Fire Tucker Carlson and Don Lemon
Fire Tucker Carlson and Don Lemon
By Cliff Kincaid
When CNN’s Don Lemon sounded like a sexist, the Rupert Murdoch media empire, including Fox News and the New York Post, urged his firing. Meanwhile, a Fox News personality, Tucker Carlson, who attracts New York Post journalists on his show, is being permitted to shill for Russia’s KGB dictator and denigrate the fight for freedom in Ukraine. Tucker is doing far more damage than Lemon could ever do.
Contrast Tucker’s love affair with Putin to Joshua Jones, a 24-year-old from Memphis, Tennessee, who traveled to fight with Ukraine against the Russian invaders. “My son believed in the fight,” Joshua’s father Jeffrey Jones said. “He believed that their Russian aggression against a freedom-loving people was worth the sacrifice.”
A veteran of the U.S. Army, he was killed by the Russians and died on the battlefield of Ukraine in August of last year.
Local station ABC24 reported, “Initially joining the Norman Brigade, a group of foreign fighters fighting on the side of Ukraine, he was nicknamed ‘Tactical Jesus’ for his long hair, beard, and devout Christian faith.”
“His faith was amazing,” his mother told CNN. His remains and personal effects, including a Christian cross, were returned. Today, patches and stencils with Joshua’s image are being worn by soldiers and even being placed on captured Russian war equipment.
At a memorial service, Ukrainian Armed Forces Major Gusovskyy said about Jones, “He was a true warrior and he was exemplary and he was sure about what he was doing.”
Major Gusovskyy was interviewed by Jacqui Heinrich on Fox News on Saturday, where he paid tribute to Joshua Jones.
But the night before, Tucker Carlson was promoting the pro-Putin “Rage Against the War Machine” rally scheduled for D.C. on Sunday.
Tucker is sounding like the Fox News version of RT or Russia Today, a “news” outlet financed by the Kremlin and called KGB-TV by its critics.
“President Putin has an alluring combination of strength with gentleness,” said Tara Reade, the guest on Tucker’s show. Several speakers at the rally have documented ties to RT.
You may remember that Reade is the woman who accused Joe Biden of a sexual assault. It turns out she is having a love affair, of a plutonic nature, with Vladimir Putin. Suddenly she has become an expert on foreign affairs.
Fox described her appearance this way: “Author Tara Reade gives her reasoning for attending an anti-war rally in Washington, DC this weekend on Tucker Carlson Tonight.”
In fact, she went on an anti-American diatribe, denouncing U.S. imperialism, the defensive NATO alliance, and aid to Ukraine. “We want peace,” she said. “No more endless war,” she added.
Tucker nodded in agreement, saying about her perspective, “We’re proud to air it.”
Her perspective – that the U.S. should ignore Russian aggression – ignores the fact that the war was started by Putin, with the first invasion launched under Barack Hussein Obama. After President Clinton negotiated a “Budapest Memorandum” that sent Ukraine’s nuclear weapons back to Moscow, in exchange for Russia’s promise to respect Ukraine’s territorial integrity, the Russians knew they could get away with murder.
Ignoring this fact, Tucker allowed Reade to claim there was a “kill list” of opponents of aid to Ukraine that turned out to be a list of politicians, academics, and activists promoting Russian propaganda. It reportedly included former Democrat Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, now a Fox News contributor.
Looking back, we can see that Donald J. Trump turned out not to be the Russian agent portrayed by his political enemies. But Tucker and other “conservatives,” such as Stephen K. Bannon, seem to be auditioning for the role. They want to abandon Ukraine.
Tragically, however, the president’s son, Donald Trump Jr., has demonstrated that he is not like his father. Referring to the Palestine, Ohio, nightmare, he says, “Not one more cent for Ukraine till Americans get the care that they deserve and desperately need. Enough is enough of this insanity.”
With this statement, he sounds just as stupid as Tucker. It doesn’t make any sense to punish Ukraine for the sins of the Biden Administration here at home.
The true spirit of America was exemplified by Joshua Jones, who served his country AND died for freedom in Ukraine. It reminds me of the foreign support America received, especially from France, in our successful fight for independence.
To cite another example, Poland, said to be Putin’s next target in Europe, helped the American revolution succeed.
“The signs of this friendship stand in our nation’s capital,” President Trump declared in his speech to the Polish people. “Just steps from the White House, we’ve raised statues of men with names like Pułaski and Kościuszko. (Applause.) The same is true in Warsaw, where street signs carry the name of George Washington, and a monument stands to one of the world’s greatest heroes, Ronald Reagan. (Applause.)”
Polish nobleman Casimir Pulaski was a brigadier general in the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War. Polish freedom fighter Thaddeus Kosciuszko was a military engineer who designed fortifications during the American Revolution.
Thomas Jefferson called him “As pure a son of liberty, as I have ever known…”
One of George Washington’s famous quotes was that the new nation should avoid entangling alliances with other countries. At the same time, he realized that without the support of other nations, America would not exist.
Present-day “conservatives” like Tucker and Bannon ignore the foreign role in America’s revolution and break with the Reagan doctrine of support for anti-communist freedom fighters, while demanding that America cease its aid to the people of Ukraine. They are betraying the spirit of America.
Regarding Don Lemon and Tucker Carlson, fire them both. Let’s move on from these poor excuses for American journalism.
*Cliff Kincaid is president of America’s Survival, Inc. www.usasurvival.org
We Are in a State of War
We Are in a State of War
By Cliff Kincaid
Washington talking heads would rather talk about flying objects than the enemies behind most of them, China and Russia. We are in a state of war. Meanwhile, despite trillions of dollars spent on infrastructure, our roads, bridges, and railways continue to deteriorate. At the same time, federal programs that millions depend on are going broke.
Ukraine, on the front lines of a war we need to win, is begging for weapons. And yet former Reps. Tulsi Gabbard and Ron Paul are participating in a loony left “Rage Against the War Machine” rally in D.C. on February 19 demanding a Russian victory by starving the people of Ukraine of the weapons they need for self-defense.
First, however, a personal note about the financial crisis and national bankruptcy. Having passed the age which gives me access to Social Security and Medicare, I have learned more about how these federal programs work – or don’t work.
Medicare is going broke and forcing seniors to search, sometimes in vain, for doctors willing to take Medicare patients. This is because the payment system is on “an unsustainable path that is jeopardizing patient access to physicians,” according to the American Medical Association.
