Dear Friends:
If you go to our home page, www.usasurvival.org, you will find the evidence of the would-be assassin’s political motive that FBI Director Christopher Wray can’t seem to find. Crooks made a political donation to ActBlue, which raises money for Biden/Harris by denouncing Trump as a threat to democracy. If this is not a political motive, what is? By the way, CBS has confirmed this is THE Thomas Crooks. CBS confirmed: “In fact, Federal Election Commission records show that the Bethel Park address on the $15 donation, earmarked to Progressive Turnout Project, is the same street address and ZIP code where the gunman lived. But the municipality is mistakenly listed as Pittsburgh, despite Bethel Park being outside Pittsburgh city limits.” What’s more, CBS noted, “Crooks made the donation on Jan. 20, 2021, the same day President Biden was inaugurated.” The latest is that Crooks may have had an account on social media platform Grab to support Joe Biden. Gab CEO Andrew Torba reported this after receiving “an emergency disclosure request from a law enforcement agency.” My new column, The Real Insiders Out to Get Trump, looks at those in the Trump campaign who put Trump’s life in danger. This isn’t just a Secret Service problem. But ultimate responsibility falls on Biden/Harris. My other new column, Blood On Their Hands, examines that. I recommend a kind of “Popemobile” for Trump. On Saturday, July 27, I will be giving a speech in Pennsylvania at the 4th Annual Constitution Picnic on the assassination plot. Click here for details. Help us with our in-depth investigations. Please contribute here. For America’s Survival, Cliff Kincaid
0 Comments
![]() The Real Insiders Out to Get Trump By Cliff Kincaid In assessing whether there was an “inside job” to kill Trump, many have naturally focused on the federal agencies, including the Secret Service and the FBI. But what if Trump was set up by someone inside his campaign? This does not seem far-fetched now that we know that someone in the campaign had been begging the Secret Service for additional security. We now understand that additional security was not forthcoming and Trump was nevertheless sent out to the Butler rally on July 13 and exposed to gunfire from a roof that was not being monitored. Clearly, this was a set-up. The conclusion is inescapable: somebody in the campaign knew there was a risk to Trump’s life because federal agencies were unwilling to protect him. Or perhaps several people knew about the risk. Who are these people? And shouldn’t Trump immediately fire them? These are troubling conclusions to make, but that is where the evidence leads. Looking back at the situation, Rep. Mike Waltz said, “I have very reliable sources telling me there have been repeated requests for stronger secret service protection for President Trump.” Those “reliable sources” must be in the Secret Service and the Trump campaign. They must be in the Trump campaign since Waltz said some of the requests were made in writing. That means that Trump’s people knew of the risk to the president but sent him out to be in front of the crowds anyway. They knew the security was insufficient. But the risk was not just to the president but members of the crowd, as we saw in Butler. So this “security failure,” if that’s what you want to call it, was on both ends – in the Secret Service and in the Trump campaign. This dramatic conclusion puts a new perspective on things. Let us understand the real dimensions of the “inside job” theory. The issue becomes not whether a series of flubs, failures, and breakdowns occurred. And the claims about a second shooter divert attention away from the main issue. The basic problem is why, knowing the security was not good enough, Trump’s advisers decided to proceed with these dangerous rallies and put Trump’s life in danger. And that indicates the Trump campaign has been infiltrated by people willing to risk the life of the former president. Whether it was one shooter or more, Trump’s life was in danger in part because of decisions made by his own campaign! Does Trump trust those around him? Perhaps he should take a second look. After initial denials, the Secret Service admits the Trump campaign was requesting additional security. At the same time, there is no evidence the campaign procured additional security from private sources, as I had been arguing BEFORE the assassination attempt. That means his advisers were content to have Trump appear out in the open before massive crowds without adequate protection. In other words, all the blame doesn’t rest on the Secret Service. And the Trump people who proceeded with the Butler rally knew his life would be in danger as a result. Put another way, the Secret Service is certainly to blame for not providing that extra protection. But the Trump people knew the protection was inadequate. If we think back, consider the fact that the Secret Service had coordinated with the FBI to stage its armed raid on Trump’s home on August 8, 2022. That should have set off alarm bells among Trump’s people about whether the Secret Service could be trusted to protect Trump. The inescapable conclusion is that while there was a federal plot to kill Trump, it was aided and abetted by people in the Trump campaign who knew or had to know the Secret Service could not be trusted to protect the president. My warnings that Trump’s life was in danger were published far and wide. My first warning about the plot, “Marked for Death,” was published on June 12, about one month before the assassination attempt. Three days later I published “The Armed Enemies Within Plot Trump’s Murder,” about the corruption in the Secret Service and other federal agencies. In that article I declared that, “What is clear is that Trump needs to hire professional and private security guards to protect him and his family from the FBI and the Secret Service.” It is clear nothing was done. Then, on June 28, I published an article, “The ‘Conspiracy’ to Kill Trump,” in which I reiterated that “federal intelligence agencies like the FBI and CIA do not want Trump to win and will work to make sure he never returns to the White House.” The point is that nothing was done to beef up security for Trump, even though his people had to know his life was in danger. As such, with federal agencies determined to eliminate him from the race, and Trump’s people refusing to go public about the dangers, the inevitable happened – an assassination attempt was made. What I find interesting is that Trump’s people have moved on, blaming the Secret Service for failures, when they are directly implicated in the plot. These campaign aides were grossly negligent and they should be held accountable. Their negligence almost cost the life of their boss, the former president and current presidential candidate. Instead, to my knowledge, nobody has been fired from the campaign. And nothing has been done to procure private security services. What the Trump campaign also ought to be doing is instituting additional screening and vetting for all Secret Service personnel guarding the president. Trump has always had a problem with loyalty. He still has a problem. His own family members, especially his sons, should immediately halt all of Trump’s personal appearances until additional security is obtained either from trustworthy federal personnel or private security guards judged to be loyal to the former president. I’m sure Eric and Don Jr. want their father to win a decisive victory against the Deep State forces out to get him. They want him to continue to campaign. But if my father were targeted for murder, I would stop his public appearances until I was sure he could be protected. And I would look inside the Trump campaign for problems. They should look to the example of what happened after Pope John Paul II was the target of an assassination plot engineered by the Russian KGB. In major public appearances, current popes tend to use the so-called “Popemobile,” which is surrounded by bullet proof glass and armor. Trump needs something like that. It would dramatically illustrate the state of our political system today, in which the leading opponent of the Deep State shows his determination to survive everything they throw at him. It would also result in more protection for his physical safety, a growing concern for his millions of supporters.
