatically reduced aid to the government of South Vietnam. Republican President Gerald Ford, who took power after Richard Nixon’s resignation, understood that Congress would not provide enough assistance to keep the country free of communism. Hundreds of thousands of “boat people” tried to escape the Hanoi communists who took power in Saigon while the communist Khmer Rouge took power in neighboring Cambodia, eliminating almost two million people.
The American backing of South Vietnam wasn’t a lie; it was an honorable and noble mission for freedom. We are also backing South Korea for the same reason. It is why we should continue to back Ukraine – and the Republic of China on Taiwan.
So-called “conservatives” who don’t recognize what’s really happening in the world and urge the abandonment of Ukraine are undermining the fight for freedom in the world today.
We should ditch their defeatist no-win attitude.
It’s important for conservatives, especially religious and Catholic conservatives, to understand what we call “The Religious Face of the New World Order.” With the passing of Pope Benedict, and his funeral this week, we need to understand the role of the Roman Catholic Church in world events. It has some of the powers of a government and represents more than one billion people. Despite various scandals, it still is the largest denomination in the United States. However, it depends on foreign immigrants to fill the pews. Hence, it has a major role in the fiasco on the southern border. The church is global in nature and scope.
At one time we published several ground-breaking reports on the church, but they were lost in cyber space when we encountered some major set-backs.
As you may know, my group America’s Survival, Inc. had a television channel with 500 anti-communist videos that was terminated by YouTube. At the same time, a left-wing legal group threatened a lawsuit against us, causing the expenditure of thousands of dollars on a legal defense, and the downsizing of our organization, so that we have one website left, www.usasurvival.org We also lost a major funder, and our direct mail program fell into disrepair when COVID hit, causing delays in the mail and even a failure by print shops to be able to function and print monetary appeals on our behalf. The bottom fell out.
Today, we have one web site and I have been scrambling to re-launch the organization on a sound financial basis. One thing I have been doing is re-assembling some of our old reports, by going back to the archives, and I am happy to say I have reconstituted a report by Lee Penn on “The Religious Face of the New World Order” from 2010, when Benedict was pope. It is eye-opening.
A few “conservatives” are saying Benedict was a defender of the faith. That’s true to a point. But he was also captured by the Vatican bureaucracy, as reflected in his Caritas in Veritate (Charity in Truth) encyclical and proposal for world government. All of this is addressed in the special report I am now offering for a donation to our cause.
My own views are contained in the column, “Pope Benedict’s World Government Disaster,” just released.
In my introduction to Lee Penn’s report, I note the contents of an interview I conducted with Vatican insider Malachi Martin in 1990, in which he said the belief of the Vatican was that both systems, communism and capitalism, would collapse, and that out of the chaos would come the New World Order. The church wants to play a role in this outcome.
A New World Order has also been the announced goal of Joe Biden from the days when he was a Senator. Of course, he is a Catholic, and a Catholic in good standing, according to the bureaucrats in the church.
Interestingly, Malachi Martin would note in his own book, The Jesuits, that it was Cardinal Ratzinger, Prefect of the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, who would issue a refutation of Liberation Theology in 1984. Twenty-five years later, as Pope Benedict, he would preside over the publication by the Vatican newspaper, L'Osservatore Romano, of an October 21, 2009, article by Georg Sans that praised the Marxist theory of alienation under capitalism. Sans teaches the History of Contemporary Philosophy at the Università Gregoriana, the first Jesuit university.
Anyway, this sets the stage for understanding the “world political authority” proposed by Benedict.
Lee Penn wrote, “Caritas in Veritate should be seen as what it is: a theological and political earthquake. The Roman Catholic Church, which was once a guardian of tradition worldwide, now wishes to use radical means (a ‘true world political authority’) for its own ends. It is as if Benedict wishes to mount and ride a wild beast, and imagines that he (and those who believe as he does) will be able to direct that fierce beast’s course. Ordinary prudence – even without reference to the dire symbolism of Revelation 17:3-18 – should have warned the Vatican against such folly.”
The appropriate reference is this: “Then the angel carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness. There I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was covered with blasphemous names and had seven heads and ten horns.”
Our report includes this quotation: “The question is not whether there will be a New World Order. The question is who will control it, and for what ends.”
Pope Francis is serious about making this world political authority a reality.
As we go forward in the new year, I am pleased to present this report and hope you will respond with financial support for our organization. I can truly say there is no other organization with the expertise to understand these unprecedented events in human history. I am gathering more information from like-minded sources.
I hope to soon re-launch our TV channel, where we can broadcast this truth to a large audience.
Our home page includes a “give” feature for donations.