I have heard forecasts that the system will be short of more than 100,000 doctors in a decade because many will forsake the Medicare system to pursue private and expensive so-called “boutique” practices.
I know eye doctors who are seeing 35 patients or more a day because that is the only way they can generate enough income to make the practice profitable at the rate acceptable to Medicare.
What does Joe Biden intend to do about that? Nothing. Instead, he singles out Republican Senator Rick Scott for daring to recommend ways to solve the problems inherent in both federal programs.
We know politicians lie. But Biden’s lies seem to be pathological, since he has a history of lying about others and himself.
What Senator Scott advocated, in his “Rescue America” plan, was to recommend, “All federal legislation sunsets in 5 years. If a law is worth keeping, Congress can pass it again.” This has been deliberately distorted by Biden and his fellow travelers into the end of Social Security and Medicare.
What Scott is proposing is to fix the programs. Here’s what else he says about them:
Regarding the UFOs, a current topic of interest to the talking heads, Republicans are demanding that Biden speak to the American people. What a waste of time. He can’t be trusted to say anything that’s true. Why waste our time with a national address on this topic?
The bottom line is that China and Russia want to destroy our nation and our allies. What else is new? The issue is that the authorities are not protecting our nation. They won’t protect our people and they waste trillions of our dollars on useless and made-in-China green energy programs.
Clearly, Biden has no plan. That’s why he is called China Joe.
Private companies are no better. Look at Ford’s plan to build an EV battery plant in Michigan with a Chinese “partner” – the same regime that killed more than one million Americans through COVID.
Yet, UFOs have been occupying the attention of the major media and the politicians for more than a week.
The destruction of a Chinese balloon caused Biden’s Secretary of State to cancel a visit to China. Why was he going in the first place?
Meanwhile, House Republicans have created a new China committee, the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, to be headed by Republican Rep. Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin. What good will that do?
We already know the character of the regime. It is a communist regime. It wants to destroy America.
We have to get on a war footing.
The only thing that will save us is a bigger and better and more ruthless military establishment than China and Russia combined. We need more nuclear weapons capable of obliterating both of those nations, and we need a president who will use them, or at least threaten to use them, for the benefit of the American people.
If this requires more military spending, so be it. National defense is a constitutional requirement.
Then, and only then, can we effectively deal with other federal spending programs.
Communists Target Conservatives with Disinformation
By Cliff Kincaid
There are several major themes of communist disinformation which permeate parts of the “conservative” movement. One is that because former President Trump was falsely accused of being a Russian agent, all allegations of Russian influence in the American political system are without merit. The second is that a U.S. alliance with Russia is possible and that American support for Ukraine is driving Russia into the arms of the Communist Chinese. A subsidiary is that the Jewish president of Ukraine is a Nazi.
In the first place, the Russians originated the idea that Trump was a Russian agent. The Steele dossier which drove the FBI investigation contained Russian disinformation from Russian sources about Trump. All of this has been firmly established.
It’s a fact that the Democratic Party utilized that disinformation for the purpose of destroying Trump. But the Russians were behind it from the beginning.
What this tells us about the current Russian regime, led by former KGB Colonel Vladimir Putin, is that not much has changed from the days when Russia was Soviet Russia. Russia is as anti-American as the old Soviet Union. The invasion of Ukraine, first under Obama and then under Biden, reflects the old Soviet ambition of expanding territory and in fact conquering the world. It is noteworthy that Putin, who wants to re-establish the old Soviet Union, didn’t launch his second invasion of Ukraine under Trump. Putin feared Trump’s response. For his part, Trump had consistently advised the Europeans to do more for their own energy needs and defense through NATO.
A Putin comrade, Islamist Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov, now openly says that anti-communist Poland is the next target after Ukraine.
It is apparent that Russia has a very close ally, Communist China, which backs Putin’s war in Ukraine and is seen by some as the leader of the World Communist Movement. Ideologically, this is the case. Our book The Sword of Revolution and the Communist Apocalypse documents Chinese leadership in the area of Marxist dialectics, a form of warfare that has confused many in the West into thinking the communist world is divided in its ultimate purpose – world communism.
Russia was the first communist nation on earth and remains so to this day. The old institutions of the Soviet Union, including political parties, have remained in place but have changed their names, in order to fool the West. Russia uses the same tactics and strategy of Soviet Russia. One change has been that Russia today targets conservatives in Europe and America. Jean Robin, author of France, a Colony of communist China, hosted Jeff Nyquist, Trevor Loudon and myself for a program on this very topic. Click here to watch. We address modern variations of communist defector Anatoliy Golitsyn’s charges, made in two books, New Lies For Old, and Perestroika Deception.
It was Mikhail Gorbachev, one of Putin’s biggest supporters, whose original mission was to keep communism going under a different name while continuing his commitment to a one-world communist state. He said on November 2, 1987, “We are moving towards a new world, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” This statement concluded his report, “October and Perestroika: The Revolution Continues.”
For those who still cling to the fiction of the “Sino-Soviet spit,” the facts show that Communist China was the official spawn of the Soviet Union. Bertil Haggman, director of the Center for Research on Geopolitics in Sweden, notes that the Communist Party of China was actually founded by a Bolshevik Soviet agent, Grigori Naumovich Voitinsky, a Russian born in Belarus in 1893. Hagmann tells me, “Voitinsky, the real founder of CCP, grew up in the U.S., joined the American Socialist Party, was active in the USA and Canada. He went to Soviet Russia after the Bolshevik coup d’état and was in China as a Comintern agent. Little seems to be known about his time as a socialist in the West.”
Looking back at the history of socialists in the West, Putin himself declared that “…the[U.S.] Democratic Party is traditionally closer to the so-called liberal values, closer to Social Democratic ideas, if compared to Europe. And it was from the Social Democratic environment that the Communist Party evolved.” He went on to say, “…I was a member of the Soviet Communist Party for nearly 20 years, or more precisely 18 years. I was a rank-and-file member, but it can be said that I believed in the party’s ideas. I still like many of these left-wing values. Equality and fraternity. What is bad about them? In fact, they are akin to Christian values.”
Putin “left” the Soviet Communist Party, which exists today as the Russian Communist Party, and established a “new” political party, United Russia. The change was part of a strategy to get Russian access to international and American financial institutions.
This background helps us understand that when Democratic Party operatives in the U.S. intelligence establishment dismissed reports of Hunter Biden’s laptop as Russian-inspired, they were in fact serving the interests of Russia. It’s strange but true. This kind of attack follows the pattern of the Russia-gate investigation – using charges against supposed Russian influence to divert attention from what the Russians are really doing.