![]() Blood On Their Hands By Cliff Kincaid The article, “It’s Biden’s Fault,” is the best analysis I have seen about the fact that Joe Biden (and Kamala Harris) bear responsibility for the attempted assassination of their political opponent, President Trump. These are basic facts about the chain of command. The Biden-Harris Administration is getting away with nearly assassinating their political opponent. We are now being treated to the next phase of the campaign, with Kamala Harris taking over for Biden, as if it’s politics as usual. An American political party in charge of the federal government laid the groundwork for assassinating President Trump, wants no blame for what happened, and wants the media to move on to something else. On Monday, we were treated to a low-level flunky, Secret Service director Kimberly Cheatle, shoveling out what Rep. Nancy Mace called “bull----” for several hours, in a televised hearing. We were treated to run-of-the-mill news “reports” about her lies and evasions and the endless calls from Republicans and Democrats for her resignation or firing. The Democrats joined with Republicans in calling for her to go because they know this is a sideshow that diverts attention from those in the White House literally “calling the shots.” The assassination attempt followed Biden himself declaring Trump to be in the bullseye. Trump says he asked Cheatle why there was nobody on that roof to prevent the would-be assassin from climbing on the roof and shooting. Trump was told the Secret Service did not have the manpower to cover what would become the shooter’s position, “which is crazy,” he added. Trump must know he was set up to die. Biden, of course, has been AWOL. So that leaves Harris as the one in charge. She has now officially taken charge, with the expectation that the media will move on and now treat the race as new and exciting, as if what happened to Trump is just a footnote. The Democratic Party responds with $81 million in donations, ready for another left-wing zealot or perhaps the Iranians to try to kill Trump. The previously cited article in Chronicles (by an attorney using a pen name) makes the following basic points:
One newsworthy element out of the hearing was that it was demonstrated that Mayorkas and Cheatle lied when they issued statements absolutely denying that the Trump campaign had requested additional security. The lies were brought to light by Rep. Mike Waltz. Cheatle tried to defend her lie by saying she was only referring to the campaign not requesting additional protection for that one rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. But that’s not what Mayorkas and the Secret Service statement, approved by Cheatle, said. They issued blanket denials. Waltz noted that some of the requests for additional protection were made in writing. Even one so-called “fact-checker” website had to admit that “On July 20, the Secret Service acknowledged it had denied some requests by former President Donald Trump's campaign for increased security at his events. This admission is a reversal from statements the agency released immediately following the attempted assassination on Trump.” The “reversal” means they were caught lying. The record is clear: Trump’s blood and the death of the fire chief and the injuries to two other Trump supporters are on the hands of Cheatle, Mayorkas, and Biden/Harris. The fact that one more specific request for additional protection was not made regarding the Butler rally does not make the denials by Mayorkas and Cheatle true, for their denials were broad and general in nature. It only means that the Trump campaign realized at some point that additional protection was not going to be forthcoming and that it was futile to keep asking. The proper response of Mayorkas and Cheatle should have been to immediately admit that previous requests had been denied. They didn’t make this admission because they know this means blood is on their hands – and the hands of their bosses, Biden and Harris. In another exchange, Cheatle admitted that she and Mayorkas had not held a single press conference in the nine days since the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. That means they were trying to get their story together, after their initial lies. At some point, Congress must conclude the obvious – they were setting Trump up for assassination. This was a planned and deliberate attempt to remove him from the presidential race. The Republicans seem unwilling to go where the facts lead them. What we have learned is that the current Administration is prepared to do anything to take Trump out of the race. The author of the Chronicles article notes, “Biden is also responsible for providing the American people with a prompt and accurate explanation of what went wrong. Unless he fires the responsible officials, he is tacitly endorsing what happened in Butler, Pa., and inviting repetition. It’s up to him, not the American public, to restore public faith in the federal government by prying the truth from his subordinate agencies.” (emphasis added). He is right about Biden and Harris: they are tacitly endorsing what happened in Butler, Pa., and inviting repetition. Tacit means understood or implied without being stated. Even with Cheatle out of power, the infrastructure for the attack remains in place. And those are the heavily armed federal agencies. This is not a time for politics as usual. As Americans, we are face to face with a federal tyranny that wants to kill its leading political opponent. Thomas Jefferson said, “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure.” Rep. Nancy Mace, who said “bull----” to Cheatle about her lies, engaged in another enlightening exchange. Here is a partial transcript: Congresswoman Mace: …We had to issue a subpoena to get you to show up today. That is not transparent, by the way. You stated earlier, the Secret Service is not political. Is that correct? Director Cheatle: Yes. Congresswoman Mace: OK. Would you say leaking your opening statement to Punch Bowl News. Politico's playbook, and Washington Post several hours before you sent it to this committee as being political, yes or no. Director Cheatle: I have no idea how my statement got out. Congresswoman Mace: Well, That's bull----. We have plenty of manure in Washington, D.C. Meanwhile, the “Tree of Liberty” Thomas Jefferson quotation has even been put on a MAGA 2024 T-Shirt. Trump supporters must be careful not to play into the hands of those on the other side who want a backlash to the political violence to justify their campaign against Trump. One Biden /Harris supporter has already been picked up for making deaths threats against Trump and his running mate, Senator J.D. Vance. In one threat, this would-be assassin, Michael W. Wiseman, wrote, “Trump and Vance should be murdered before turning us in to West Russia. No time like the present.” In another post, he wrote “I am advocating Trump and Vance’s daughters get raped and THEN tell me they won’t fly their kids out of the USA for an abortion.” So this is yet another let-wing zealot brainwashed by anti-Trump propaganda, who was either motivated to kill or wanted others to do the killing. The Wiseman posts demonstrate that the Russia-gate and pro-abortion propaganda help create those would-be assassins. And we have to assume there are many more like him who are programmed to kill. Since more attempts on his life are planned, Trump needs to campaign in the future behind bulletproof glass and reinforced armor plating. Those features were added to the Popemobile after the 1981 attempt on Pope John Paul II’s life.
source: The third anniversary of martyr Qassem Soleimani
How the Deep State Arranged the Hit on Trump By Cliff Kincaid We know Joe Biden is a cognitive mess. But what about the media? No matter where you turn, we are being treated to endless claims of “security failures” and “oversights” by the Secret Service. We need “transparency,” they constantly say, as the head of the Secret Service runs away from Senate Republicans on the floor of the Republican National Convention. How many lies must be told before they conclude there was a conspiracy to kill Trump? At this point, we must conclude either there was federal participation in the plot or the cover-up. Or both. In any case, the corruption goes far beyond even “catastrophic incompetence.” Federal Assassins We remember Ruby Ridge, where an FBI sniper killed the wife of Randy Weaver. We remember Waco, where the FBI and ATF used tanks to crush a religious community, igniting a fire that consumed the lives of 80 people, including women and children. More recently, in the case of Hunter Biden’s ex-girlfriend, Lunden Roberts, the mother of his 5-year-old daughter, we know she has been begging the Bidens for security protection, describing break-ins to her home in Arkansas and threats to their lives. Nothing was done to protect her, so she is now armed with a shotgun and handguns and guard dogs. If the Bidens won’t protect the mother of Hunter’s child and their own granddaughter, why would they want to keep Trump alive, just so he can beat them in November? The Trump campaign should have taken our advice about getting a private security firm. We saw that what was happening to Lunden Roberts was the template for Trump rallies. “Conspiracy Theories” On Fox News, Bill Hemmer talked about the “wild theories running all over the Internet” about the murder plot against Trump, as if those of us discussing the evidence for an “inside job” were somehow way off base. However, later, on the same channel, Senator Tom Cotton talked about the “conspiracy of silence” that kept the American people from learning the basic facts regarding Biden’s medical condition. Nobody doubts this was indeed a real “conspiracy.” There is no other explanation. Indeed, Fox is now running a program called “The Cognitive Cover-Up.” If there has indeed been a conspiracy of silence to protect Biden, why can’t there be a conspiracy to kill Trump, Biden’s main opponent, and cover it up? Let’s use some common sense. Think about it this way: If keeping Biden in the White House was such a top priority, why isn’t killing his Republican opponent a top priority as well? Former Obama fundraiser Don Peebles was just on Fox, discussing the cognitive cover-up while noting that the Democrats had been trying to vilify and bankrupt Trump and put him in jail. He seems disillusioned with those around Biden. The logical follow-up to the campaign against Trump, if all else fails, is assassination. But thanks to an act of God, in turning Trump’s head around at the last second, the plan failed. So now we have nowhere else to turn but to uncover all the personalities involved in the plot and the cover-up. The Deep State Welcome to the world of the Deep State, those nameless and faceless operatives who are behind several notorious “suicides” and deaths over the years. We don’t know exactly who they are, but we do know they serve the interests of agencies like the FBI, CIA, and NSA. You might say, or assume, that federal officials wouldn’t go that far. But why make that assumption? This cover-up is about maintaining the power of the Democratic Party. What better way to assure Biden’s election, now that his cover as a crippled incumbent is broken, than to kill Trump? They tried everything else. Murdering Trump solves all the Democrats’ problems. It would make replacing Biden unnecessary. The Vincent Foster Case The Democrats have tried murder before, such as in the case of the Clinton White House lawyer, Vincent Foster, whose body was dumped in a public park. He was discovered to have gained access to secret binders of the NSA and was quickly dispatched. Members of the Deep State were utilized to harass and intimidate a witness into silence. AIM founder Reed Irvine and I worked on the case together and I recommend his excellent analysis, “Evidence Proving Vincent Foster Was Murdered.” Lunden Roberts, in the Clinton’s home state of Arkansas, understands this, saying when you challenge the Clintons “you go missing, or something happens to you…That’s what I’ve always heard.” Trump had questioned the “suicide” of Foster in remarks that convinced the Deep State that Trump would dig up too many scandals. Hence, they tied him up legally with Russian disinformation in the Russia-gate hoax and then the communist Chinese released COVID, a dangerous virus but also a cover for Democratic governors in swing states to engage in election shenanigans and ballot box stuffing in 2020. Desperation and the Secret State Those engaged in the cover-up of Biden’s health are clearly desperate people. Is it such a stretch to believe the cover-up has been extended to another and more sinister plot? Just as the Biden medical cover-up fell apart, the conspiracy to cover-up the