Cliff Kincaid, president
Pope Benedict’s World Government Disaster
By Cliff Kincaid
On January 1, Catholics celebrated the “Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God,” but I find that many Catholics are not aware of the fact that “Our Lady of Fatima,” another name for Mary, is regarded by the church as a miracle appearance that concerned the errors of Russia. The message, delivered in 1917 in Fatima, Portugal, to three children, is not only ominous but relevant to world events. They are even more significant with the passing of Pope Benedict, a proponent of a world government designed to bring “peace” to the world.
Vladimir Putin’s Russia is today spreading death and destruction in Europe, while Putin puppet Daniel Ortega is doing the same in Nicaragua, helping produce hundreds of thousands of refugees at our southern border.
Yet, some leading “conservative” commentators, such as Tucker Carlson and Stephen K. Bannon, ridicule the fight for freedom in Ukraine, while talking endlessly about the invasion of America through the southern border. They seem not to grasp the global dimensions of this conflict.
The evidence shows that Russia is behind much of the turmoil in the world, including the production of refugees fleeing to Western countries.
According to the Fatima vision, the “errors of Russia,” as evident by the Soviet revolution in 1917 and the spread of international communism, could only be stopped by the “consecration” of Russia, a sacred act that was intended to make sure the nation was converted to Christ.
Whether we are talking about Soviet Russia or just Russia, the problem remains the same. However, whether the consecration took place is a matter of some debate among Catholic scholars.
But as anybody can see in Ukraine, which is under constant Russian bombardment, there is no “Christian Russia” today. Nobody can seriously believe that Putin is a Christian statesman, in view of his alliance with China and Iran and refusal to disavow Soviet communism.
By the same token, we have to admit that, under the Biden Administration, so-called “Christian America” is going through the motions of appearing to support Ukraine but has decided upon a policy that provides only defensive weapons of limited value.
JoeBama’s policy seems intended to bleed the people of Ukraine to death, until they capitulate in some way.
It is strange that the Catholic Church pleads for help for Ukraine while failing to educate Catholic parishioners about the solution to the problem – eradication of the remnants of the KGB regime in Russia. Without the conversion of Russia to Christ, this is the only solution. Indeed, regime change must apply to Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and any other country cooperating with our enemies. Ultimately, of course, JoeBama must be replaced.
The no-win policy of the JoeBama regime in Washington, D.C. is not only immoral but costly financially, since it will take hundreds of billions of dollars to rebuild Ukraine and resettle refugees from the conflict. That’s assuming Putin decides to negotiate. Under this outcome, of course, Vladimir Putin and his KGB cronies remain in power in Russia.
Supporters of Ukraine are coming to acknowledge this terrible state of affairs, speculating that the absurd rules of engagement imposed on Ukraine are designed to force “negotiations” and ultimately sacrifice territory to Russia. Such negotiations would presumably occur under the auspices of the United Nations.
Our best military minds understand what’s happening. The former Commanding General of the U.S. Army in Europe, Ben Hodge, comments, “Why do we allow Russia to fire from sanctuary? By not providing ATACMS, F16's and other long-range strikes capabilities to Ukraine, we have in effect granted sanctuary to Russia which is able to kill innocent civilians in Ukraine without fear for consequences.”
That is in fact the case. Our pro-Ukraine policy reduces Ukraine to rubble while Russia is protected from counter-attack.
Since the purpose of Biden’s policy is not to win, another outcome has to be considered. In this context, Biden’s long-standing devotion to a New World Order has to be remembered, along with the fact that Pope Benedict put the Roman Catholic Church firmly on the path to world government.
Once the leader of 1.2 billion Catholics, Benedict endorsed a "World Political Authority," a form of world government, in his 2009 encyclical “Caritas in Veritate.” This world authority, in the Vatican view, is supposed to bring about “timely disarmament” and ensure “food security and peace.”
Keep in mind that it was Benedict who defined this global authority as political in nature. But how many Catholics understand this is the goal of the church they subsidize every Sunday with their donations in the collection plate?
My group America’s Survival published several reports and articles about this “world political authority” at the time Benedict proposed it. But it now takes on more significance in view of the release of the important book, The Devil and Bella Dodd, about the life and revelations of a former high-ranking member of the Communist Party USA.
While ex-communist Whittaker Chambers exposed communist penetration of the U.S. Government, Bella Dodd declared that the Roman Catholic Church was the target of communist infiltration, and she said she recruited more than 1000 communists to be Catholic seminarians. Her mentor, Bishop Fulton Sheen, suggested that the Vatican itself had been penetrated by a communist mole operating in the Jesuit order.