As we know, the laptop was real and sheds light on influence peddling by Hunter benefitting both the Russians and the Chinese. But on another more important level, such influence helps explain why the American establishment, including the FBI and CIA, seemingly fail to understand the world communist movement. Russian infiltration of both agencies goes back decades, with the latest example being Charles F. McGonigal, formerly the FBI’s top counterintelligence official in New York. The tip of the iceberg, he was indicted for serving Russian interests. He could spill the beans of Russian influence in the entire FBI.
On still another level, that of street action, various communist groups with an allegiance to Moscow or Beijing are still active in the United States. Yet they are not subject to surveillance by the FBI. They include the ANSWER Coalition, a front of the communist Workers World Party which is behind a March 18 demonstration at the White House in Washington, D.C. Interestingly, a key demand, “End the $100 Billion in arms shipments to Ukraine,” is something heard regularly on so-called conservative Stephen K. Bannon’s “War Room” show on the Real America’s Voice and Frank Speech channels.
The Republican House of Representatives, which is now investigating Communist China, should revisit the work of the old House Internal Security Committee, which produced several important reports on the communist movement, including a 1974 congressional study, “The Workers World Party and its Front Organizations.” This committee, now defunct, was the successor to the House Committee on Un-American Activities, which uncovered dramatic communist infiltration of Hollywood and forced the studios to clean house.
Exposing China, as the Republican House is now doing, while operatives like Bannon and personalities like Tucker Carlson make excuses for Russian aggression against Ukraine undercuts the anti-communist movement that President Reagan led. We need a united anti-communist approach that does not forgive the crimes of Russia and opposes the Russian imperialism of Vladimir Putin.
The Biden Doctrine of Demoralization and Defeat
By Cliff Kincaid
While advocating more weapons for Ukraine, former Obama official Michael McFaul says in a Foreign Affairs article “In return for receiving these weapons, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy could sign a legally binding agreement to not use these weapons to strike targets inside Russia.” There you have it, in clear precise terms: Ukraine is not being permitted to win.
This is another no-win war that the American foreign policy establishment wants fought in such a way as to guarantee defeat for those whose country was invaded.
If the experts at the Council on Foreign Relations have their way, Ukraine will have to settle for a bombed-out country and the corporate and financial elites will resume business-as-usual with a KGB regime in Moscow determined to resurrect the Soviet empire.
Not surprisingly, supporters of Ukraine are coming to the conclusion that, under Joe Biden, Ukraine isn't supposed to win but to bleed and then negotiate and certify Russia’s capture of eastern Ukraine and Crimea. That means Russia wins, and it can set its sights on other countries, such as anti-communist Poland.
Joe Biden, you’re no Ronald Reagan.
Reagan, who fought communists in Hollywood and understood their strategy and tactics, had a Reagan Doctrine as president to overthrow communist and enemy regimes. But with his declaration that the U.S. will not send advanced F-16s to Ukraine, despite repeated requests, we have a new “Biden Doctrine” of demoralization and defeat.
Meanwhile, the United Nations, functioning as a communist front, does nothing about the illegal North Korean nuclear weapons program while China Joe refuses to consider re-deployment of nuclear weapons to South Korea to counter the communist threat. South Korea’s conservative ruling People Power Party will have to consider building nuclear weapons of its own.
In regard to Ukraine, McFaul’s proposal for a “legally binding agreement” prohibiting military action against Vladimir Putin’s KGB regime is another sell-out that allows Russia, China, and its allies to remain on the military offensive around the world.
This approach reminds us of the Budapest Memorandum devised under Democratic President Bill Clinton that returned Ukraine’s nuclear weapons to Moscow. In return, Ukraine’s independence was supposed to be guaranteed by the U.S., Britain, and Russia.
Ukraine was disarmed, but this was predictably followed by a Russian invasion.
Advocating more appeasement of Moscow, McFaul wants Ukraine to promise not to take the fight to Russia, a primary source of global conflict and instability since its communist revolution in 1917.
McFaul’s “advice” has to be regarded as suspect because his credentials include serving for five years in the Obama administration, from 2012 to 2014 as U.S. Ambassador to Russia. The first invasion of Ukraine occurred under Obama in 2014 and the second under Obama’s vice president, Joe Biden, in 2022.
The Obama/Biden policies have brought the world to this point.
After the invasion in 2014, Obama/Biden authorized a pathetic aid package for Ukraine that featured radios, patrol boats, body armor, helmets, blankets, and night-vision goggles. He “stuck to his refusal to provide weapons or other lethal military gear to Ukraine,” as noted by the Wall Street Journal at the time.
“What was democratic President Obama’s position in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2014?” asks foreign policy writer and Ukraine supporter Victor Rud. Obama’s position was that “We do very little trade with Ukraine and geopolitically what happens in Ukraine doesn’t pose a threat to us.” This statement captures the mindset of those who made Russia’s aggression possible and who continue to make excuses for Russia’s war crimes today.
With the 2022 invasion approaching its first anniversary on February 24, former President Trump says in a new video, “I think we helped lead Russia into that war by saying, well, if they took a small part of the country that would be okay. Such a tragic waste of human life.” He was referring to Biden’s statement before the war that NATO was divided on what to do if Russia launched a “minor incursion.”
McFaul’s recommendations for weapons are better than nothing, since there are some ostensibly pro-Trump Republicans, such as Stephen K. Bannon, who oppose any aid to Ukraine. Bannon has achieved a national platform against Ukraine through a channel called Real America’s Voice and Mike Lindell’s Frank Speech network and has financial connections to a controversial Chinese billionaire allegedly linked to Chinese officials by the name of Miles Guo.
Bannon comes across as a war hawk on China and Taiwan, saying America has a national interest there, but dismisses the Russian invasion of Ukraine as a “regional conflict.” He is part of a group of “conservatives” hoping to dominate the upcoming Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).
“Take down the Chinese Communist Party” is Bannon’s war cry, with an opening commercial featuring Miles Guo petting his cat on a yacht. It is truly bizarre.
The Reagan Doctrine
The real conservative position, dating back to the period of Ronald Reagan, is to support freedom fighters and anti-communist regimes around the globe. I attended several of CPAC gatherings in the 1980s when Reagan was the featured speaker and spoke of the evils of communism. Today, unfortunately, some in the MAGA movement speak approvingly of Putin and his KGB associates.