details about federal involvement in the attempted murder of Trump is coming into public view. If there were no direct federal involvement in the murder plot, why hasn’t the feminist director of the Secret Service been holding open briefings, disclosing what she knew and what her agency did or did not do? In terms of the conspiracy of silence, we usually think of the White House staff and top Democrats, who have a political reason to protect Biden. But surely, if the FBI were really doing its job, it would have known these facts as well. The health of the American president is a national security issue. Director Christopher Wray had to know, as many did who witnessed Biden’s crack-up before the debate, that there was something seriously wrong with the president that presented a national security threat to the nation. Yet, he was silent. He was part of the cover-up. The Trump-hating Assassin Apparently, in the Trump case, the Trump-hating progressive activist and would-be assassin was not employed by any federal agency. We can’t assume anything. Still, we are hearing the FBI say it can’t determine his motive, when his former classmate says he hated Trump and that he contributed financially to a “progressive” political action committee. The FBI lie about his supposed lack of a motive means there is something deeper here. At some point, the cognitively challenged media must exercise some elementary news judgment about what is going on here. How many “lapses” in security must be contemplated before they figure out that the federal agencies in charge of protecting Trump are lying about their own involvement in the plot? I understand people do not want to come to this conclusion, no matter how obvious it is. But the working assumption must be at this point that that federal agencies are implicated in the attempted assassination of the president. All that we must figure out now is how exactly they did it and how big the conspiracy really was. The hearing on Monday in Washington must name the names of the conspirators. The hearing is titled “Oversight of the U.S. Secret Service and the Attempted Assassination of President Donald J. Trump.” However, Secret Service director Kimberly Cheatle is the only witness. What about Christopher Wray? Perhaps the 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks did pull the trigger and he was shot by the Secret Service to shut him up for good. Perhaps some of the Secret Service agents on the ground who protected Trump did not know anything about the plot. But there was a plot of some kind, and that seems clear beyond question. Biden Gave the Order When Biden called for Trump to be in the bullseye, that sent the signal. Whether he knew what he was saying or not, the use of the term “bullseye” was clear and unmistakable. He was told to say this, perhaps by his handlers. The “legal terrorism” wasn’t working They had to destroy Trump in some other way. He had to be killed. From that point on, the anti-Trump activist known as Thomas Matthew Crooks was selected to carry out the murder. There are many of them in America today, programmed to kill by incessant propaganda that Trump is another Hitler and a threat to democracy. Before Crooks was picked, there was Pascale Ferrier, who sent a letter packed with the poison Ricin to Trump. She was picked up before doing any damage, a signal that future assassins must be smarter. It looks like Crooks fit the bill, as he surveilled the Trump rally site in full view of law enforcement, climbed the roof of the nearby building, and then opened fire. The Whistleblowers Unfortunately for the cover-up artists, some Republican members of Congress are getting leaks from inside the federal bureaucracy indicating that the Trump-hating killer had contacts with foreign interests through encrypted accounts. That means the NSA and CIA had to be aware of the possible international dimensions of this conspiracy. Perhaps the Iranians were working with the would-be assassin. Even so, that would mean their interests coincided. In other words, the Iranians, and the U.S. federal agencies, want the same thing – a dead Trump. To understand how this could have happened and is now being covered-up, consider the case of a State Department official by the name of Robert Malley. He was the State Department’s Iran envoy. I am not suggesting he was part of any plot against Trump. But there is something fishy about his “leave” from the State Department, in the context of how the Biden Administration has been conducting relations with Iran. Malley was “a fierce critic of Trump’s Iran policy,” notes the Marxist anti-Israel group Code Pink. His job under Biden was to restart Obama’s 2015 Iranian nuclear deal. Trump’s Iran policy included killing a top Iranian terrorist leader and cutting off funds to the terrorist regime. The late anti-communist author and analyst Herbert Romerstein noted that Robert Malley's father, Simon Malley, was an important figure in the Egyptian Communist Party, was pro-Soviet, passionately anti-Israel, and anti-West. He was booted out of Egypt and later out of France for a while, to be welcomed back later when the more left-wing government of the socialist Francois Mitterrand took over in Paris. Robert Malley had been CEO of the Soros-funded International Crisis Group. Josh Rogin, an excellent foreign policy reporter, noted back on September 6, 2023, that the State Department had suspended Malley’s security clearance “because of an investigation into a possible mishandling of classified information.” He added that the FBI was also “investigating this matter.” The Biden Administration lied, claiming Malley was on leave because he was dealing with a family medical issue. Just another cover-up, standard with this administration. The FBI Stays Silent “Congress and the American people deserve to know more about what’s going on with the State Department’s Iran envoy Robert Malley,” Rogin said. Of course, nothing has been forthcoming and Malley became a Senior Fellow at the Yale University Jackson School. That means the FBI moved on, gave Malley a clean bill of health, and decided to ignore the security questions about this top Biden/Obama official. This is another reason why Christopher Wray must be held responsible for “security failures” in the Trump murder conspiracy plot. I cite the Malley case as another indication that investigations by the FBI cannot be trusted. So why should we trust them in the Trump case when the Democratic Party has been working with Iran against Trump’s policy? If there is an Iranian connection to the attempt on Trump’s life, it will be covered-up, too. Or, perhaps, the Iranians will be blamed, so that the FBI and the Secret Service can escape more scrutiny. If you think this is a stretch, consider the Jeffrey Epstein cover-up. Another Federal Cover-Up Noting that Epstein, the leader of an international child sex trafficking ring, had “escaped justice” from the Justice Department, then-Senator Ben Sasse drew attention to the fact that the guards on duty during Jeffrey Epstein's “suicide” reached a plea deal of 100 hours of community service. They got no jail time under the deal with the feds. We may never find out how he died and whether the tapes he made of sexual encounters involving the rich and famous are in the possession of the Russians and the Chinese. But we must assume it was murder. In the final analysis, one doesn’t have to be a genius to figure out that treason and blackmail are rampant in the U.S. Government, and that our major federal agencies are covering up the extent of the problem and in fact involved in it. That includes the attempted murder of President Trump. Think about the FBI agent and Russian spy Robert Hanssen, inside the bureau for 21 years. The trail of culpability in the Trump assassination attempt leads to the Biden White House and the agencies and people propping him up. Questioning Kimberly Cheatle of the Secret Service is not enough. Bring in Christopher Wray. In this case, as we saw in the Hunter Biden laptop coverup, there are honest people in the bureaucracy, such as those IRS whistleblowers. We must hear from the insiders, not the paid stooges running the Secret Service and the FBI. As for the Trump campaign, bring in a private security service as soon as possible to protect him. Before they try something else.
![]() EVIDENCE PROVING FOSTER WAS MURDERED AIM Report July 20 will be the eighth anniversary of the death of Deputy White House Counsel Vincent W. Foster, Jr. This is an appropriate time to make another effort to get the establishment media to examine the overwhelming evidence that proves Foster was murdered. This report was written for that reason. The cover-up is so transparent to those familiar with the facts that it is maddening to see those responsible make America look like a nation of dolts. Not that we haven't tried to make the truth known, but the brilliant men and women who decide what's fit to print and to air in the traditional media need to have their closed minds pried open. This was written with them in mind. Of the 12 or 13 persons known to have been at the Fort Marcy parking lot between 4:25 and 6:00 p.m. on July 20, 1993 only five have told why they were there and what they saw. The behavior of those who haven't done so indicates that some of them were involved with Foster's death. Four of the five who talked, have provided evidence proving that Foster did not drive his car to Ft. Marcy and kill himself. They are Patrick Knowlton, Mark Feist, Judy Doody and Jeanne Slade. Statement of Patrick Knowlton Patrick Knowlton, who had pulled into the Fort Marcy parking lot shortly before 4:30 to relieve himself saw two parked cars. One was a rust-brown, mid-eighties Honda Accord with Arkansas tags. The other was a later-model metallic-blue Japanese sedan backed into a space about three spaces to the right. Knowlton parked between them. A Hispanic-looking man in the driver's seat of the blue car glared at Knowlton, making him nervous. When Knowlton got out of his car, this man got out of his and watched to see where Knowlton was going. Fearfully returning to his car, Knowlton peered through the windows of the brown car to see if he was in danger of being mugged. He wasn't. The man was back in his own car, still staring at Knowlton, who quickly got in his car and left. He noted that the time was just 4:30. He was there no more than five minutes. On learning that Foster's body had been found in the park, Knowlton called the Park Police and told them what he had seen. They wrote up a brief report based on his phone call. When interviewed by FBI agents on April 14, 1994, he described the mid-eighties brown Honda and the suspicious behavior of the man in the blue car. Describing him in detail, he said he could pick him out of a line-up. The FBI interview report (302) said he had described the brown car as a 1988 to1990 Honda and that he would not be able to identify the man in the blue car. On May 11, they re-interviewed Knowlton, trying to get him to say that he had seen Foster's car by telling him that others had described Foster's Honda as gray/brown or brown. When asked to select the Honda color panel closest to the color of the car he had seen, he chose a rust-brown color that had been used only on 1983-84 models. That proved his claim that the car he had seen was an older model as well as a different color than Foster's. The FBI 302 said Knowlton "believes" the car he saw looked older than Foster's, that it "was shorter in length or more compact" than the photos of Foster's car and that the finish was flat, not glossy. They did not report that his color panel choice had identified it as a 1983-84 model. When Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, the Washington correspondent of the London Sunday Telegraph, located Knowlton and showed him the FBI reports of his interviews, he was very upset by their misrepresentations of what he told them. The Telegraph had an artist draw a sketch of the man in the blue car from Knowlton's description. It was published in London, but neither the press nor the FBI made an effort to get it published or distributed in the Washington metropolitan area. However, the Telegraph's stories resulted in Knowlton being summoned to testify before the grand jury convened by Kenneth Starr to investigate Foster's death. As soon as he got the secret subpoena, Knowlton was subjected to intimidating harassment. He believes the FBI was trying to get him to alter his story. This only steeled his determination to get the truth to the public. He sued the FBI and he and his attorney, John H. Clarke, prepared a devastating critique of the Fiske and Starr investigations and of those portions of Starr's report that he was allowed to see. The three-judge panel that appointed Starr