Citing her various statements and interviews, the authors of the Bella Dodd book, Mary Nicholas and Paul Kengor, quote her as saying the goal of the communists is world government. “My dear friends,” she said, “there are four or five different strands working towards world government. One of them is socialism. One of them is communism.” She also declared, “The communist conspiracy consists of men and women who are located in New York, in Moscow, in Paris, in London, in Saigon, in Hong Kong, and throughout the world…. It consists of a group of people who cooperate with each in moving toward a world government…”
For his part, Whittaker Chambers had identified the U.S. Government as being compromised for the purpose of ushering in a world government under communist control. In that regard, we know that Chambers fingered top State Department figure and United Nations co-founder Alger Hiss as a communist spy. Therefore, it is rational to assume that the U.N. was and continues to be an organization under which these sinister forces will gather to force global change on the world.
Indeed, the United Nations has to be considered the headquarters of what Joe Biden had described in a Wall Street Journal column as the New World Order.
Significantly, Benedict was a big booster of the United Nations, whose General Assembly was once head by a Catholic Priest and communist by the name of Miguel D’Escoto. He served as President of the U.N. General Assembly from September 2008 until September 2009 and was suspended from his priestly functions by Pope John Paul II, the anti-communist pope, in 1985.
D’Escoto had been a member of the communist Sandinista regime in Nicaragua and served as foreign minister, after which the Soviets recognized his service by giving him the International Lenin Peace Prize.
As a result of President Ronald Reagan’s anti-communist foreign policy, however, the Sandinistas were eventually thrown out of power through free elections.
In a significant development, D’Escoto, an advocate of Marxist-oriented “liberation theology,” was returned to his duties as a priest in the Roman Catholic Church, after a 29-year suspension, by current Pope Francis, the first Jesuit to hold that position.
D’Escoto wrote a “Dear Brother President Barack Obama” letter, seemingly modeled on Obama’s “fundamental transformation” of America, seeking destruction of global capitalism. In this regard, both President Obama and Pope Francis worked on normalization of relations with Communist Cuba, a dictatorship that is still producing refugees that are arriving at our southern border.
Today, not surprisingly, a significant number of the most recent refugees from Central America come from Nicaragua. A New York Times story acknowledged, “Hundreds of thousands of Nicaraguans have fled their country in recent years, escaping poverty and repression under an increasingly authoritarian government.”
That “authoritarianism” is communism.
If Republicans had any sense, they would emphasize that many of those coming to America to escape communism will unfortunately find it here, under JoeBama. At the same time, they should remind their dissidents in the ranks that opposing aid for Ukraine will not solve the refugee problem. What will solve the refugee problem is taking out regimes that produce refugees for the purpose of destabilizing the West.
History shows that the Sandinistas returned to power in Nicaragua in 2006. Then, in 2014, Vladimir Putin made a “surprise visit” to the Central American country. Sandinista President Ortega said Putin’s visit was “like a ray of light, like a flash of lightning.” That same year, Putin also staged his first invasion of Ukraine.
At first, the Sandinistas fooled many Catholics into supporting them and even had Catholic priests in their government. That was a ruse. Today, according to researcher Martha Patricia Molina Montenegro, the Catholic Church in Nicaragua is being persecuted and repressed. She said 2022 “was the most disastrous year” for the Nicaraguan Catholic Church and that it was the target of “140 attacks from the Sandinista dictatorship.”
Consolidating Russia control of this nation, the Sandinista regime provided troops to take part in a major multinational military exercise, Russia's quadrennial military exercises known as Vostok. Military units from China and Syria, among other countries, also participated. Putin personally attended the exercise.
Benedict’s “world political authority,” which will facilitate a "settlement" to the benefit of our enemies, is a disaster of Biblical proportions in waiting.
If they love their country, Catholics in particular need to understand the message of “Our Lady of Fatma” has relevance today, as America faces a coordinated Russian-Chinese axis of military power that spreads suffering on a global basis and is preparing to deliver a death blow that is described in the Bible as Armageddon.
At the same time, Catholic leaders should speak out regarding how the JoeBama regime is allowing all of this to happen.
December 31, 2022: Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI dies
Note: The Pope is a religious leader of 1.2 billion Catholics, with 63 million of them here in the U.S. It’s precisely because the Catholic Church is the largest religious body in America that the statements of its leader deserve media scrutiny.
Pope Benedict and World Government
From The Devil and Bella Dodd, about communist infiltration of the Roman Catholic Church
Bella addressed the subject of Fabian socialism during her talks around the country after she left communism. For example, at an address in Detroit in 1961, Bella was asked: “Is Fabian socialism a forerunner of communism or is it the same thing under a different name?” Her reply was illuminating:
By Cliff Kincaid
Originally published on July 7, 2009
Some in the media are calling it just a statement about “economic justice.” But Pope Benedict XVI’s “Charity in Truth” statement, also known as an encyclical, is a radical document that puts the Roman Catholic Church firmly on the side of an emerging world government.
In explicit and direct language, the Pope calls for a “true world political authority” to manage the affairs of the world. At the same time, however, the Pope also warns that such an international order could “produce a dangerous universal power of a tyrannical nature” and must be guarded against somehow.