“By bending their knee to Putin,” Victor Rudd says of Stephen K. Bannon, Tucker Carlson, and their ilk, “they accept his caterwauling that the fall of the USSR was the greatest tragedy of the 20th century.”
True conservatives are being given a false choice -- Michael McFaul’s limited support option for Ukraine, under certain circumstances, or the Stephen K. Bannon approach of leaving the country completely at the mercy of Putin’s KGB regime.
McFaul’s article is somewhat helpful in the sense that he lists many different weapons systems that Ukraine desperately needs for national survival and hasn’t received. But he insists these only be used for defensive purposes. That’s a recipe for more bloodshed and a Russian victory.
To understand this approach, remember that Joe Biden, since his Senate days, has been an advocate of a New World Order and doesn’t seem to understand the nature of the foreign threats.
For his part, McFaul is worried that, “If the war drags through the end of the year without major Ukrainian victories, the Biden administration will struggle to obtain congressional renewal for a new military and economic assistance package, especially as the presidential election heats up with at least one major candidate, Donald Trump, who is not a fan of aid to Ukraine.”
The claim that Trump “is not a fan of aid to Ukraine” is misleading. He was not a fan of foreign aid in general as long as the countries receiving it were not doing enough for themselves and for America. Hence, he recommended that NATO countries pay for more of their own defense, a very wise course that might have kept Moscow at bay, and develop their own energy resources.
More recently, at a rally in Texas, Trump declared, “China is threatening Taiwan, Iran is on the cusp of a nuclear bomb, Russia may take over Ukraine... Joe Biden’s weakness and incompetence is creating a very real risk of World War III.”
The terms “weakness” and “incompetence” are more accurate than Michael McFaul’s claim in Foreign Affairs that Biden has shown “remarkable leadership in galvanizing the world to assist Ukraine in 2022.” Biden’s too little and too late approach has brought us to this perilous point.
As we enter 2023, we have a war in Europe, the threat of war in Asia, and two recent terror attacks in Jerusalem involved the murder of Israeli civilians and 1 Ukrainian citizen.
Under these circumstances, surrender is not an option.
Understanding the Enemy
Our book, Red Jihad: Moscow’s Final Solution for America and Israel, examines the communist strategy that is being employed not only against the United States, Europe, and Asia, but Israel. The key to understanding what has happened lies in the fact that Russian President Vladimir Putin is a former Soviet KGB colonel and his regime is based on the remnants of the old Soviet Union, including its military and intelligence establishment.
In Ukraine, we see the brutality of the old Soviet military and KGB. There’s no excuse for buying the nonsense that Putin is somehow unlike his Soviet predecessors.
The reorganization of the old Soviet Union has indeed confused many in the West. My co-author J.R. Nyquist devotes his section of the book to the “collapse” of the Soviet Union and Russia’s geopolitical strategy to defeat and destroy the West.
Fortunately, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu understands the Soviet roots of international terrorism and the threat to Israel. He has spoken of the “poisonous tree” that has given rise to groups like Hamas. In fact, as Netanyahu knows and as our book demonstrates, modern-day Islamic terrorism grew out of the communist networks and Arab regimes that the Soviets sponsored. The roots of the “poisonous tree” can still be found in Moscow. In fact, many of the terror organizations active today can be directly traced to Moscow.
At the same time, the Iranian regime is sending warships to the Western Hemisphere, including Brazil, as well as drones to Russia for use against Ukraine.
Therefore, we can see that Ukraine’s defeat of Russia would deal a major blow to the Communist China-Russia-Iran alliance threatening the West.
But in order for this to happen, conservatives have to be united against our enemies -- all of them -- and make it clear to the world that people like Bannon, Tucker, and Charlie Kirk do not speak for the conservative movement.
If Ukraine goes down, the conservative movement should not let itself be blamed for having greased the skids.
*Cliff Kincaid is president of America’s Survival, Inc. www.usasurvival.org
Bring Back the Reagan Doctrine
Dear Friends of America's Survival,
The Free World is fighting back.
Look at the headlines:
It's time to radically increase military support for Ukraine.
Read it here: The World War is Already Here.
If Ukraine falls, Taiwan is next.
Israel is showing the way out -- attack your enemies before they attack you.
For the right approach to Ukraine, read Republican Senator Tom Cotton's remarks here.
He says: It’s time to give Ukraine what it needs to throw out the Russian invaders, retake its sovereign territory, and win this war.
Don't believe the pro-Russian crap spewing from the likes of Bannon, Tucker, and Charlie Kirk.
Regime change in Moscow and Beijing! Overthrow the Mullahs! Then, replace China Joe!
Bring back the Reagan doctrine.
For America's Survival,
The World War is Already here
The World War is Already Here
By Cliff Kincaid
“Tanks To Ukraine” is a headline on the Breitbart news site that is portrayed as possibly provoking World War III. A Drudge Report headline about “a fierce new step by the West” took me to CNN. “War in Ukraine pushes Doomsday Clock forward” is how Axios described it. This is scare-mongering propaganda designed to frighten the West into backing down, when a united front against Russian imperialism is now taking shape.
The first communist nation on the face of the earth, Russia is today run by the morally bankrupt remnants of the old Soviet KGB in alliance with billionaire oligarchs that currently uses the Russian Orthodox Church as a spiritual front for justifying Russian imperialism. The regime is so corrupt that it got caught doping its athletes.
Today, Russia uses its left-over nuclear weapons from the Soviet days to scare the West into backing down in support of a former Soviet republic fighting for its national independence. In terms of conventional weapons, the United States and its allies have the capability to make sure Ukraine prevails, if only the U.S. has the win to win. That is an open question with Biden, long committed to a New World Order, in charge.
Meanwhile, Mexican cartels working with Communist China pour drugs in, killing about 100,000 Americans a year. The China virus continues to kill and maim Americans, with hundreds dying every day.
Worldwide, more than 6.7 million people have died, with 1.1 million deaths in the U.S.
The China-Russia alliance against America and the West is on full display.
Yet, Biden Secretary of State Antony Blinken is expected to travel to China in early February, not to demand reparations but to ensure that “ties between our countries can resume the healthy and stable course of development,” according to a communist official.
We are already engaged in a World War whether authorities want to admit it or not.
The scope of the intelligence failure regarding Russia in particular was addressed by then-Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), who said on CNN’s Jake Tapper show on April 12, 2016, that the U.S. government had badly “misjudged” the intentions of former KGB colonel Vladimir Putin “for many, many years.” He declared, “The biggest intelligence failure that we have had since 9/11 has been the inability to predict the leadership plans and intentions of the Putin regime in Russia.”