ordered it appended to every copy of the report. He and Clarke and their researcher/investigator Hugh Turley have published a 510-page book, Failure of the Public Trust, using official Foster case documents to expose the cover-up by the FBI and the OIC. (Go to www.fbicover-up.com.) His story has yet to be reported by any major American newspaper. Statements of Judy Doody and Mark Feist This couple drove into the parking lot at about 5:15 and parked at the northeast end of the parking lot. In separate interviews by the FBI they both said they saw a small, brownish older-model Japanese car parked in one of the spaces near the entrance at the south end of the lot. Judy Doody said she saw a man, who may have been shirtless, sitting in the driver's seat. Mark Feist saw a tall, long-haired, bearded man standing beside the car with the hood up. Doody and Feist sat in her car for about 15 minutes before going into the woods. The brown car and the two men were still there at that time. The only other car they saw was a white van that parked between them and the brown car. Doody said the driver got out and emptied some trash. While in the woods they saw an older man wearing red shorts jogging south, away from the parking lot. They were still in the woods when the rescue workers and police arrived. They were discovered by the rescue workers who went south looking for the body while Kevin Fornshill, a Park Police officer, and other rescue workers went north and found it. The Park Police report of their interview of this couple was very brief and very misleading. It said they had seen a small car in which a man without a shirt was sitting that left shortly after they arrived and that they saw a white car pull in and park beside "the deceased vehicle." Doody and Feist were escorted to the parking lot where they were questioned by Park Police officers. Standing in the parking lot where a car with license tags showing that it was registered as a 1989 Honda Accord belonging to Vincent Foster was then parked, they said that at 5:30 an older, small, brown Honda occupied that space. No handwritten notes of the interview have been released. They no doubt showed that Doody and Feist had said they had not seen Foster's car an hour earlier. The officers who conducted the interview may not have realized the importance of this evidence. It was proof that Foster did not drive to Ft. Marcy and kill himself. Two days later, when Patrick Knowlton called to tell them what he had seen, they showed no interest in finding out if his description agreed with that of Doody and Feist. Instead, they typed a report that said Doody and Feist had seen the brown car leave and that "the last car they had observed was a light colored older model car that pulled in next to the deceased vehicle." Doody and Feist told the FBI that was not true. The police had made up that story to account for Foster's car, "the deceased vehicle," being in the parking lot. They told the FBI that the only vehicles they had seen in the parking lot were the brown car and the white van. The FBI did not try to pressure them, as they did Knowlton, to change their story, probably because they thought it futile to try to suggest that they were wrong about what they had seen only an hour earlier. Statements of Jeanne Slade and Dale Kyle Jeanne Slade, experiencing car trouble on the parkway as she approached Fort Marcy Park, turned onto the road leading to the Fort Marcy parking lot. Parking her Mercedes behind a white car on the entrance ramp, she began walking to the park, hoping to find a phone. The driver of the white car, who appeared to be looking at papers or a map, started his car when she passed him and offered her a ride. After she declined his offer twice, he drove up to the lot, turned around and came back down the road. Reaching the parking lot entrance, she saw there was no phone there, but she noticed two cars parked close together, one light gray and one dark blue. She didn't go far enough to see Doody's car at the far end, or any other cars. She returned to the parkway and walked toward the next exit, where there was a gas station. On the way, she saw several emergency vehicles with sirens sounding heading for Ft. Marcy. They arrived there at 6:10 p.m., which indicates that she was there at about 6 o'clock. She was the first person to report having seen a light gray car parked where Foster's light gray Honda was found by the police and rescue workers. Dale Kyle, the man who belatedly claimed to have found Foster's body, arrived soon after Doody and Feist went into the woods. He left shortly before Jeanne Slade appeared. He told the FBI he had seen a compact Japanese car parked at the north end of the parking lot, and he thought it was possibly light blue or tan. He said his recollection was "sketchy" and when shown a photo of Foster's car, he could not say that it was the car he had seen. He had parked at the other end of the lot and had entered the park from there. Returning after finding Foster's body, he mistakenly assumed that Doody's car belonged to the dead man, creating some confusion about its description. There was an unusual amount of activity in the parking lot just before and after Slade made her brief appearance. There was the driver who offered Slade a ride. He has never come forward to tell why he was there and what he had seen. He could have been a confused tourist or he could have been stationed there to warn those in the parking lot of any cars headed their way. Foster's car had apparently just taken the place of the brown Honda, and there were things, like Foster's jacket and tie, that had to be transferred to it. The blue car parked near it was evidently there to extract the driver who delivered Foster's car. The drivers of those two cars remain unknown. The brown car was still in the lot, as the statements below by Todd Hall and Jennifer Wacha show. The blue car got away before the rescue workers arrived, but the two men with the brown car apparently were delayed by an assignment, perhaps the placement in Foster's hand of a gun that may have been delivered along with Foster's car. Kyle has insisted that there was no gun in either hand when he saw the body only minutes earlier. Statements of Hall and Wacha Paramedic Todd Hall and firefighter Jennifer Wacha, who arrived in the parking lot at 6:10, reported seeing a brown car, not in a parking space, with its engine running but no driver. This had to be the brown car that Knowlton, Doody and Feist had seen with a man sitting in it and another standing alongside it. Apparently its occupants heard the fire engine coming and hastily hid. After all the rescue workers rushed off to find the body, the driver and his partner emerged from hiding and made their escape. They were not the least bit curious about why the rescue workers were there. They already knew. Needless to say, the authorities have never heard from them, and they made no effort to find them. Kenneth Starr absolved them and all the others of any involvement in Foster's death. Summing Up The brown Honda in their custody had been a stand-in for Foster's gray Honda for at least an hour and a half. If they had been caught or if Foster's car had arrived just 10 minutes later, it would have been obvious to all that Foster was murdered. The evidence cited here proves that his car did not reach Ft. Marcy until at least two hours after his death. Of all the people who were in the parking lot after 4:25 p.m., three have said Foster's car was not there. Not one has come forward to say that it was. There is not an iota of evidence to support the belief that Foster drove his car to Ft. Marcy. The only basis for the claim made in the Park Police, Fiske and Starr reports that Knowlton, Doody and Feist all saw Foster's car is the theory that Foster committed suicide. Starr claims that all the forensic, testimonial, circumstantial and state-of-mind evidence proves that none of the people at Fort Marcy were connected with Foster's death. The testimonial evidence proves just the reverse. And so does the forensic evidence as is shown below. The state-of-mind evidence was discussed in depth in AIM Report 2001 No. 12 II. The Gun In His Hand Wasn't Foster's Foster had two handguns in his home in Georgetown, a .45 semiautomatic and a .38 modern silver revolver that he inherited from his father. His wife had packed and brought it to Washington in June 1993. When the Park Police asked her if she could identify the 1913 black revolver found in Foster's hand, that was made up of parts of two different guns, she told them that it was not the gun she thought it was, "a silver six-gun with a large barrel." She had never seen the old black revolver before and neither had any of the three children. The Park Police and the Fiske report gave the impression that Foster's sister, Sharon Bowman, had identified the gun as one Foster inherited from his father. An FBI 302 dated April 11, 1995 reveals that she "never positively identified the gun," having said only that it was similar to one she recalled her father owning. She said her father owned only one revolver. Her son, L. Foster Bowman, who had fired his grandfather's handguns, told the FBI it was the wrong color. He told AIM that his grandfather's revolver was a modern, "store-bought" silver gun and that he would not have owned the old black revolver that has been called a piece of junk. Dr. Henry Lee, Starr's consultant, said it had rust spots and a broken grip. Unable to get anyone in the family to say that the old black gun belonged to Foster, the FBI agents worked on his widow, Lisa. They finally succeeded in getting her to say that the black gun was the silver gun she had brought from Little Rock, although she recalled the barrel being "lighter in color." That was good enough for the Starr report, which was artfully crafted to conceal from readers who did not study the footnotes carefully the fact that the gun found in Foster's hand was black. It does mention that the gun she brought to Washington was silver. III. He Was Not Shot With the Old .38 Dr. Donald Haut, the Fairfax County medical examiner who examined Foster's body at Fort Marcy Park, commented that he had seen more damage done by a .25 caliber bullet than what he saw in this case. He said there was very little blood, as did the paramedics and rescue workers. Park Police Sgt. John Rolla, who probed the back of Foster's head looking for an exit wound, could find only a soft spot. He reported that the bullet had not exited from the skull. That is in a report the FBI's Washington field office submitted to FBI headquarters. Those who wrote and read that report must have questioned the possibility of a .38 high velocity bullet fired into Foster's mouth failing to create an exit wound, but nothing in the records released so far show that this claim was questioned by the FBI. Dr. James C. Beyer, the medical examiner for Northern Virginia, solved that problem by finding an exit wound that no one else who had examined Foster's head had noticed. Beyer described it as a hole 1-1/4 inches long and an inch wide in the back of Foster's skull, three inches below the crown. But no one has reported seeing it except Dr. Beyer. If it were there, Sgt. Rolla could have poked two fingers into it, unless he has very fat fingers. Dr. Haut couldn't see it. His death report described the wound as "mouth-to-neck." Dr. Julian Orenstein who examined Foster's head when his body was brought to the Fairfax County Hospital on its way to the morgue, said that he could see no wound, only hair matted with blood. A torrent of blood and tissue, as well as bone fragments, should have burst through a hole that large, but no blood could be seen on the vegetation around Foster's body, there was some on the ground under his head that was visible only when the body was rolled over. No bone or tissue could be found at the crime scene. There is another very serious problem with the exit wound that Dr. Beyer claims to have found. He said in his autopsy report that the entrance wound was in the posterior oropharynx (the rear wall of the throat), 7-1/2 inches below the top of the head. But he claimed there was an exit wound in the skull only three inches below the top of the head. None of the medical examiners who have commented on Beyer's autopsy report has given a plausible explanation of how a high-velocity .38 bullet entering at the back of the throat could exit through the skull 4-1/2 inches above where it entered. This was of concern to the pathologists hired by special prose-cutor Fiske as his consultants. On March 31, 1994, two of them, Dr. James C. Luke and Dr. C.J. Stahl, together with the chief medical examiner of Virginia, Dr. Marcella Fierro (Dr. Beyer's boss), Robert Fiske's deputy, Roderick Lankler, and others met with