The New York Times got it right this time, noting the Pope’s call for a world political authority amounted to endorsement of a New World Economic Order, a long-time goal of the old Soviet-sponsored international communist movement. Bloomberg.com highlighted the Pope’s call for a new world order with “teeth.”
The Pope’s shocking endorsement of a “World Political Authority,” which has prophetic implications for some Christians who fear that a global dictatorship will take power in the “last days” of man’s reign on earth, comes shortly after the United Nations Conference on the World Financial and Economic Crisis issued a call for global taxes and more powerful global institutions. U.N. General Assembly President, Miguel D’Escoto, a Communist Catholic Priest, gave a speech at the event calling on the nations of the world to revere “Mother Earth” but concluded with words from the Pope blessing the conference participants.
The controversial Papal statement comes just before a meeting of the G-8 nations and a scheduled meeting between the Pope and President Obama at the Vatican on July 10.
Sounding like Obama himself, Pope Benedict says this new international order can be accomplished through “reform of the United Nations Organization, and likewise of economic institutions and international finance, so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth.”
The “teeth” may come in adopting the global environmental agenda, which the Pope warmly embraces.
Sounding like Al Gore, the Pope said that one pressing need is “a worldwide redistribution of energy resources, so that countries lacking those resources can have access to them.” He adds that “This responsibility is a global one, for it is concerned not just with energy but with the whole of creation, which must not be bequeathed to future generations depleted of its resources.”
“The Church has a responsibility towards creation and she must assert this responsibility in the public sphere,” he explains.
In a statement that sounds like an endorsement of a new global warming treaty, which will be negotiated at a U.N. conference in December, the Pope says, “The international community has an urgent duty to find institutional means of regulating the exploitation of non-renewable resources, involving poor countries in the process, in order to plan together for the future.”
“The technologically advanced societies can and must lower their domestic energy consumption, either through an evolution in manufacturing methods or through greater ecological sensitivity among their citizens.” he declares.
In terms of how this new “world political authority” should look, the Pope says that it, too, should have “teeth” in the form of “the authority to ensure compliance with its decisions from all parties, and also with the coordinated measures adopted in various international forums.” Pope Benedict declares that “such an authority would need to be universally recognized and to be vested with the effective power to ensure security for all, regard for justice, and respect for rights.”
But the document, which is more than 30,000 words long, is contradictory in that it pretends that a world government can co-exist with freedom and democracy. For example, the statement calls for “a greater degree of international ordering, marked by subsidiarity, for the management of globalization.” The term “subsidiarity” is usually defined as having matters handled by local authorities, not international bureaucrats.
In another example of double-speak, the Pope declares that “Globalization certainly requires authority, insofar as it poses the problem of a global common good that needs to be pursued. This authority, however, must be organized in a subsidiary and stratified way, if it is not to infringe upon freedom and if it is to yield effective results in practice.”
He doesn’t explain how it will be possible for citizens to influence or control this “world political authority” when they are under its bureaucratic control.
In the statement about how the New World Order could turn into a tyranny, the Pope is also contradictory, declaring that “…the principle of subsidiarity is particularly well-suited to managing globalization and directing it towards authentic human development. In order not to produce a dangerous universal power of a tyrannical nature, the governance of globalization must be marked by subsidiarity, articulated into several layers and involving different levels that can work together.”
Against, he doesn’t explain how people on the local or even national levels will be able to resist this tyranny.
In a strong endorsement of foreign aid, the Pope says that “In the search for solutions to the current economic crisis, development aid for poor countries must be considered a valid means of creating wealth for all.”
But there must be more. He says that “…more economically developed nations should do all they can to allocate larger portions of their gross domestic product to development aid, thus respecting the obligations that the international community has undertaken in this regard.”
This statement seems to be an urgent call for fulfilment of the U.N.’s Millennium Development Goals, which involve an estimated $845 billion from the U.S. over a ten-year period.
The Pope goes on to say that the social order should conform to the moral order, but the fact is that on moral issues such as abortion and homosexuality, the agenda of the United Nations is opposed to that of the Catholic Church. Even on capital punishment, there is disagreement. The U.N. opposes it while traditional church teaching (Section 2267 of the Catholic Catechism) allows it in certain cases.
In his statement, the Pope declares that “Some non-governmental Organizations work actively to spread abortion, at times promoting the practice of sterilization in poor countries, in some cases not even informing the women concerned. Moreover, there is reason to suspect that development aid is sometimes linked to specific health-care policies which de facto involve the imposition of strong birth control measures. Further grounds for concern are laws permitting euthanasia as well as pressure from lobby groups, nationally and internationally, in favour of its juridical recognition.”
What he doesn’t mention is that some of these groups operate through and with the support of the United Nations.