After the Russian invasion of Georgia in 2008, Nunes noted, the U.S. continued to engage diplomatically with the Russians, and “we continued to talk to the Russians, and then they invaded Eastern Ukraine.”
“We missed that,” he said. “And then we completely missed entirely when they put a new base, a new base with aircraft into the Mediterranean, into Syria. We just missed it. We were blind.”
After that, Russian invaded Ukraine under Obama in 2014, taking Crimea.
America’s current problem is having a weak Democratic president who seemed to dismiss an invasion of Ukraine as a minor “incursion,” then declared he was opposed to Russian aggression, but has failed to deliver the right kind of weapons Ukraine needs on a timely basis.
The Abrams main battle tanks for Ukraine announced by Biden should have been delivered months ago. Fighter jets should have been delivered months ago as well.
“This is about helping Ukraine defend and protect Ukrainian land. It is not an offensive threat to Russia,” said the weak-kneed and weak-willed Joe Biden. He’s afraid to “provoke” Putin.
Ukraine is waging a defensive war when it should have the offensive capability to take the fight to Russia itself.
Republican Senator Tom Cotton notes, “The Biden administration has finally relented and will send 31 American-made Abrams tanks to Ukraine. This decision is welcome, but it comes too late to help the Ukrainians as they prepare for a renewed Russian onslaught this spring. It illustrates, once again, how President Joe Biden’s half measures have made the war in Ukraine longer and bloodier than it should have been.”
Bur rather than take to heart the wisdom of Devin Nunes about the intelligence community misjudging Putin, failed Republican congressional candidate Joe Kent says support for Ukraine is “a huge payday for the military industrial complex” and now wants to run again, on a peace with Russia platform. He represents the Stephen K. Bannon and Tucker Carlson wing of the conservative movement.
As a military veteran, Joe Kent has to know that the “military-industrial complex” serves a valid purpose -- national defense -- and that China, Russia, and radical Islam, especially Iran, are among the major threats.
Joe Kent lost his bid to represent Southwest Washington in Congress, a seat previously held by a Republican.
Joe Kent’s wife became the first woman killed in combat against ISIS on January 16, 2019, and he accepted an award in her honor. The award is named for a woman who help the French resistance against Nazi Germany.
Kent should know that Islamic terrorism is directly linked to the old KGB, and that the old KGB runs Russia today. What is needed in the face of this threat is resistance as well.
Joe Kent, Stephen K. Bannon, and Tucker Carlson mock Ukraine’s fight for survival and complain about $100 billion spent on weapons for Ukraine.
If arms shipments to Ukraine are in fact resulting in a serious shortage of arms and ammunition in NATO member states, the answer is to rebuild our so-called “military-industrial complex.” National defense is a constitutional requirement.
I am old enough to remember that, faced with the aggressive designs of the Soviet empire, President Ronald Reagan spent billions of dollars on anti-communist guerrilla groups in Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East. It was called the Reagan Doctrine. Not all of these efforts were ultimately successful because the communists regrouped in many of those places, such as Nicaragua. But the key point is that what we are spending today in Ukraine is a piddling amount.
Aid to Ukraine should continue and be increased. But why is Biden sending foreign aid to communist South Africa, a Russian ally? China-Russia-South Africa joint military drills, named Operation Mosi, are scheduled to take place from February 17 to 26. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was just welcomed by his South African counterpart in Pretoria, South African Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor, where they declared the advent of a new “global order.”
An AFP story quoted Pandor as thanking Lavrov for the “most wonderful meeting” after the talks, which will “strengthen the already good relations” between the two countries. She described Russia as a “valued partner.”
Yet, Biden had declared, when he hosted President Ramaphosa of South Africa, “The United States and South Africa and your government have the same value set.” He added, “South Africa is a vital voice on the global stage and a leader in the international order.”
Incredibly, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen was just in South Africa, declaring the U.S. is seeking to deepen its “economic integration” with South Africa.
What America needs is a new version of the Reagan Doctrine, singling out communist governments for confrontation, even regime change. That means cutting off foreign aid to countries like South Africa. That means letting Israel take care of the Iranian nuclear bomb problem.
These are all serious threats. After devoting his entire political career to creating a New World Order, Biden was forced by the invasion of Ukraine to confront just one of them, in a half-hearted manner.
With the arrest of a former top FBI counterintelligence official who was involved in the Trump-Russia collusion investigation, Congress now has to actively pursue the issue of the U.S. intelligence community being infiltrated by Russian agents.
In regard to Ukraine, however, there is some good news -- the U.S., Germany, Britain, Poland, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands, Spain and Portugal have now agreed to send tanks to destroy Russia’s forces in eastern Ukraine. But is it too little too late?
In the face of all these foreign threats, the solution is to confront them all. Major impediments to a solution are China Joe and the pro-Russia wing of the "conservative" movement.
Joe Biden's Great Replacement
Joe Biden’s Great Replacement
By Cliff Kincaid
When anti-communist analysts and security experts examined Barack Hussein Obama’s history of associations with unsavory characters and communist figures, they had to wonder if Obama is a Marxist mole or a communist collaborator. In one sense, it didn’t matter. As a candidate, Obama didn’t have to undergo a background security check. As president, however, he had instant access to our most closely guarded and classified state secrets. His fingerprints are all over the “Obama-Biden” documents discovered in various places under the control of Joe.
Obama’s 30-year history of associating with unsavory characters, beginning with communist Frank Marshall Davis and continuing with Jeremiah Wright and communist terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, should have disqualified him from getting a security clearance in the government that he wanted to run. But no official vetting of Obama was ever done and he didn’t require or even need a security clearance.
This is truly a major loophole in our constitutional system. It resulted in the election of our first Marxist president.
As we have noted on numerous occasions, candidates for federal office, in contrast to federal employment, do not undergo any background checks at all.
So while more secret documents are being discovered in the possession of Joe Biden, they originate with the Obama Administration. That fact tells us all that we need to know.
As my group America’s Survival, Inc. has argued for years, it is mandatory and necessary to begin addressing what an old congressional committee used to call “un-American activities” at the highest levels of the U.S. Government.
Until the Congress re-launches such a committee and examines what led to the rise of Barack Hussein Obama, the issue of Joe Biden’s classified documents could result in Biden’s demise while empowering the man behind the curtain, Obama himself.