Dr. Beyer to discuss his autopsy report. What came out of this meeting was a revised autopsy report that changed the location of the entrance wound. They moved it from the posterior oropharynx 7-1/2 inches below the top of the head, to the midline of the soft palate "directly beyond the junction with the hard palate." They left the distance from the top of the head at 7-1/2 inches, but calculations by Hugh Sprunt, a careful student of the evidence in the Foster case, indicate that this distance should have been reduced by about one inch. This relocation was not based on any physical evidence available to those who made it. Dr. Beyer had removed the soft palate and sliced it up for microscopic slides. He had determined that the entrance wound was in the rear of the throat because of the large amount of gunshot residue that he observed there. In his autopsy report he added, "...there is also a defect in the tissues of the soft palate and some of these tissues contain probable powder debris." This shows not only that he distinguished between the soft palate and the posterior oropharynx, but that he had also decided that the defect in the soft palate was not an entrance wound. It appears he made that decision because the palate did not exhibit the quantity of gunshot residue that would be deposited by a gun fired with its muzzle close to or in contact with it. The revised autopsy report altered the description of the soft palate to "Abundant gunpowder residue with contusion hemorrhage." The only physical evidence available to the revisionists was Beyer's microscopic slides of the soft palate tissue. The decision to change the location had to be based on the need to place the entrance wound where it would line up with Beyer's exit wound in the back of the skull. That meant the bullet had to pass through the soft palate. It was not possible for them to resolve this problem by checking the head x-rays. IV. Missing X-rays Expose the Cover-up X-rays should have top priority in cases where a head wound is involved. Dr. Beyer checked "Yes" for "x-rays made" on the autopsy report. He told Park Police officer James Morrisette, who attended the autopsy, that the x-rays showed no bullet fragments in the skull. But he later told the FBI that there were no x-rays. He said he checked "Yes" because he intended to take them, but the machine malfunctioned. He said he didn't learn that until the autopsy was finished. Testifying before a Senate committee on July 29, 1994, he said he did not recall telling officer Morrisette that the x-rays showed no bullet fragments. Asked when the machine was repaired he said, "I have no x-rays in my files between July 6 and 26. After July 26, we were getting x-rays." This was a deliberately deceptive response. The machine was newly installed in June. Foster's autopsy was on July 21, and the service records obtained by Starr's office (the OIC) show that the first call for service on the machine was made on October 29. We obtained copies of those records from the OIC. Beyer's story about why there were no x-rays was false, and those records show that Starr and his staff knew it. Nothing in the record indicates that they pressured Beyer to tell what he did with the x-rays or what they showed that caused him to lie. Paramedic Richard Arthur, who had far more experience with gunshot wounds than the Park Police officers, reported seeing a small caliber entrance wound on the right side of Foster's neck, under the jaw line. Aimed upward, a .22 fired there would go through the tongue and soft palate into the brain, killing without creating a messy exit wound. It is often used by professional hit men. An enhanced crime scene photo, which the OIC refuses to release, is said by some who have seen it to show trauma where Richard Arthur said there was a wound. This would account for the "defect" Beyer found in the soft palate. He didn't call it an entrance wound, because he didn't find an abundance of gunshot debris in that wound. As Sgt. Rolla reported, there was no exit wound in the skull. The x-rays probably showed that the bullet that killed Foster was a .22 caliber trapped inside the skull, certainly not a .38 fired by the revolver found in his hand. That is why the x-rays vanished. The fact that Starr's FBI agents didn't threaten Beyer with perjury and obstruction of justice charges to get him to tell the truth about the x-rays indicates that their goal was to confirm the suicide finding, not expose its falsity. Starr's staff didn't even inform Dr. Brian Blackbourne, the medical examiner Starr hired as a consultant, that they had proof that Beyer had lied about the x-rays not being made. The four pathologists hired by Starr's predecessor, Robert Fiske, probably were unaware of this as well. A small caliber bullet fired into the back of the throat 7-1/2 inches below the top of Foster's head would exit from the neck, below the base of the skull and above Foster's hairline. That would explain the blood-matted hair and the blood on the back of Foster's shirt. A close friend of Foster's, Joe Purvis, told Joe Goulden, who was on AIM's staff at the time, that the mortician in Little Rock showed him a hole the size of a dime in the back of Foster's neck above the hair line. Purvis later denied this, but the telephone interview in which he said it was recorded. Beyer's report of an entrance wound in the back of the throat explains and confirms this exit wound. Reporting that Foster was shot twice, first neck to head and second mouth to neck, would have proved that he was murdered. Beyer's solution was to say a nonexistent exit wound in the skull was made by a bullet fired into the back of Foster's throat. Uncomfortable with that, the pathologists who met with Beyer on March 31, 1994 saved the suicide theory by converting the "defect" in the soft palate caused by the shot under the right jaw into an entrance wound. They eliminated the wounds in the back of the throat and neck. Apparently unaware of this history, Starr's team reverted to Beyer's original theory, and they have gotten away with it. ![]() The Plot to Kill Trump Goes to the Top By Cliff Kincaid John Roberts of Fox News appears to be getting sick and tired of Secret Service stonewalling on the matter of its multiple “security failures” in the attempted assassination of President Trump. On Wednesday, he noted that the federal agency has not held a public briefing on what happened and he said the response is “approaching the level of scandal.” Really? Wow. It apparently comes as a shock to people that the federal government can try to kill somebody, in this case former President Trump, and then cover it up. It’s impossible for some people to believe the corruption runs that deep. Many don’t want to believe the federal government carries out assassinations, certainly not of a political opponent. That’s supposed to happen in places like Russia. An old friend of mine, Fred Gielow, who I met while working with Reed Irvine at Accuracy in Media, has been around a long time. He runs a very interesting website called You Don’t Say on what you can’t discuss in America today. Here are his thoughts: “One thing I haven't seen discussed but deserves discussion is what the sharp shooters were doing. As I understand it, there were three or four of them on the roofs of buildings behind and on both sides of where Trump spoke. Their job was to look for any disturbing developments in the crowd and take action when necessary. You can't convince me they didn't see the shooter climb on the roof and prepare to shoot Trump. There were three or four sharp shooters with nothing to do but look for trouble! And they didn't see the shooter? “Also, from reports, I understand they took out the shooter very quickly after he shot at Trump. The question arises: did they have their sights on the shooter before he even pulled the trigger? Were they waiting for him to pull the trigger? “All these factors lead me to think the assassination attempt was orchestrated by the FBI, Secret Service, and/or other U.S. agencies. Nothing else makes any sense. But this conclusion is very frightening!” He's right. It’s so frightening people don’t even want to entertain the thought. The Washington Post, a paper known for its ties to the intelligence agencies, has published a piece offering more excuses for the Secret Service. The headline says, “Obstructed view may have delayed sniper response at Trump rally.” We are told that the paper conducted a 3D analysis that “found two countersniper teams likely had difficulty seeing the gunman before he fired.” The Post is supposed to operate by the slogan, “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” Anybody who has been paying the least bit of attention knows this is bunk. It was the job of the Secret Service to monitor the area and prevent a shooter from getting in that position, only 130 yards away from President Trump. This lame bit of “analysis” demonstrates that the “security failures” are beyond a scandal and have reached the level of cover-up. Read this paragraph: “A Washington Post analysis, based on more than 40 videos and photos, as well as satellite imagery and terrain analysis used to build a 3D model examining the rally site and shooter’s position, found that the two Secret Service countersniper teams may have initially been hindered in their ability to see the shooter as he crawled up the roof due to its slanted sides. Trees near the rally likely played a part in obscuring the shooter from at least one team assigned to detect and neutralize would-be snipers.” The obvious flaw in this “analysis” is that Trump supporters saw the gunman get in place to shoot. Having a Secret Service agent on the roof would have caught him. The so-called “reporters” behind thus rubbish deserve to be named. They are Samuel Oakford, Aaron Steckelberg, Evan Hill, Jarrett Ley, Jonathan Baran, Alex Horton, and Samuel Granados. Seven different “reporters” were assigned to take the blame away from the Secret Service snipers. The Post admits, “The Secret Service is responsible for the overall coordination of security measures during an event.” Then it goes on to report that “The agency’s director said it tasked local law enforcement with securing the building from which [would be assassin] Crooks allegedly opened fire and that officers failed to prevent him from accessing the roof.” That’s another excuse, another “security failure.” The feminist running the Secret Service also says they didn’t have an agent on the roof of the building because the roof wasn’t flat and was “sloped.” This is absurd. This is worse than a scandal. The excuses demonstrate that something more sinister occurred here. Firing the DEI hire in charge of the Secret Service doesn’t get rid of the root of the problem – a Deep State that has an enforcement arm which carries out what the Russians call “wet work.” Let’s face facts. Our federal government is a tyranny with corrupt agencies, some of them supposedly “protecting” Trump and now investigating themselves. What a joke, except it’s not funny. We are told there was a briefing for some members of Congress today. We will be treated to “leaks” about what was said. Trump’s life is still in mortal danger. Prior to the murder attempt, we had urged the Trump campaign to hire a private security firm because we didn’t trust Biden’s Secret Service to protect our former president. Sadly, we were proven to be correct. I just gave an interview to Delmer Eldred of the Klickitat Voice radio station in Washington State on what we know about the planned assassination of former President Trump, looking at the nature of the “enforcement arm” of the Deep State behind other deaths and “suicides” going back to the Vincent Foster and other cases. Click here to listen. The orders were given by Biden himself, an old sick man, when he called for Trump days before to be put in the bullseye. The people behind Biden who are “calling the shots” know that everything they have tried so far, from bankrupting to arresting him to raiding his home, haven’t worked. On NBC, Biden defended himself, saying he didn’t use the word “crosshairs.” He doesn’t even remember what he said. He once again raised the lie about Trump threatening a “bloodbath,” when the former president was talking about the Chinese importing cars into the U.S. from Mexico and devastating the auto industry. He was talking about an economic bloodbath. Biden, Fred Gielow maintains, is the “Lyin King.” Watch his video highlighting Biden’s history of lies. But the lies continue. Now we learn that Rep. Adam Schiff is in the news demanding Biden exit the presidential race. We are led to believe it’s because of Biden’s age and senility. Schiff seems to understand that Biden, with his “bullseye” comments, is implicated in the assassination attempt.