It looks like Obama wants Joe to step aside so that his wife Michelle can run for president in 2024. A Joel Gilbert film explores this possibility. Or else he is prepared to back Maryland’s first black Governor, Wes Moore, a vocal proponent of the marijuana industry, as a candidate. Like Obama in 2008, Moore was backed by Oprah.
The documents scandal isn’t just a problem for Joe, as the media suggest. These were from Obama’s period of time as president. So what role, if any, are Obama’s people playing in this documents scandal?
Podcaster Joe Rogan says, “I don’t know jack ---- about politics, but if I had to guess -- they’re trying to get rid of him [Biden]. My guess would be they’re trying to get rid of him.” Who’s they?
Here’s where the story gets interesting.
The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) issued a statement on August 12 declaring it had “assumed exclusive legal and physical custody of Obama Presidential records when President Barack Obama left office in 2017, in accordance with the Presidential Records Act (PRA).” NARA said it “moved approximately 30 million pages of unclassified records to a NARA facility in the Chicago” and that NARA “maintains the classified Obama Presidential records in a NARA facility in the Washington, DC, area.”
So how did the Obama classified records find their way into Joe Biden’s office and garage? The answer has to be that Obama and/or his people held onto some of them. What this shows is that NARA was either misled by Obama-Biden or misled the public and the press in order for Attorney General Merrick Garland to single out Trump for scrutiny.
Anders Hagstrom of Fox News wrote a fascinating story noting that the National Archives responded to questions about presidential documents on October 11, less than a month before classified documents would be found at the Biden think tank in Washington. NARA claimed at this point that all documents from Obama administration had been "securely moved" to locations that met “strict archival and security standards.”
The question bears repeating: So how did the Obama classified records find their way into Joe Biden’s office and garage?
My hunch is that Obama holdovers acquired and planted them.
Jeff Poor of Breitbart noticed an interview given by Rep. Jerry Carl (R-AL) about Biden being “set up” by his own people. Carl said. “It’s almost like he’s being set up by his own people. They waited until after the election. They waited until after the Democrats lost a majority for this stuff to start leaking out. They knew it was there back in early November. Why didn’t they do it then when they had full control? All three houses could say it’s no big deal, whitewash and let’s move on. They didn’t.”
Carl added, “So, it’s almost like his own people are trying to destroy him at this point.”
I like the way Rep. Carl thinks. Except that it’s not “his own people.” These are mostly Obama’s people.
As we watch the Biden documents scandal unfold, look for another Obama waiting in the wings. It could be Michelle or Wes Moore.
"There s No Shortage of Cruelty"
“There is No Shortage of Cruelty”
By Cliff Kincaid
“There is no shortage of cruelty out there” is one of the comments in a public service announcement asking for donations to save animals. Pictures of dogs cowering for survival in a snow-filled landscape tug at your heart strings. How can people abuse and mistreat animals? But how can people do this to one another?
I saw the ad after the anti-abortion March for Life occurred in Washington, D.C. and news is breaking that the world is bracing for another massive Russian military assault on the people of Ukraine. Both events have one thing in common – the philosophy of atheistic communism.
Yet, the world seems indifferent to the fate of the unborn and the fate of Ukraine
Ex-Communist Whittaker Chambers explained how the abortion mentality was the communist mentality. “Abortion was a commonplace of party life,” he wrote in his classic 1952 work Witness. “There were Communist doctors who rendered that service for a small fee. Communists who were more choosy knew liberal doctors who would render the same service for a larger fee. Abortion, which now fills me with physical horror, I then regarded, like all Communists, as a mere physical manipulation.”
It was all physical because, in the communist view, there was nothing spiritual.
If we believe that humans deserve the right to live in peace and freedom, how can we defend abortion? And how can we remain indifferent to the fate of the people of Ukraine? These are two major issues that are front and center right now, far more important than a few classified documents left in Joe Biden’s garage.
In my view, those documents are relevant only in terms of what we already know about the Biden Administration – it is thoroughly compromised by our enemies, most prominently Russia and China.
Russian dictator Vladimir Putin hides behind the spiritual. Divorced and said to have a mistress, he has presented himself as a defender of the Christian faith and Christian values. He counts on conservatives in the United States to ignore the fact that he was a Soviet KGB officer and ran its successor, the FSB.
His apologists insist that Russian leaders have not only turned away from their communist past and involvement with the KGB, but are Bible-believing Christians today. But the Russian Orthodox Church, which backs the invasion of Ukraine, has been dominated by Putin’s old KGB and continues to serve the interests of the Kremlin. Former KGB officer Konstantin Preobrazhensky has called the Russian Orthodox Church “Putin’s Espionage Church,” and devotes a major portion of his book, KGB/FSB’s New Trojan Horse, to its use by the Russian intelligence service.
What’s worse, even as the pain and suffering continue, the West is divided over the issue of coming to the aid of Ukraine. Biden’s response has been too little too late, while Germany endlessly debates what weapons to provide. It seems that Germany is determined to preserve its relationship with Russia. This gives Russia another opportunity to inflict more devastation on Ukraine.
It is a well-known fact that Germany has consistently over the years failed to meet the NATO commitment of spending 2 percent of GDP on defense, causing former President Trump to conclude that “enough is enough,” in terms of Germany not doing enough to defend itself. Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, considered by some to be a Russian agent, made Germany more dependent on Russian oil and gas by terminating Germany’s nuclear energy program.
At a rally, Trump had declared, “We’re supposed to protect Germany from Russia, but Germany is paying Russia billions of dollars for energy coming from a pipeline, brand-new pipeline…How does that work?”
Remember that one of Biden’s first actions in office was to reverse the Trump approach and approve that Russian pipeline to Germany. It backfired. Was Russian influence over Joe and/or Hunter a factor? That’s reasonable to investigate. But the urgent matter before us is whether the United States will help this anti-communist nation resist what Putin has done to these people and what he has planned.
At the time, I had applauded the Trump approach to Germany. An American President had decided to move 10,000 American troops out of a deadbeat U.S. “ally,” already under Russian domination, from 34,500 to 25,000, moving them elsewhere.
Only a fool could argue for Americans troops on the soil of a European nation that had been falling into Putin’s hands anyway.
But everything changed under Biden, when he virtually encouraged a Russian invasion of its former Soviet republic, saying it might be only an "incursion," and has then failed to deliver the weapons Ukraine needs for victory.
Anti-communist conservatives in America have no alternative but to pressure the Biden Administration to deliver more and better weapons to Ukraine. To do otherwise is to deliver a nation back into the Russian empire and encourage a Chinese invasion of Taiwan.
Dismissing the war in Ukraine as a “regional conflict” only serves the interests of the Kremlin. This is a World War that involves not only Russia but its allies Communist China and Iran.
As the ad says, “There is no shortage of cruelty out there.” Spending less than a dollar a day helps save abandoned animals. Spending a few dollars every day will help save the people of Ukraine.
Whether the World War expands further depends on whether we can see beyond the issue of classified documents in a garage and understand how the cruelty of the communists, their allies and collaborators must be exposed and stopped now.
Who Planted the Biden Documents?
Who Planted the Biden Documents?
By Cliff Kincaid
Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) is suspicious, and so am I.
“Alleged classified documents showing up allegedly in the possession of Joseph Biden… I’m suspicious of the timing of it," Rep. Johnson told Fox News' Hillary Vaughn after a second batch of documents was found in the president's garage in Wilmington, Delaware, next to his Corvette. “I'm also aware of the fact that things can be planted on people…things can be planted in places and then discovered conveniently. That may be what has occurred here. I'm not ruling that out. But I’m open in terms of the investigation needs to be investigated.”
Planted by whom? More importantly, discovered by whom?
The question of discovery, or timing, is more important than who planted them, since they were discovered as Biden was about to launch a 2024 election bid and was already the subject of a “progressive” push to step down from the race. This is just too coincidental.
In early December, the "progressive" group Roots Action had unveiled a “Don’t Run Joe” campaign and proclaimed “…his prospects for winning re-election appear to be bleak. With so much at stake, making him the Democratic Party’s standard-bearer in 2024 would be a tragic mistake.”
Obama already passed a socialized medicine scheme, known as Obamacare, and Biden has passed much of his Green New Deal. But the inflation that resulted, as well as a recession, make Biden a liability. Plus, Biden's no-win war in Ukraine is a major liability.
Since Kamala Harris is a laughing stock, but the need is still great to have a black woman on the top of the ticket, the door is open for Michelle Obama. Joel Gilbert’s film examines this likelihood.
To return to the latest Biden scandal, keep in mind that these were Obama-Biden documents. It’s doubtful the Republicans had anything to do with planting them. That can be attributed to the Bidens. But it looks like Obama’s fingerprints are all over this.
When you hear or read about “Obama-Biden documents” or “Obama-era documents,” you know who’s likely pulling the strings behind this latest scandal. Biden doesn’t know what he’s doing. But Obama does.
And don’t you find it suspicious that this story emerged from major elements of the liberal media? CBS Evening News announced the “breaking news” on its January 9 program.
Piling on top of Biden, former Clinton Adviser David Gergen told CNN the classified documents scandal is a “gigantic story” and questioned why the president’s team did not make more of an attempt to get ahead of it.” Well, maybe it’s because Biden’s “team” includes many Obama holdovers who want to see Biden pull out of the 2024 presidential race.
Don’t forget that when Biden took office, the Associated Press noted the “swelling ranks of Obama officials in Biden’s orbit.” One estimate was that 60 Percent of Biden’s Cabinet appointments were Obama officials.
Yes, there are unanswered questions. But we know enough at this stage to understand what’s happening – Joe is out.
Going back to the AP story, “the reliance on Obama veterans carries risks.”
Sen. Mike Braun, R-Ind. released a 63-page report, “Joe Biden’s Groundhog Day: How the Swamp Keeps Coming Back, Again and Again,” about how Biden “recycled personnel from the Obama administration.” Some of the more high-profile officials in the Biden administration who used to work in the Obama administration include Susan Rice, John Kerry, and Ron Klain.
Susan Rice, director of the Domestic Policy Council, has been called the “power broker” and Politico noted, “She was too hot to touch even for some in her own party by the end of the Obama years, having become the chief protagonist in Republicans’ investigations into the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.” She ran Obama’s National Security Council and was implicated in the Benghazi terror attack cover-up.
Hence, the Braun report noted that Rice’s handling of Benghazi “disqualified her from consideration of additional posts requiring Senate confirmation.” For this reason, she was appointed to lead Biden’s Domestic Policy Council, “placing her in a quiet, but crucial role developing and driving the President’s domestic agenda.”
Rice was also implicated in illegally unmasking Trump campaign and post-election Trump transition officials in monitored conversations.
Clearly, Joe doesn't know what hit him. Even a Special Counsel investigation that finds him guilty of incompetence won't be good enough to save him. In fact, it will add fuel to the fire, as days, weeks, and months of investigations go by.
The Democratic Party knows that Joe will not survive politically. He cannot survive.
But depending on his mental state, Joe knows a lot about Democratic Party operations. He can’t be completely ruled out as a political survivor. Will he turn the tables on his former boss? And what would happen then?
Among the Obama holdovers, perhaps the most important is Merrick Garland, nominated by Obama to the Supreme Court but ending up as Biden’s Attorney General. He is Obama’s fixer.
Before YouTube terminated my channel, eliminating 500 videos from public view, I had analyzed the issue of then-judge Merrick Garland’s involvement in a court case brought by the Obama Administration to drop terrorism charges against a communist by the name of Elizabeth Anna Duke. She was a member of a Weather Underground spin-off that specialized in terrorism, including bombing the U.S. Capitol in 1983, and fake IDs. Then-Judge Merrick Garland found no problem with a magistrate who arbitrarily dropped the charges against her, at the request of Obama’s Justice Department.
In terms of who, what, when, where, why, and how, let's look at the lawyers involved in the classified documents case.
CBS reported that "longtime Democratic lawyer Bob Bauer is serving as the personal attorney for President Biden" in this matter. But here's the rest of the story, as told by CBS: “He served as White House counsel for President Barack Obama and as a top attorney in the 2020 Biden campaign… Bauer is also listed as Obama's representative to the National Archives, the designee for document requests and matters that may arise with the former president's papers."
Bauer served as White House Counsel to President Obama from 2009 to 2011. He also served as general counsel to Obama for America, the president’s campaign organization, in 2008 and 2012.
Former Biden adviser Anita Dunn worked for Obama, too. According to CBS, she was “widely considered inside and outside the West Wing as poised to become the first woman to be White House chief of staff.”
She previously served as acting White House Communications Director in the Obama White House and was a managing director at SKDK, the “leading” Democratic media and political consulting firm.