` ![]() The Next Assassination Attempt By Cliff Kincaid How could this have happened? Federal agencies allowed it. Democrats encouraged it. The federal government is implicated in this attempted assassination. We have a federal government that allowed the leader of the opposition, former President Donald J. Trump, to be targeted for murder. He escaped death through divine intervention. Another video shows Trump supporters desperately trying to alert law enforcement authorities to a shooter on a roof. The gunman can be seen getting in a position to shoot. Nothing was done. Since Trump is supposed to be Hitler, according to the Democrats, this won’t be the last assassination attempt. Hitler was targeted dozens of times. The most famous attempt was publicized in the movie “Valkyrie,” in which a bomb failed to kill the dictator. That was a classic “inside job” assassination attempt. In the Trump case, the would-be assassin reportedly also had access to bomb making materials. But was this also an “inside job” operation? Equally important, who was behind this? Who made it possible? Once again, federal agencies like the Secret Service and FBI are under scrutiny. In my June 12 column, “Trump is a Marked Man,” I noted, “While some commentators are focused on whether Joe Biden can make it all the way to November’s elections because of his senility and old age, the real question is whether the communists and globalists decide the time is right to take out Trump by any means necessary.” Strange movements by the Secret Service in advance of the assassination attempt have already been posted. The video seems to show Secret Service agents clearing the rows behind Trump’s stage shortly before the shooting. Other observers note that the Secret Service agents seemed to be holding Trump upright while at least one is bent over to avoid being shot. It’s true that Trump stood up and raised his fist, in a sign of strength. But observers note that some of the agents were short women not equipped to protect a former president of Trump’s height. This has raised the possibility of DEI hiring practices under Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle. Talking heads applaud the Secret Service sniper for killing the gunman. How convenient. Now he can’t talk. And that was AFTER Trump was supposed to be dead. Constant talk about another “intelligence failure” doesn’t make any sense to America. We don’t believe these excuses. There have been too many intelligence failures over the course of decades. If government is this incompetent, these agencies should have been abolished years ago. And that includes the Secret Service, the FBI, the ATF, and the CIA. True Facts and “Conspiracies.” Talking heads should not automatically reject “conspiracy theories.” Conspiracies happen and they can involve federal agencies either involved in the murder and mayhem or the cover-up that follows. Anybody can Google “Waco” and “Ruby Ridge.” We know the Secret Service, supposedly in charge of protecting Trump, coordinated with the FBI in the armed raid on Trump’s Florida home. That case has now been thrown out because the Special Counsel, Jack Smith, a former United Nations prosecutor, was illegally appointed. We know that the assassination attempt followed by just a few days Biden’s talk with his big donors that he would put Trump in the bullseye. We are told by Biden apologists this was just a “metaphor.” As recently as May, Biden accused Trump of using “Hitler’s language.” This has been a systematic theme of the Democrats. Rep. Mike Collins says “The Republican District Attorney in Butler County, PA, should immediately file charges against Joseph R. Biden for inciting an assassination.” His name is Richard Goldinger. His phone is 724-284-5222. My Special 8-page ASI Report, Marked for Death - The Plots Against Trump, looked at possible culprits and previous attempts on Trump’s life. I wrote that “the Biden-Harris campaign is denouncing Trump as a threat to democracy and would-be-dictator who will prosecute them for their crimes. They are desperate. But their desperation is designed to motivate anti-Trump zealots and fanatics. It is a charge that will energize would-be assassins, such as those discussed in this report." My report added, “By portraying Trump as a Hitler-like threat to democracy, they are creating an atmosphere in which assassination plots can be carried out for the benefit of the Deep State and another Trump enemy, the United Nations, under the control of China, Russia, and Iran.” We Saw This Coming In a column about the corruption in the Secret Service, The Armed Enemies Within Plot Trump’s Murder, I wrote, “The handwriting is on the wall – Trump’s life is in danger because the federal agency in charge of protecting him has been seriously compromised and perhaps even infiltrated.” I have long been advocating for Trump to hire a professional and private security firm to guard him. The Secret Service is lying about its role. The Secret Service's chief of communications, Anthony Guglielmi, posted on X that it was “an untrue assertion that a member of the former President's team requested additional security resources & that those were rebuffed. This is absolutely false.” But Michael Shellenberg reports that “multiple sources close to President Trump say Guglielmi’s claim is false. They say that the head of the Trump protective detail and Secret Service officers protecting the president had all requested additional help for months and been denied it by their superiors within the agency, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).” If Trump is correct that God saved his life, and it sure looks that way, he understands there is something else at work in America. This is not secular politics. This is something more sinister. As such, his enemies won’t stop at one attempt. I believe, based on my research, other assassination plots are already underway. There is no end to the list of those who want Trump dead. The Deep State and America’s Enemies My special report, issued many weeks ago, examines how federal agencies, left-wing extremists and Iranian terrorists are targeting President Trump by using KGB-style tactics and creating an atmosphere in which death threats againsat Trump are encouraged and assassination plots are carried out. The Hitler charge originated with the Revolutionary Communist Party, one of many Marxist groups in the United States. When I visited its Revolution Books headquarters in Harlem a few years ago, I picked up a copy of one of their old issues, dating back to 2016, showing Trump with a Hitler mustache and headlined, “Mein Trumpf.” This is where Biden and the Democrats get their marching orders on how to inspire their zealots. “We do not know the motive of the shooter yet,” Biden said on Sunday night. The motive was to kill Trump, another Hitler, according to the Democrats. There are reports that Trump's would-be assassin has been identified as Thomas Matthew Crooks but a video surfaced showing someone by that name saying “You got the wrong guy!” So-called “fact-checkers” dispute this. What we do know is that a Trump supporter, firefighter Cory Camperatore, was killed, and that other Trump supporters spotted the shooter on the roof, alerted the authorities, and nothing was done about it. A “Republican” Who Snapped? The media thought investigating the alleged political affiliation of the shooter would somehow prove something. The media trumpet the news that he was a registered Republican, as if this takes the Democrats off the hook. More recently, in 2021, he reportedly made a $15 donation to a “liberal PAC” known as ActBlue on January 20, 2021 — Biden’s Inauguration Day. If he was once a Republican, something changed or snapped when Biden was “elected” and he gave money to this “progressive” group. As we see in the Trump case and the plot to assassinate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, there are many “activists” operating freely in American society without monitoring by the FBI who can be programmed to kill, especially when the target is supposed to be another Hitler. On Sunday night, we began hearing propaganda from the FBI that the would-be assassin Thomas Crooks was a “loner.” It’s complete propaganda designed to take the FBI off the hook for failing to monitor these “activists.” The Kavanaugh Case Consider that Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s would-be assassin, Nicholas John Roske, was a pro-abortion activist upset about the draft of an anti-abortion decision leaked in advance from the Supreme Court. With the murder of Kavanaugh, he had declared on various Internet sites that he was going to stop the pro-abortion decision Roe v. Wade “from being overturned.” In on-line conversations, Roske exhibited symptoms of gender dysphoria and called himself “Sophie,” indicating he identified as female. Clearly, he was a product of Cultural Marxism, a philosophy pushed by the national Democratic Party. Finally, it must be noted that, by calling his opponents Nazis and fascists, Joe Biden is sounding like former Soviet KGB Colonel and Russian President Vladimir Putin offering a justification for war against Ukraine. In typical communist fashion, Putin had said Ukraine was full of fascists and this justified his invasion of Ukraine. Biden Uses Putin’s Playbook Biden’s “anti-fascist” and “anti-Hitler” rhetoric against Trump and the Republicans makes him sound like the Russian he supposedly wants to defeat in Ukraine. Perhaps Biden and Putin are on the same side after all. Everybody knows that Putin understands how to wage assassinations abroad. Russian assassins are now believed to be operating in Europe, in one case trying to arrange the assassination of Armin Papperger, the CEO of Germans weapons manufacturer Rheinmetall. He was said to be just one of several defense industry executives