If Michelle ultimately decides not to run, the beneficiary of the latest Biden scandal will likely be Maryland’s first black governor Wes Moore, a favorite of Oprah Winfrey (just like Barack Obama) whose campaign was engineered by SKDK. Moore ran on a marijuana legalization platform and served as an officer of a marijuana business.
In addition to the illegal aliens, more than 22 million marijuana users, or stoners, constitute a major voting bloc for Obama’s “permanent revolution.”
The Lies of Obama-Biden
The Lies of Obama-Biden
By Cliff Kincaid
The lies of Obama-Biden are far more significant than those of one member of Congress, Rep. George Santos, who claimed to be gay and fudged the facts about his background. Obama campaigned under false pretenses as a Christian when he was a Marxist mole in the American political system. Now, Obama-Biden secret documents are being found in a closet and a garage. I suspect Obama’s hand behind Biden’s latest scandal.
For his part, when he ran in 2008, Obama must have figured that since the major media were failing to seriously examine his background, they would be prepared to overlook or at least minimize Joe Biden’s history of plagiarism. It was a good bet. Charges of plagiarism drove Biden from the presidential race in 1988. But they didn’t become a factor in 2008, when Obama picked Biden as his vice-president, or 2020, when Biden ran as president.
Everybody knows that Biden, like Santos, had a tendency to exaggerate or embellish but Biden’s career flourished since those incidents. It’s because he served the interests of the elites devoted to what Biden in a Wall Street Journal called the “New World Order.”
Now, apparently, Biden can be discarded. I suspect Obama is pulling the strings behind the scene. After all, to repeat, “Obama-Biden documents” are being discovered.
In terms of Obama, at the real center of this scandal, we don’t need a special counsel to learn that Barack Hussein Obama campaigned in 2008 as a Christian but was never baptized a Christian in the traditional sense. On the other hand, Biden campaigned as a Catholic who didn’t take Catholic teachings seriously.
Since Republicans seem overwrought at the lies that were told by George Santos, let them use their new-found power in the House to open a full-scale investigation into how Barack Hussein Obama came to power and why he chose Biden has his vice-president. It is never too late to put the facts on the record, especially since Obama is widely perceived to be calling the shots in the JoeBama Administration and may be orchestrating the removal of Biden.
Remember that Attorney General Merrick Garland was originally Obama’s pick for the Supreme Court. He is Obama’s fixer.
In regard to Santos, Democrat House Representatives Dan Goldman and Ritchie Torres filed a complaint with the House Ethics Committee against him. They claim “Santos must be held accountable for defrauding both Congress and the public.”
That’s fascinating. When questions came up during the 2008 campaign about Barack Obama’s religious affiliation, among other matters, his aides flatly asserted that he was a “practicing Christian” and was “baptized” in the Trinity United Church of Christ, led by Jeremiah Wright.
But calling yourself something is not the same thing as proving it is the case.
Unfortunately for Obama and his backers, the same Obama apparatus which claimed that he is a Christian asserted that the mysterious “Frank” in Obama’s book, Dreams from My Father, was just a black civil rights activist. It turned out that “Frank” was Frank Marshall Davis, a Communist Party member under surveillance by the FBI who served as a mentor for a young Obama in Hawaii. The 600-page FBI file on Davis even suggests he was an espionage agent on behalf of the Soviet Union.
As I discovered at the time, it is important to take a look at what Obama’s own books, Dreams from My Father and The Audacity of Hope, say about the President’s religion, or lack thereof.
He acknowledges in Dreams that his grandfather was a Muslim (page 104) and that he spent two years in a Muslim school in Indonesia studying the Koran (page 154). In The Audacity of Hope, he says (page 204) that “my father had been raised a Muslim” but that by the time he met his mother, his father was a “confirmed atheist.”
His stepfather was not particularly religious and his mother professed “secularism,” Obama wrote (pages 204-205), but as a child he went to a “predominantly Muslim school,” after being first sent to a Catholic school. Obama’s reference to being baptized is found in his second book, The Audacity of Hope, published in 2006, not in Dreams, published in 1995. Obama wrote on page 208, “I was finally able to walk down the aisle of Trinity United Church of Christ one day and be baptized.”
Traditionally, Christianity teaches that baptism is a sacrament involving the use of water to signify acceptance of Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. Since Obama was not baptized at the time of his birth, in order to become a Christian he had to enter into the sacrament of baptism at some point later in life.
But Obama does not indicate anywhere in his books that he came into contact with what Christians regard as the “living water.” Instead, he says that, in his baptism, he made “a choice,” knelt beneath a cross, and “felt God’s spirit beckoning.” He said, “I submitted myself to His will, and dedicated myself to discovering His truth.”
This sounds like a powerful experience but it is not what Christians regard as baptism. In fact, there’s no evidence it was a baptism in the traditional sense that it was performed by Wright or anybody else. It looks like Obama walked down the aisle and made a profession of faith. That is not a Christian baptism.
We can clearly see that Obama was leading a secret life as a committed Marxist and was deceiving voters into believing he was a dedicated Christian. These lies make Santos look like a piker.
Frank Chapman, a CPUSA supporter, wrote in the party newspaper that “Obama’s victory was more than a progressive move; it was a dialectical leap ushering in a qualitatively new era of struggle.” He explained, “Marx once compared revolutionary struggle with the work of the mole, who sometimes burrows so far beneath the ground that he leaves no trace of his movement on the surface. This is the old revolutionary ‘mole,’ not only showing his traces on the surface but also breaking through.”
After digesting our book, Permanent Revolution: The Secret Life and Legacy of Barack Hussein Obama, KGB defector Konstantin Preobrazensky said, “I agree with everything and support every single word of it.” He understands that America is suffering through its own communist revolution and that Russia and China intend to come out on top, as America is left in ashes.
That book was the third in our series on Obama and explored the increasing importance of the New Age movement, drugs, and homosexual and transgender ideology. Obama knows what he’s doing. Biden does not. That’s why Biden is expendable.
As House Republicans threaten to investigate this or that, no issue is more important than how Obama seized power under false pretenses and how his operatives continue to run the Democratic Party. This is especially true as billionaires finance a temple to his honor (the “Obama presidential center”) in Chicago.
Come to think of it, perhaps a subpoena should be issued to the Barack Obama Foundation, which oversees construction of the Obama presidential center, demanding any classified documents removed by Joe Biden (or Barack Hussein Obama) during the time Obama-Biden occupied the White House.
Joe Biden and Hunter are just bit players in Obama’s “Permanent revolution.” Republicans should keep their eyes on the prize.