across Europe reportedly targeted by the Kremlin because of their support for Ukraine. With backing from foreign intelligence services, such as Moscow’s “Murder International,” which still exists under KGB Colonel Vladimir Putin, the professional hit men can communicate through secret messages and cover their tracks back to China, Russia, or Iran. We know the Iranians want to kill Trump, too. They don’t forgive him for taking out their terrorist leader Soleimani. Don’t forget that the Russians shot down a plane carrying Rep. Larry McDonald, a conservative member of Congress who published research in the Congressional Record on the communist threat. When Korean Airlines flight 007 was shot down on September 1, 1983, 269 people, including McDonald, perished. The Russians Killed Rep. McDonald Conservative journalist Jeffrey St. John’s book, Day of the Cobra, tells the story. In the foreword, then-Senator Jesse Helms, another staunch anti-communist, called the shootdown intentional and premeditated. A strong anti-communist, Rep. Lawrence Patton McDonald had said about Yuri Andropov, the head of the Russian KGB, “Andropov is a deadly cobra who mesmerizes his victims before striking.” McDonald had already raised publicly the question of KGB involvement in the attempt on the life of Pope John Paul II. In the case of the pope, the KGB used a Bulgarian operative to carry out the plot. There’s no way the would-be assassin of former President Trump acted alone. In the future, more attacks can be expected. We can’t rule out anything, including shooting down Trump’s plane down and calling it a mechanical malfunction. The FBI and CIA did that in the TWA 800 case. To recap, the FBI, CIA, and the NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board) concluded that a mysterious fuel tank explosion brought down TWA 800 in 1996, which resulted in the deaths of 230 passengers and crew on July 17, 1996. But eyewitnesses saw missiles hit the plane. To discredit them, the CIA produced a video showing the huge nose-less jet ascending like a rocket, an aeronautical impossibility, supposedly after the fuel tank exploded. The purpose of that cover-up was to ensure that President Bill Clinton won the upcoming presidential election. He did so. This time, a decision was made to eliminate Donald J. Trump from the race, and a cover-up of official wrongdoing is now underway.
![]() How Trump's “Red Wave” Could Fizzle Out By Cliff Kincaid Two recent polls and one major analysis of the polling data are finding that, despite “electability concerns,” Joe Biden is either beating or tied with President Trump. This suggests that another “Red Wave” will fizzle out, Trump will lose in November, and the Democrats will keep the Senate and take the House. Biden or his replacement is still favored to win because the Democratic Party is not organized around one man but Barack Hussein Obama’s “Permanent Revolution” strategy of grabbing political power, based on the exploitation of alienated groups. Obama operative Steve Phillips devised this strategy of capturing a majority of the electorate. He calls it the “New American Majority,” meaning they have a lock on at least 51 percent of the electorate, consisting of people of color (23 percent of all eligible voters) and white progressives (28 percent of all eligible voters). These people are considered victims of the “white power structure” and the “patriarchy.” This “New American Majority” also incorporates those with a secular, humanist, atheist, or New Age mentality. The newest “constituency” consists of dope smokers. This coalition is growing larger every day because of the breakdown in society and the destruction of traditional values. It grows in strength because of the “permanent revolution” that guides Marxist strategies of gaining and maintaining power, even in so-called “democracies.” In short, those who believe in traditional American values are declining in numbers, power, and influence. All that we are hearing these days from the conservative and liberal media is that Biden is in trouble, that the Democrats are in turmoil. But this conflict is an integral part of the constant “struggle” that defines the advance of Marxism. For Marxists, the struggle is the essence of historical progress. To non-Marxists, it appears chaotic. But the “permanent revolution” of constant change and struggle was articulated by Karl Marx, the father of communism. This is true on the global level as well. Whether we are talking about Islam’s “struggle,” Hitler’s “My Struggle,” or the Marxist dialectic of “struggle,” the purpose is to overthrow Christian civilization, creating a post-Christian and socialist world. Biden may leave the scene and be replaced by younger and more aggressive self-styled “progressives.” It doesn’t matter. This is a side show. The Democrats believe they can defeat Trump and the Republicans no matter who is at the top of the ticket. Their success in the 2022 elections, when a “Red Wave” was predicted but failed to materialize, proves their point. Even with Biden at the top of the ticket, they are favored to win. Trump supporters may find it hard to believe, but the polls do not look good for Trump and they look even worse for Republicans running for the Senate and the House. ABC notes: “Americans divide 46-47% between Biden and Trump if the election were today, almost identical to a 44-46% ABC/Ipsos poll result in April. Among registered voters (though there’s plenty of time to register) it’s an absolute tie, 46-46%.” A Marist poll of registered voters nationally finds Biden beating Trump 50% to 48%. At the same time, an analysis of the 2024 presidential election by the respected group known as FiveThirtyEight finds that Biden is still favored to win, despite his poor debate performance. We were warned about the Marxist strategy back in 1961, when the (now-defunct) House Committee on Un-American Activities analyzed the book How Parliament can Play a Revolutionary Part in Transition to Socialism, explaining how “democratic nations” can be transformed into communist countries. The author was Jan Kozak, historian of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia. Meanwhile, the Republican party has now coalesced around one man, Donald J. Trump, who, according to conservative author J.R. Hawkins, is running on “Grievance, Revenge and Retribution.” His prominent supporters in the media like Stephen K. Bannon and Alex Jones are either in prison or going bankrupt. It's not a good look. “Trump has some really bad advisers around him that are turning MAGA into a fringe movement,” says Hawkins. I warned in a recent column that Trump “is surrounded by yes men and people wearing MAGA hats who are blind to the reality of what is happening on the ground.” In this context, remember the non-existent “Red Wave” election of 2022? The so-called “news” organizations promoting the Red Wave propaganda included the New York Post, Fox News, Fox Business, Mike Lindell’s Frank Speech channel, the Clay & Buck radio show, PJ Media, Townhall, the Daily Caller, and the Real America’s Voice network. These are the same media organizations now insisting to their conservative viewers and listeners that the Democrats are now in turmoil and headed toward a massive defeat in November. Tragically, the stage was set when President Trump gave an amnesty to Barack Hussein Obama, his predecessor, and Hillary Clinton, his competitor in 2016. Both escaped justice and launched the Russia-gate hoax while Trump has recently been sitting in a courtroom, facing allegations of sexual assault, corporate malfeasance, cover-ups, and even espionage. These charges have taken their toll and galvanized America’s new Marxist majority. As you saw in Biden’s Detroit speech on Friday, this is what the Democratic Party’s campaign will be all about. The speech generated headlines about a fiery Biden, backed up by chants against Trump of “Lock Him Up.” Trump’s advisers have no understanding of Marxism and how the current civil war is being waged by the Democrats. But Steve Phillips, the clever operative, has written a new book, How We Win the Civil War, on how a total Marxist victory can be achieved. In desperation, Trump is moving left on social issues such as abortion and homosexuality. He thinks attracting a few liberal women and “gay” conservatives is the key to winning. It is a big mistake that risks alienating many conservatives inclined to vote for him. They will either sit out the election or vote for Randall Terry of the Constitution Party. One conservative pro-lifer who is disillusioned by Trump’s backtracking on the right to life thinks of the MAGA movement this way: “I think of the tragic Thunderbirds air accident of 1982. As you may recall, the famous Thunderbirds, the USAF aerobatic team, was practicing for one of their air shows. They were trained to follow the leader. The leader’s stabilizer stuck, and he slammed into the ground at 400 mph. So did the rest of his team.” Rather than appease the left, Randall Terry proclaims that America is in a “Life Crisis” because the nation no longer respects human life and releases a video that dares to call out the “liars, perverts, mad men, and baby killers.” The video highlights U.S. government corruption, involvement in foreign wars, crime in the cities, anti-white ideologies in schools, open borders, and millions of dead from abortion. In the absence of such a direct message about the stakes regarding America’s future, the Republican Party will fall into oblivion, as it just did in Britain, or lose to a “Popular Front” of communists, socialists, and greens that helped turn back a right-wing challenge to the establishment in France. After defeating the conservatives, the French Communist Party leader Fabien Roussel declared, “It is time to open a new stage for the left.” It is already happening in America.
Pro-Life Organizations, Activities, and License Plates Labeled as 'Terrorist Groups' at Army's Anti-Terrorism Training: Members of Congress Demand DoD Investigation
Official release: NEWS PROVIDED BY The Children First Foundation July 12, 2024 CROMWELL, Conn., July 12, 2024 /Christian Newswire/ -- On July 10, an Army anti-terrorism training presentation was held for soldiers stationed at Fort Liberty (formerly Fort Bragg) in North Carolina. After presenting a slide condemning ISIS as a Terrorist Group, another slide, also titled "Terrorist Groups," was presented listing Pro-Life Organizations, Crisis [Pregnancy] Centers, Pro-Life Mass Demonstrations and Protests (i.e., March for Life, Life Chains, The Truth Display, etc.), Sidewalk Counseling, and "Choose Life License Plates" as more Terrorist Groups. On July 11, thanks to a social media photograph of this slide that quickly went viral, Fort Liberty responded on X that "these slides will no longer be used, and all future training products will be reviewed to ensure they align with the current DoD anti-terrorism guidance." "As President of The Children First Foundation, a charitable Adoption and Safe Havens advocacy organization and the official sponsor of the 'New York Choose Life License Plate,' I am very grateful to Senator Ted Budd (R-NC) and to Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY) who have condemned this extremely troubling incident as 'despicable' and called for immediate investigations." -- Dr. Elizabeth Rex Sen. Ted Budd's post on X states: "Smearing pro-life Americans as terrorists is despicable. The materials briefed at Fort Liberty are disturbing. As soon as I learned of it, I directed my team to contact Army and Fort Liberty officials. They have begun an investigation. The Army must get to the bottom of this and see that it never happens again." Rep. Elise Stefanik's post on X states: "The Biden Administration's Department of Defense is allegedly attempting to teach our service members that pro-life organizations in America are 'terrorist groups.' This is despicable. @POTUS, @SecDef, and @SecArmy must immediately condemn and open an investigation into this vile and dangerous attempted indoctrination of our service members." The Children First Foundation is just one of over 30 official sponsors of "Choose Life License Plates" that have been approved with bi-partisan support in 35 states since the first pro-adoption "Choose Life License Plate" hit the road in Florida back in 2000. The faces of two smiling children and the words "Choose Life" appear on most of the "Choose Life" license plates, and the funding raised by these DMV-approved specialty plates is sent to pro-life Pregnancy Care Centers in each state that generously help pregnant women who so often need moral and financial support when facing an unplanned pregnancy. Since the year 2000, over $32 million dollars has been raised and distributed to countless pro-life Pregnancy Centers that promote all of the "pro-life choices" including Parenting, Open Adoption, Closed Adoption, and even the Anonymous "Safe Haven" Option which is legal in all 50 states. The Adoption Option is a "good choice" that everyone can support. It is common ground. Getting a pro-adoption "Choose Life License Plate" is a great way to help pregnant women "choose life" and "consider the Adoption Options." To make a donation or to order a "Choose Life License Plate," please visit www.choose-life.org and click on your State. Thank you for putting "Children First." SOURCE The Children First Foundation CONTACT: Dr. Elizabeth Rex, President, 914-629-3710, [email protected] ![]() Biden Celebrates Gay Violence, Anal Sex, and STDs By Cliff Kincaid You may not have heard about Joe Biden’s bizarre pro-gay speech because of its timing. One day after his disastrous debate with President Trump, he announced the opening of a national taxpayer-supported “visitor center” dedicated to rioting homosexuals who attacked the police on June 28, 1969, in New York City. In this speech, Biden didn’t make any gaffes. Rather, it was the substance of the speech, including the defense of gay violence, that was newsworthy. In America, tragically, both major political parties have endorsed the gay lifestyle, with the MAGA Trump 2024 GOP platform dropping opposition to so-called “gay marriage.” Back in 2015, my group America's Survival, Inc. (ASI) held a conference entitled “Crimes against Nature and the Constitution: Cultural Marxism and America's Moral Collapse,” on the growing power of the communist-inspired gay rights movement. At the event, I warned that “The Republican Party, under the influence of high-priced consultants, has proven to be incapable of understanding, let alone combating, cultural Marxism and the liberal media elites. Some Republican Party elites are trying to marginalize and isolate traditional conservatives – as well as drive millions of Christians out of the Republican Party.” This has happened under Trump. But most “conservative” media and even Catholic groups are remaining silent. They realize that if the “news” gets out regarding the hostile gay takeover of BOTH major political parties, millions of Christians could decide to sit out the November elections and the Trump campaign could suffer politically. So they are active participants in the cover-up. The acceptance of homosexuals as a legitimate minority group, entitled to the sacrament of marriage, was established by Justice Anthony Kennedy, who was nominated to the court in 1987 by Republican President Ronald Reagan. There was a time when conservative icon and visionary Howard Phillips referred to “anal sex practitioners,” a factual reference to how male homosexuals have sex. The term is even more accurate today, as the CDC reports, “Men who have sex with men (MSM) are more likely to get sexually transmitted infections (STIs),” including HIV/AIDS, which is spread through anal sex. Now, in what are called “the first U.S. federal guidelines on the topic,” the federal government is now recommending high resolution anoscopy (HRA) “to help detect and treat precancer and prevent anal cancer for people with HIV,” as well as “Men who have sex with men and transgender women ages 35 and older.” The procedure is designed to examine:
All of this has developed from what Democrats called the “Stonewall Rebellion,” when homosexual riots were staged in 1969 at a seedy Mafia-run bar known as the Stonewall Inn. Several police officers trying to enforce the law at the sleazy establishment were injured by violent homosexuals. I’m sure you’ve heard about January 6th and the hundreds of Americans who entered the Capitol and were locked up as a result. But have you heard about the Stonewall riots? If not, why not? I usually don’t read the gay press, but I was fascinated by the story in the Philadelphia Gay News about Biden’s speech, which was delivered at the “grand opening” of New York City’s Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center. The Stonewall Inn was known as a haven for chicken hawks -- older males who prefer younger males for sexual partners. One of them, Ed Murphy, has been honored as a Stonewall Inn vet. Writer Terrence P. Jeffrey called it a “hangout for teenage transvestites.” The "grand opening" of New York City's Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center was a logical consequence of President Barack Hussein Obama designating a national monument at the site of the “Stonewall Rebellion” in 2016. In fact, the process was begun on June 11, 1999, when President Clinton announced he was enrolling the Stonewall Inn and the surrounding streets of New York City on the National Register of Historic Places. A group called Pride Live then “secured the lease to the long-empty 51 Christopher Street storefront and reimagined and transformed the 2,100 square foot space into the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center (SNMVC), the first LGBTQIA+ visitor center within the National Park System.” Incredibly, your tax dollars are making this possible. The National Park Service (NPS) is a bureau of the Department of the Interior. The NPS website about Stonewall shows people waving rainbow flags and a drag queen. The Philadelphia Gay News story began this way: “No national news network telecast reported on President Joe Biden’s address at the opening of New York City’s Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center to commemorate Pride Month on June 28. The LGBTQ+ history event was held fewer than 24 hours after Biden delivered a monumentally flawed debate performance in Atlanta the previous evening.” One can understand the media being preoccupied with Biden’s debate performance but having a president endorse gay riots is newsworthy as well. It demonstrates that the Democratic Party supports violence when it serves the interests of a constituency group it wants to cultivate as voting bloc. The homosexual organ referred to Biden as “the staunchest LGBTQ+ ally in the White House in history.” At the event, he called it the “first ever LGBTQ+ visitor center in the National Parks of America.” Biden went on to say, “It matters. We remain in a battle for the soul of America. But I look around at the pride, hope and light that all of you bring, and I know it’s a battle we are going to win and continue to make progress.” Jill Biden and her daughter Ashley Biden hosted the Pride Celebration at the White House event on Wednesday. “My dad has built the most pro-equality administration” in history, Ashley Biden said on June 26, one day before the debate. This is the same Ashley Biden who wrote a diary describing showers taken with her father when she was a child as “probably not appropriate.” At the June 28 Stonewall event, Biden was joined by pop star Elton John to mark the 55th anniversary of the first night of riots. Biden praised Elton John and described the Stonewall Inn as a “beloved bar” that “became the site of a call to cry for freedom, dignity, and equality and respect — a rebellion that galvanized the LBGTQ+ community all across the nation and, quite frankly, around the world.” Biden went on to say, “…you’d be amazed the number of places I am, whether its India or other places, where people talk about the gay movement here in the United States of America. I mean it.” “LGBTQ+ people are some of the most inspiring people I know,” he said. The modern gay rights movement was started by Harry Hay, a Communist Party member who divorced his wife after contracting the venereal disease known as syphilis, which can result in damage to the brain, nerves, eyes, and heart.
|